Just use keepass. It installs everywhere and uses decent crypto.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020, 5:30 AM Jonathan Dowland
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:10:50PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Shouldn't this be just the opposite -- local10 should encrypt the file
> with his
> >recipient's public
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:29:06 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 25 aug 20, 14:17:26, Celejar wrote:
> >
> > I do use Signal on mobile, and I want to like it, but there are a few
> > things about it that just really bother me (these may not be relevant
> > to the OPs situation):
>
> I never cl
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 08:10:50PM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't this be just the opposite -- local10 should encrypt the file with his
recipient's public key, and then his recipient can unencrypt it with his (the
recipient's) private key?
You can perform symmetric encryption with G
On Ma, 25 aug 20, 14:17:26, Celejar wrote:
>
> I do use Signal on mobile, and I want to like it, but there are a few
> things about it that just really bother me (these may not be relevant
> to the OPs situation):
I never claimed it's perfect, just that it's not a "black box". See also
this comm
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 14:03:21 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 21 aug 20, 13:07:56, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:31:00 -0500
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > GnuPG. It's in Debian, there's Windows versions on its website, and
> > > it's not some mystery box like Signal.
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:30:09 +0200
wrote:
> I always thought it should be banned by the Geneva Convention, but
> OSHA would be fine by me, too.
I think the US stopped honoring the Geneva Conventions during the Dubya
administration. Of course, that doesn't leave much hope for OSHA
enforcement eit
On Sun, 23 Aug 2020 14:03:21 +0300
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Signal is free and open source software.
>
> Please do feel free to inspect the source code for potential back
> doors or vulnerabilities.
Thank you for the correction. https://signal.org
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
htt
On Vi, 21 aug 20, 13:07:56, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:31:00 -0500
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > GnuPG. It's in Debian, there's Windows versions on its website, and
> > it's not some mystery box like Signal.
>
> ++
>
> It also has the advantage that the cryptext will stay enc
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 11:01:34AM +0200, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
[...]
> Not to mention that GPG can be used for asymmetric cryptography.
Yeah, but it's a "Windows user" at the other end, and (s)he's "too
dumb to install software". And "gpg is too hard".
I must say, this theme, which came up he
W dniu pią, 21.08.2020 o godzinie 13∶07 -0600, użytkownik Charles
Curley napisał:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:31:00 -0500
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > GnuPG. It's in Debian, there's Windows versions on its website,
> > and
> > it's not some mystery box like Signal.
>
> ++
>
> It also has the advan
On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 15:43:56 -0500
Greg Marks wrote:
> One cross-platform encryption method would be to use OpenSSL
> (https://www.openssl.org/). The Linux user might use the following
> commands.
>
> Encryption:
> openssl aes-256-cbc -pbkdf2 -iter 100 -in plaintext.txt -out
> ciphertext.
One cross-platform encryption method would be to use OpenSSL
(https://www.openssl.org/). The Linux user might use the following
commands.
Encryption:
openssl aes-256-cbc -pbkdf2 -iter 100 -in plaintext.txt -out
ciphertext.txt
Decryption:
openssl aes-256-cbc -pbkdf2 -iter 100 -d -in c
On 2020-08-21 18:46, local10 wrote:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
Linux and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would
be able decrypt and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
If these are documents what's wrong with open office prot
Darac Marjal wrote:
> Signal (signal.org)
>
> Signal is an instant messaging application. It uses a well respected
> end-to-end encryption protocol (meaning that the messages are encrypted
> by the client and sent over the internet before being decrypted by the
> recipient's client).
OP asking f
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:28:02PM -0400, Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 20:10:50 -0400
> rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> You're right. Please consider my last email proof that exposure to
> Windows causes brain damage and that its use in the corporate workplace
> should be cons
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 20:10:50 -0400
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, August 21, 2020 04:11:19 PM Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> > I don't disagree, but how likely is it that local10's intended
> > recipient will...
> >
> > 1. Have GnuPG installed on their Windows machine?
> > 2. Know how to use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 22/8/20 3:46 am, local10 wrote:
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
>
> Any ideas?
On Friday, August 21, 2020 04:11:19 PM Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> I don't disagree, but how likely is it that local10's intended
> recipient will...
>
> 1. Have GnuPG installed on their Windows machine?
> 2. Know how to use it to decrypt files using local10's public key?
Shouldn't this be just th
can somehow verify the
sent e-mail...
???
Linux-Fan
--=_pte5-5038-1598034269-0003
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
local10 writes:
> Hi,
>
> What would be a reasonably secure and
* 2020-08-21 20:24:29+02, Linux-Fan wrote:
> GPG should also run on Windows, but is a little harder to use IMHO.
GnuPG it is pretty hard everywhere. Your recent signatures are reported
as "bad" (at least by Notmuch and Mutt). The signed data (message)
doesn't match with the signature.
About this
> Best
>
> Hans
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> > and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> > decrypt and read them?
> >
> > Any ideas? Thanks
[1
ndows guys
Best
Hans
> Hi,
>
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
>
> Any ideas? Thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 21:59:15 +0200
wrote:
> If you are somewhat serious about security, you better don't use this:
>
> "ZIP supports a simple password-based symmetric encryption
>system generally known as ZipCrypto. It is documented in
>the ZIP specification, and known to be seriously
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:42:23PM -0400, Matthew Graybosch wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:46:13 +0200 (CEST)
> local10 wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
> > Linux and then send them to a non-techni
john doe writes:
On 8/21/2020 9:11 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 2020-08-21 11:24, Linux-Fan wrote:
[...]
Encrypt on Linux:
$ 7z a -ptestwort -mhe=on secret.7z secret.txt
Decrypt on Windows: Double-Click or use commandline:
% 7z x -o. secret.7z
So, the recipient must install 7-Zip on
On 2020-08-21 12:10, Teemu Likonen wrote:
I forgot to say that the file names are not encrypted in Zip archives.
They can be seen without password. To protect against that use Zip
twice: the inner layer is unencrypted archive for all the files and
outer layer encrypts the inner Zip file.
PeaZi
On 8/21/2020 9:11 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 2020-08-21 11:24, Linux-Fan wrote:
local10 writes:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
Linux
and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
decrypt and read them?
Any ideas
On 2020-08-21 11:24, Linux-Fan wrote:
local10 writes:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
Linux
and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
decrypt and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Consider 7-Zip from Debian package p7zip
* 2020-08-21 22:00:45+03, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> If your security is just about confidentiality (other's can't have the
> content) and you don't have really serious hackers targeting you then
> probably encrypted Zip archives are good enough. Obviously a good enough
> password is needed and secure
On 2020-08-21 10:46, local10 wrote:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux and
then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able decrypt
and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
I maintain a working Windows installation for use-cases like
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:31:00 -0500
Paul Johnson wrote:
> GnuPG. It's in Debian, there's Windows versions on its website, and
> it's not some mystery box like Signal.
++
It also has the advantage that the cryptext will stay encrypted on any
intermediate servers. WhatsApp and Signal claim their
* 2020-08-21 19:46:13+02, local wrote:
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
> Linux and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would
> be able decrypt and read them?
If your security is just about confidentiality (other's can'
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:46:13 +0200 (CEST)
local10 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on
> Linux and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she
> would be able decrypt and read them?
The "zip" command has an &q
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 12:46 PM local10 wrote:
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
>
GnuPG. It's in Debian, there's Windows versio
local10 writes:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
decrypt and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Consider 7-Zip from Debian package p7zip-full and available for Windows
syswtems
On 8/21/2020 7:46 PM, local10 wrote:
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux and
then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able decrypt
and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Veracrypt could be one option.
--
John Doe
On 21/08/2020 18:46, local10 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux
> and then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able
> decrypt and read them?
Signal (signal.org)
Signal is an instant messaging applica
Hi,
What would be a reasonably secure and simple way to encrypt files on Linux and
then send them to a non-technical Windows user so she would be able decrypt
and read them?
Any ideas? Thanks
Using SMB (or not, although accessing through Samba is the primary
interest), is it possible to have the files encrypted with on-the-fly
decryption?
TIA,
Hank
39 matches
Mail list logo
