On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:39:32PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/29/07 17:54, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
It sounds like the Log File System (LFS) that NetBSD is working on, or
the database-style of a mainframe where every 'file' is really a record
in a database where back copies are
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 09:20:39AM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:39:32PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/29/07 17:54, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
It sounds like the Log File System (LFS) that NetBSD is working on, or
the database-style of a mainframe where
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
That's what I meant by database-style of a mainframe. It may not be
an actual database built on-top of a filesystem, but the ideas behind it
are the same.
...
I agree. How does one implement it under *NIX?
Perhaps AFS might do some of what you want.
--
John
On 07/03/07 08:20, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:39:32PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/29/07 17:54, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
It sounds like the Log File System (LFS) that NetBSD is working on, or
the database-style of a mainframe where every 'file' is really a
On 06/29/07 17:54, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:45:03PM +, Manon Metten wrote:
It's definitely no ordinary backup or RAID. It even works with a single hd.
SFS takes care of all this. I don't have to backup anything. SFS just
writes all subsequent copies of a file
Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
On 06/30/2007 03:00 PM, William Pursell wrote:
Keep in mind that CVS is extremely old, and entirely obsolete.
Subversion was a new implementation of the same idea, and did
in fact address many of CVS's shortcomings.
I second that.
However, if you are going to look into
Hi William,
On 6/30/07, William Pursell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind that CVS is extremely old, and entirely obsolete.
Subversion was a new implementation of the same idea, and
did in fact address many of CVS's shortcomings. However,
if you are going to look into using a VCS (Version
I was (and I suppose still am) a huge fan of subversion.
I loved RCS, hated CVS, and found subversion to be a God-send
I started using git about 3 weeks ago
William
Under Debian Etch I see the following packages listed
git-arch
git-core
git-cvs
Cousin Stanley wrote:
I was (and I suppose still am) a huge fan of subversion.
I loved RCS, hated CVS, and found subversion to be a God-send
I started using git about 3 weeks ago
William
Under Debian Etch I see the following packages listed
git-arch
Hi Douglas,
On 6/29/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:45:03PM +, Manon Metten wrote:
I've never used it but you can probably use a CVS repository for this
more conveniently.
I don't know nothing about CVS repositories. Can you explain a little
Hi Sam,
On 6/30/07, Sam Leon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext3cow does this but it is not in debian repos for some reason
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/02/0413253
Thanks for the link. I checked out ext3cow, but taking snapshots is
not exactly what I meant. SFS takes no
Manon Metten wrote:
Hi Sam,
On 6/30/07, *Sam Leon* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext3cow does this but it is not in debian repos for some reason
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/02/0413253
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:29:58PM +, Manon Metten wrote:
On 6/29/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:45:03PM +, Manon Metten wrote:
I've never used it but you can probably use a CVS repository for this
more conveniently.
I don't know
Hi Sam,
On 6/30/07, Sam Leon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I swear I have heard of something like that for ext3. I though it was
ext3cow. Took me like 30 minutes to find it on google, lol. hmm
Oh my! Well, thanks again. Although ext3cow is not what I am looking for,
your effort is much
Hi Douglas,
On 6/30/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the apt descriptions for subversion and cvs. From the description
of cvs:
CVS is a version control system, which allows you to keep old
versions of files (usually source code), keep a log of who,
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:29:58PM +, Manon Metten wrote:
On 6/29/07, Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:45:03PM +, Manon Metten wrote:
I've never used it but you can probably use a CVS repository for this
more
On 06/30/2007 03:00 PM, William Pursell wrote:
Keep in mind that CVS is extremely old, and entirely obsolete.
Subversion was a new implementation of the same idea, and did
in fact address many of CVS's shortcomings.
I second that.
However, if you are going to look into using a VCS (Version
Hi,
On my Debian GNU/Linux box I use ext3 file system. On my other platform
(AmigaOS) I use SmartFileSystem (SFS). Well, I don't know nothing about
file systems, but SFS has one feature I really miss in ext3: .recycled.
Every file I delete or every file I overwrite, ends up in .recycled. This
Hi.
Manon Metten, 29.06.2007 19:06:
Now after saving for the fifth time, I realize that I had accidentally
deleted some
vital info. How can I retrieve that? I just open eg. .recycled/my_doc$AAB,
copy
the info that was not deleted at that time and paste it in my current doc.
Now here's my
On 6/29/07, Mathias Brodala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now after saving for the fifth time, I realize that I had accidentally
deleted some
vital info. How can I retrieve that? I just open eg. .recycled/my_doc$AAB,
copy
the info that was not deleted at that time and paste it in my current doc.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:45:03PM +, Manon Metten wrote:
It's definitely no ordinary backup or RAID. It even works with a single hd.
SFS takes care of all this. I don't have to backup anything. SFS just
writes all subsequent copies of a file to different locations on the hd and
moves
Manon Metten wrote:
Hi,
On my Debian GNU/Linux box I use ext3 file system. On my other platform
(AmigaOS) I use SmartFileSystem (SFS). Well, I don't know nothing about
file systems, but SFS has one feature I really miss in ext3: .recycled.
Every file I delete or every file I overwrite, ends
Ron Johnson, Jr. wrote:
| To use a Sony digital camera with my Debian laptop, all I had to do
| was to include this line in /etc/udev/udev.rules:
|
|BUS=scsi, SYSFS_vendor=Sony, NAME=camera
|
| If you ever get another hot-pluggable Sony device, your rule
| will fail. Better to be a bit
Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into
| a Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the
| following?
|
| When I plug in the camera, I assume there are three devices that must
| be created in the /dev
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 14:52 -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote:
Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into
| a Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the
| following?
|
| When I plug in the camera, I assume
Hi guys,
I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into a
Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the following?
When I plug in the camera, I assume there are three devices that must be
created in the /dev directory, no?
#1 : a device for the camera's
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 21:35 -0500, Christian Convey wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm curious about the way a USB camera gets set up when plugged into a
Sarge / 2.6.9 system. I'm also using 'udev'. Anyone know the following?
When I plug in the camera, I assume there are three devices that must be
27 matches
Mail list logo
