Adam, trust me, I went through this three months ago, I got involved
in some significant discussion on rtr's forum, and the best possible
solution, the one that rtr itself recommends, is the one I described
above. Put the special libraries in a special place, and let apache
know about it using
One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old library, then
copy the installed libraries, by hand, into /usr/local/lib. You can then
upgrade back to the current libraries and everything should work without
the need for the LD_PRELOAD.
I'm very new to this but couldn't you end up with
Hi,
Dale == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dale On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Steffen R. Mueller wrote:
Dale One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old
Dale library, then copy the installed libraries, by hand, into
Dale /usr/local/lib. You can then upgrade back to the current
Dale
On Wed, 9 Apr 1997, Adam Shand wrote:
One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old library, then
copy the installed libraries, by hand, into /usr/local/lib. You can then
upgrade back to the current libraries and everything should work without
the need for the LD_PRELOAD.
I'm
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are confusing ld.so with gcc. The compiler/linker doesn't search
/usr/local, you would need to direct it to look there. What you need to
put into /usr/local/lib is the shared libraries used by ld.so during
program loading. This path is on the list of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 09-Apr-97 Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are confusing ld.so with gcc. The compiler/linker doesn't search
/usr/local, you would need to direct it to look there. What you need to
put into /usr/local/lib is the shared
On 8 Apr 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
Dale == Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dale On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Steffen R. Mueller wrote:
Dale One way to deal with this would be to downgrade to the old
Dale library, then copy the installed libraries, by hand, into
Dale
On 9 Apr 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
Dale Scheetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are confusing ld.so with gcc. The compiler/linker doesn't search
/usr/local, you would need to direct it to look there. What you need to
put into /usr/local/lib is the shared libraries used by ld.so during
Hi.
Sorry for the follow-up post so soon after. I managed to find a copy of
the old libg++ 2.7.1 that I needed on the September 1996 Infomagic CD.
For anyone interested if you want the FP97 extensions to work with Debian
linux all you need to do is is *downgrade* libg++ to version 2.7.1 and it
Thus spake Adam Shand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi.
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the follow-up post so soon after. I managed to find a copy of
the old libg++ 2.7.1 that I needed on the September 1996 Infomagic CD.
For anyone interested if you want the FP97 extensions to work with Debian
linux all
For anyone interested if you want the FP97 extensions to work with Debian
linux all you need to do is is *downgrade* libg++ to version 2.7.1 and it
all becomes easy. If anyone needs help I'll be happy to provide what help
I can.
Was it really necessary to downgrade the complete system ? I
On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Steffen R. Mueller wrote:
Thus spake Adam Shand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hi.
Hi Adam,
Sorry for the follow-up post so soon after. I managed to find a copy of
the old libg++ 2.7.1 that I needed on the September 1996 Infomagic CD.
For anyone interested if you
12 matches
Mail list logo
