On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:14:00 +1200
Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Chris,
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:51:07PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
The Prisoner - Patrick McGoohan.
Congratulations.
10pts
Cheers, Chris.
--
Regards _
/ ) The blindingly obvious is
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:51:07PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:44:53 +1200
Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Chris,
No man is an Island. I'm not a number I'm a free man!
10pts for the program and the actor.
The Prisoner - Patrick McGoohan.
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 09:56:32AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
/The Prisoner/, Patrick McGoohan. Google makes this kind of thing
too easy.
Ooops
-1000pts
--
Chris.
==
If you are not subscribed, ask to be CC'd as the Policy of this list is
to reply to the list only.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:45:22PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008, Brad Rogers wrote:
unfulfilling. Patrick McGoohan always maintains there's more to it
than that. He refuses, however, to be drawn on the subject. Which,
in itself is just as weird. :-)
No, it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 09:44, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yes, it is an attack on the language, since the other discussion (in
terms of software) is a matter of degree and freedom
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 03:18:23PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yes, it is an attack on the language, since the other discussion (in
terms of software) is a matter of degree and freedom is slavery is
dealing with exact opposites. (Where have I heard that phrase about
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 02:44:53 +1200
Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Chris,
No man is an Island. I'm not a number I'm a free man!
10pts for the program and the actor.
The Prisoner - Patrick McGoohan.
--
Regards _
/ ) The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:56:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
/The Prisoner/, Patrick McGoohan. Google makes this kind of thing
too easy.
I didn't need Google; I watched it as a kid. Sheesh, I'm starting to
feel old again. :-(
--
Regards _
/ )
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 10:06, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:56:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
/The Prisoner/, Patrick McGoohan. Google makes this kind of thing
too easy.
I didn't need Google; I watched it as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 10:31, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:18:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
I watched it as a teenager (because PBS didn't run it in the late
60s, and I wouldn't have cared, even if they did), but
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 04:31:28PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
Frankly, I don't know what I saw in it when I was
younger. It was just weird.
Yes, it was. Wasn't that the point?
--
News aggregation meets world domination. Can you see the fnews?
http://seethefnews.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:18:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
I watched it as a teenager (because PBS didn't run it in the late
60s, and I wouldn't have cared, even if they did), but didn't obsess
over it.
Nor me, TBH. I did try watching it a few years ago when they did
On Sunday 06 April 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/06/08 10:31, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:18:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
I watched it as a teenager (because PBS didn't run it in the late
60s, and I wouldn't have cared, even if they did),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 10:44, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/06/08 10:31, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:18:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
I watched it as a teenager (because PBS
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:40:09 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
Preferences change... My children *love* the same movies and
True, but The Prisoner was not really aimed at a young (i.e.
pre-teen) audience.
cartoons that I liked when I was young, but now they just bore me
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 10:56:10 -0500
Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dave,
younger. It was just weird.
Yes, it was. Wasn't that the point?
To a degree, yes. In the end, if that's all it is, then it's
unfulfilling. Patrick McGoohan always maintains there's more to it
than that.
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 13:11:37 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
Since it's obvious that pre-teen don't get /The Prisoner/, next time
I guess I'd better not give such broad examples of changing taste.
:-)
OTOH, ti was the obvious choice, given the genesis of this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 11:20, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:40:09 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
Preferences change... My children *love* the same movies and
True, but The Prisoner was not really aimed at a young
On Sunday 06 April 2008, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 10:56:10 -0500
Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dave,
younger. It was just weird.
Yes, it was. Wasn't that the point?
To a degree, yes. In the end, if that's all it is, then it's
unfulfilling. Patrick
On Sunday 06 April 2008 09:02:41 am Ron Johnson wrote:
And the 1933 /King Kong/, the BW /Secret Garden/ (which my 8yo
daughter likes), and the live action Disney movies from the late 50s
thru mid 70s like /The Shaggy Dog/, /Flubber/, /The World's
Strongest Man/, /Escape From Witch Mountain/
On Sunday 06 April 2008 08:18:32 am Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/06/08 10:06, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:56:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
/The Prisoner/, Patrick McGoohan. Google makes this kind of thing
too easy.
I didn't need Google; I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 15:53, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 08:18:32 am Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/06/08 10:06, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:56:32 -0500
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Ron,
/The Prisoner/, Patrick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 15:56, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 09:02:41 am Ron Johnson wrote:
And the 1933 /King Kong/, the BW /Secret Garden/ (which my 8yo
daughter likes), and the live action Disney movies from the late 50s
thru mid 70s like
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 09:02:41 am Ron Johnson wrote:
And the 1933 /King Kong/, the BW /Secret Garden/ (which my 8yo
daughter likes), and the live action Disney movies from the late 50s
thru mid 70s like /The Shaggy Dog/, /Flubber/, /The World's
Strongest Man/, /Escape
On Sunday 06 April 2008 02:18:18 pm John C. Ellingboe wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 09:02:41 am Ron Johnson wrote:
And the 1933 /King Kong/, the BW /Secret Garden/ (which my 8yo
daughter likes), and the live action Disney movies from the late 50s
thru mid 70s like /The
Great OT thread. Yes, no flaming.
Last time it was like this, Etch was almost ready...
I'm trying to remember the last real Etch problem (as opposed to Lenny
or Sid questions) other than those where the answer was to remove
network-manager :)
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:59:45PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Not really, since I didn't become a teenager until the mid-70s.
I thought you were an old fart. You're my age. I was born in 66.
Oh, wait a minute...
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 09:08:23PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:59:45PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Not really, since I didn't become a teenager until the mid-70s.
I thought you were an old fart. You're my age. I was born in 66.
Oh, wait a minute...
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 08:23:20PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Great OT thread. Yes, no flaming.
Last time it was like this, Etch was almost ready...
so now we can twiddle our thumbs, go on random OT rants and rest
assured that lenny will be out any time. When's the next utnubu due
out?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 20:08, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 03:59:45PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Not really, since I didn't become a teenager until the mid-70s.
I thought you were an old fart. You're my age. I was born in 66.
Oh,
Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yes, it is an attack on the language, since the other discussion (in
terms of software) is a matter of degree and freedom is slavery is
dealing with exact opposites. (Where have I heard that phrase about
freedom and slavery before?...)
Freedom is Slavery : Slogan in 1984
On Saturday 05 April 2008 01:18:23 pm Mark Allums wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
Yes, it is an attack on the language, since the other discussion (in
terms of software) is a matter of degree and freedom is slavery is
dealing with exact opposites. (Where have I heard that phrase about
freedom
32 matches
Mail list logo
