Alex Samad escribió:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:41:43PM +0100, Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS. On some tests that I have done, I have 40 MB/s more than the same
hardware with ext3 FS. Have you seen the same ?
On 01/21/2009 01:15 AM, David Baron wrote:
For booting, one can do as one does using LVM. Keep the needed small
partitions in ext3 and put everything else in ext4.
Is it possible to change existing partitions or logical LVM partitions using
tune2fs or similar?
Yes.
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS. On some tests that I have done, I have 40 MB/s more than the same
hardware with ext3 FS. Have you seen the same ?
My doubt is about the stability, is it really for production use ? I
want to know that because
Adrian Chapela (2009-01-20 12:41 +0100) wrote:
My doubt is about the stability, is it really for production use ? I
want to know that because I am really interested in use in production
use (like most of us, I think...).
I can't comment the stability of the filesystem itself but I'd like to
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Adrian Chapela
achapela.rexist...@gmail.com wrote:
I am doing my own tests with Ext4.
My doubt is about the stability, is it really for production use ? I want
to know that because I am really interested in use in production use (like
most of us, I
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:41:43 +0100
Adrian Chapela achapela.rexist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS. On some tests that I have done, I have 40 MB/s more than the same
hardware with ext3 FS. Have you seen the same ?
My
Teemu Likonen escribió:
Adrian Chapela (2009-01-20 12:41 +0100) wrote:
My doubt is about the stability, is it really for production use ? I
want to know that because I am really interested in use in production
use (like most of us, I think...).
I can't comment the stability of the
Micha Feigin escribió:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:41:43 +0100
Adrian Chapela achapela.rexist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS. On some tests that I have done, I have 40 MB/s more than the same
hardware with ext3 FS. Have you
On 01/20/2009 05:41 AM, Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS. On some tests that I have done, I have 40 MB/s more than the same
hardware with ext3 FS. Have you seen the same ?
My doubt is about the stability, is it really for
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:41:43PM +0100, Adrian Chapela wrote:
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS. On some tests that I have done, I have 40 MB/s more than the same
hardware with ext3 FS. Have you seen the same ?
what are you using to test ?
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:22:07 +0100
Adrian Chapela achapela.rexist...@gmail.com wrote:
Micha Feigin escribió:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:41:43 +0100
Adrian Chapela achapela.rexist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS.
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:41:43 +0100
Adrian Chapela achapela.rexist...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
I am doing my own tests with Ext4. It has better performance than ext3
FS. On some tests that I have done, I have 40 MB/s more than the same
hardware with ext3 FS. Have you seen the same ?
Here
For booting, one can do as one does using LVM. Keep the needed small
partitions in ext3 and put everything else in ext4.
Is it possible to change existing partitions or logical LVM partitions using
tune2fs or similar?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
13 matches
Mail list logo