Quoting martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org):
> also sprach Christian Seiler [2015-04-20 17:37 +0200]:
> > Well, haven't tried this myself, and don't know about the performance
> > (FUSE can be quite slow at times), but you could try bindfs, a FUSE
> > filesystem for creating bind mounts that alte
also sprach Christian Seiler [2015-04-20 17:37 +0200]:
> Well, haven't tried this myself, and don't know about the performance
> (FUSE can be quite slow at times), but you could try bindfs, a FUSE
> filesystem for creating bind mounts that alter permissions (it's
> packaged in Debian).
Interestin
Hi,
Am 2015-04-20 15:32, schrieb martin f krafft:
Short of the sledgehammer approaches of using either a cronjob to
brute-force permissions at regular intervals, or an incronjob to
pave over any changes right when they happen, I am at a loss. And
I'd like to avoid both those hacks because they a
also sprach martin f krafft [2015-04-20 15:32 +0200]:
> g+s on the directory (as well as the Samba "force directory mode"
> setting) do not affect existing files moved into the tree, which is
> what happens most of the time actually. ACLs also don't work, since
> they are ultimately governed by th
Hey folks,
turning to the larger audience in search for new ideas… since POSIX
is based on discretionary access control (meaning that the
application/user have the final say), and after Samba 4 dropped the
"force directory security mode" & Co. settings, we are finding it
really hard to provide a g
5 matches
Mail list logo
