ES == Erik Steffl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ES if you have enough $$ go with ibm 390 (or whatever the number is)
ES otherwise try wmware (or other similar product), if you require
ES completely virtual machines (hw and all) you need a virtual machine, I
ES guess there's no way
CC == Colin Cashman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No. chroot is not safe enough. I want to create virtual boxes in which
I can give root rights to other people and I want to be sure that they
can't break other boxes.
AGAIK if you have root you can escape chroot'ed
if you have enough $$ go with ibm 390 (or whatever the number is)
otherwise try wmware (or other similar product), if you require
completely virtual machines (hw and all) you need a virtual machine, I
guess there's no way around it, chroot and I suspect jail (I don't know
jail) would not cut it.
Hi,
I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
capabilities as FreeBSD's jails). The only thing I know about is
user-mode linux kernel. Does anybody had experience with it? How
stable is it? Is there any
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 05:03:16PM +0300, Ilya Martynov wrote:
I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
capabilities as FreeBSD's jails). The only thing I know about is
user-mode linux kernel. Does
DS == Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DS On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 05:03:16PM +0300, Ilya Martynov wrote:
I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
capabilities as FreeBSD's
Not knowing about *BSD's jails I'm not sure if you want to
restrict a user to only one part of the filesystem why not use
chroot?
-- Original Message --
From: Ilya Martynov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 Mar 2001 17:03:16 +0300
Hi,
I'm interested if there is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
No. chroot is not safe enough. I want to create virtual boxes in which
I can give root rights to other people and I want to be sure that they
can't break other boxes.
The closest Linux
No. chroot is not safe enough. I want to create virtual boxes in which
I can give root rights to other people and I want to be sure that they
can't break other boxes.
AGAIK if you have root you can escape chroot'ed directory. Another
problems that root can have direct access to devices. I
Colin Cashman wrote:
VSD creates replicas of a working GNU Linux file system and uses this as a
template for Virtual Servers. The replica files (not the
entire OS) are 'hardlinked' to the original image, and share the same inode
as the original file (which saves disk space). Each
replica is
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 10:15:57AM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
Not knowing about *BSD's jails I'm not sure if you want to
restrict a user to only one part of the filesystem why not use
chroot?
Because root can break out of a chroot().
Trivially.
It's not related to devices, like some seem to
On Thursday 15 March 2001 08:03, Ilya Martynov wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested if there is exists some software which allows to
implement virtual boxes under Linux (something that provide simular
capabilities as FreeBSD's jails). The only thing I know about is
user-mode linux kernel. Does anybody
12 matches
Mail list logo
