, pero llegados a la compilación me dice que el
kernel se compiló con la versión de gcc 4.2.2 y que la que hay actualmente
instalada es la 4.2.3 y puede dar problemas, que si deseo continuar o no.
Evidentemente, como no podía ser de otra manera, la compilación casca... :-(
¿Cual sería la forma legal
digo que me lo genere, pero llegados a la compilación me dice que el
kernel se compiló con la versión de gcc 4.2.2 y que la que hay
actualmente instalada es la 4.2.3 y puede dar problemas, que si deseo
continuar o no.
Evidentemente, como no podía ser de otra manera, la compilación casca
la versión de kernel que tengo instalada y que si
deseo generarla.
Le digo que me lo genere, pero llegados a la compilación me dice que el
kernel se compiló con la versión de gcc 4.2.2 y que la que hay
actualmente instalada es la 4.2.3 y puede dar problemas, que si deseo
continuar o
kernel se compiló con la versión de gcc 4.2.2 y que la que hay
actualmente instalada es la 4.2.3 y puede dar problemas, que si deseo
continuar o no.
Evidentemente, como no podía ser de otra manera, la compilación ca
sca...
:-(
¿Cual sería la forma legal de hacer un downgrade del gcc, si es
que
://wiki.debian.org/VMware
El instalador de VMware está dando problemas en otras distribuciones, no
es la primera queja que leo.
(...)
¿Cual sería la forma legal de hacer un downgrade del gcc, si es que
la
hay?. Por lo menos por comprobar si el problema es el gcc.
No, por favor, no hagas eso, que te
I have written some C code that appeared to be good until I put
a while statement in to one of the modules and then all went to
at least Purgatory. It all compiles beautifully but I was
alerted to something terribly wrong when the program began
misbehaving. I can't even say that it is flaky
On 20/08/2010 3:01 p, Martin McCormick wrote:
I have written some C code that appeared to be good until I put
a while statement in to one of the modules and then all went to
at least Purgatory. It all compiles beautifully but I was
alerted to something terribly wrong when the program began
On 08/20/2010 08:01 AM, Martin McCormick wrote:
I have written some C code that appeared to be good until I put
a while statement in to one of the modules and then all went to
at least Purgatory. It all compiles beautifully but I was
alerted to something terribly wrong when the program began
On 2010-08-20 08:01:46 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
[...]
Reading about the while loop tells me that the statement
Actually, that's an expression, not a statement.
after while must be true to execute. If I put a boolean variable
inside the statement as in (NEXTSYS) does that make a
Jangita writes:
Not a question for this list but
Sorry.
1. Is there any statement in the while loop that changes NEXTSYS? (or
better still, send any statement that has NEXTSYS in it while inside the
loop)
Yes! I didn't even think about that but there is a test inside
that loop whose result
Martin McCormick wrote:
I have written some C code that appeared to be good until I put
a while statement in to one of the modules and then all went to
at least Purgatory. It all compiles beautifully but I was
alerted to something terribly wrong when the program began
misbehaving. I can't even
Jangita writes:
Not a question for this list but
Sorry.
1. Is there any statement in the while loop that changes NEXTSYS? (or
better still, send any statement that has NEXTSYS in it while inside the
loop)
Yes! I didn't even think about that but there is a test inside
that loop whose result
On 20/08/2010 3:43 p, Martin McCormick wrote:
Jangita writes:
Not a question for this list but
Sorry.
1. Is there any statement in the while loop that changes NEXTSYS? (or
better still, send any statement that has NEXTSYS in it while inside the
loop)
Yes! I didn't even think about that
Hi, there,
is there a sufficient reason why it's not in lenny.
I tried to compile but neither 4.3 nor 4.2 would compile 3.3
I finally downloaded pre-compiled version from etch in debs and installed
them. I then could compile my old program
What's the best way to go for the future?
regards
testing.
gcc -v shows:
gcc version 4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-6)
$ cat t.c
void foo(void) {
bar();
}
$ gcc -Wall -Werror t.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
t.c: In function â:
t.c:2: error: implicit declaration of function â
I expect something closer to:
cc1: warnings being treated
will immediately recognize the problem as ``Oh yes,
you need ... ''
I'd suspect some locale issue.
Running testing.
gcc -v shows:
gcc version 4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-6)
$ cat t.c
void foo(void) {
bar();
}
$ gcc -Wall -Werror t.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
t.c: In function â:
t.c:2
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Kumar Appaiah
a.ku...@alumni.iitm.ac.in wrote:
Could you please try running LC_ALL=C gcc -Wall -Werror t.c and let us
know if that solves the issue?
Yup. That did it. Thanks for the quick analysis.
LANG= gcc ...
had the same effect.
That's what I get
installs along the way.) Just go back to C?
Just capturing more information.
Apparently every gcc-4.* has this same issue. gcc-3.4 does not.
I always thought that part of the joy of the way GNU did translations
was that, if it wasn't available, it would always fall back to the
strings written
On 2009-12-02 21:35 +0100, Mike Castle wrote:
I guess this boils down to: is this a bug in gcc or a bug in my set up?
Probably there is something wrong on your system, because gcc works as
expected in your example here:
,
| % LANG=en_US.UTF-8 gcc -Wall -Werror t.c
| cc1: warnings being
difference:
$ LANG=en_US.utf8 gcc -Werror -Wall t.c 21 | od -c
000 c c 1 : w a r n i n g s b e
020 i n g t r e a t e d a s e
040 r r o r s \n t . c : I n f u
060 n c t i
Hi,
So Im done with my test package and want to change a few things in gcc..
But I have a slight problem ..
dpkg -l |grep gcc
r...@wrapster:~/packaging/gcc/gcc-defaults-1.78ubuntu1/debian# dpkg -l
|grep gcc
ri gcc
4:4.3.3-1ubuntu1
09/22/2009 10:17 AM, shampavman:
So i cannot remove it nor can i install the new ones.. How do i go about
making my changes now?
- get the source package
- make your modifications
- rebuild it, incrementing the build number
- upgrade by just installing with dpkg -i package_name.deb
--
-i package_name.deb
Thats exactly what I did.. But there is a small issue i need to understand..
There are more than one pkg(gcc, gcc-4.3, so on)
And in such a case how am i suppose to know which pkg sources to collect?
What I want to do is to actually create a few symlinks to gcc.
Now i tried
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:47:28PM +0530, shampavman wrote:
Hi,
So Im done with my test package and want to change a few things in gcc..
But I have a slight problem ..
playing with gcc is not some novice thing I can answer.
dpkg -l |grep gcc
r...@wrapster:~/packaging/gcc/gcc-defaults
that: LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not
needed when later running the built software due to libtool's use of
rpaths).
So,what is the right way to tell gcc (make) to use one or another library
path when your system has two installed, one of which under /usr/lib and
so will probably be used by default ?
I
://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/unstable/gtk-building.html I am
compiling all the code under /opt (/opt/gtk /opt/glib).
When I try to compile the software which need those libraries I seem to be
just not able to tell gcc that it needs to compile against libraries under
/opt and not against the system
lenny, up-to-date:
uname -a
Linux 2.6.26-2-686 #1 SMP
ii gcc-4.3
4.3.2-1.1 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.3-base
4.3.2-1.1 The GNU Compiler Collection
in the future. When you
have
a problem not already discussed here, write a new message instead
of
replying to an unrelated one.
I appreciate your reply, but I don't believe I hijacked a thread.
Install gcc is my original subject line that started the thread,
yes?
No, look at the References header
On Thu, August 27, 2009 7:48 pm, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:18:28 -0500 (CDT)
David Young inf...@io.com wrote:
I installed gcc 4.3 using Synaptic, and the process seemed to have
succeeded. However, when I enter the gcc -v command, I get a bash:
gcc: command not found error
[Please reply only to the list and don't cc. me, as per the list CoC.]
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:49:08 -0500 (CDT)
David Young inf...@io.com wrote:
On Thu, August 27, 2009 7:48 pm, Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:18:28 -0500 (CDT)
David Young inf...@io.com wrote:
I installed gcc 4.3
...@io.com wrote:
I installed gcc 4.3 using Synaptic, and the process seemed to
have
succeeded. However, when I enter the gcc -v command, I get a
bash:
gcc: command not found error.
Exactly what package(s) did you install?
Here's the Synaptic log entry --
Installed the following
On 2009-08-28 02:18 +0200, David Young wrote:
I installed gcc 4.3 using Synaptic, and the process seemed to have
succeeded. However, when I enter the gcc -v command, I get a bash:
gcc: command not found error.
Is there additional configuration to be done beyond the package install
On Fri, August 28, 2009 8:52 am, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-08-28 02:18 +0200, David Young wrote:
I installed gcc 4.3 using Synaptic, and the process seemed to have
succeeded. However, when I enter the gcc -v command, I get a bash:
gcc: command not found error.
Is there additional
reply, but I don't believe I hijacked a thread.
Install gcc is my original subject line that started the thread,
yes?
No, look at the References header in your message¹. When starting a
new thread, this header does not exist, because there are no messages
you are referring to.
Hitting Reply all
of
replying to an unrelated one.
I appreciate your reply, but I don't believe I hijacked a thread.
Install gcc is my original subject line that started the thread,
yes?
No, look at the References header in your message¹. When starting a
new thread, this header does not exist, because
a problem not already discussed here, write a new message instead
of
replying to an unrelated one.
I appreciate your reply, but I don't believe I hijacked a thread.
Install gcc is my original subject line that started the thread,
yes?
No, look at the References header in your message
I'm trying to build something in Debian Lenny (x86 32-bit) from old
source code that needs gcc 3.3 but the oldest version I see in the
repository is 3.4. Is there any way to get packages for gcc versions
older than 3.4 under Lenny?
Thanks,
Dave
--
Dave Parker
Utica College
On 2009-08-27 19:24 +0200, David A. Parker wrote:
I'm trying to build something in Debian Lenny (x86 32-bit) from old
source code that needs gcc 3.3 but the oldest version I see in the
repository is 3.4. Is there any way to get packages for gcc versions
older than 3.4 under Lenny?
Surely
I installed gcc 4.3 using Synaptic, and the process seemed to have
succeeded. However, when I enter the gcc -v command, I get a bash:
gcc: command not found error.
Is there additional configuration to be done beyond the package install?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:18:28 -0500 (CDT)
David Young inf...@io.com wrote:
I installed gcc 4.3 using Synaptic, and the process seemed to have
succeeded. However, when I enter the gcc -v command, I get a bash:
gcc: command not found error.
Exactly what package(s) did you install
Hello all,
just a little existential question:
I wonder why Debian needs three versions of the GCC compiler: 4.1, 4.2,
and 4.3? Shouldn't one be enough? Is it because the compiler has no
down-compatibility?
Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
simon h skrev:
I wonder why Debian needs three versions of the GCC compiler: 4.1, 4.2,
and 4.3? Shouldn't one be enough? Is it because the compiler has no
down-compatibility?
I think that is the reason, yes. I also think that lack of manpower is
the reason there are not even more (older
Johan Grönqvist wrote:
simon h skrev:
I wonder why Debian needs three versions of the GCC compiler: 4.1, 4.2,
and 4.3? Shouldn't one be enough? Is it because the compiler has no
down-compatibility?
I think that is the reason, yes. I also think that lack of manpower is
the reason
Johan Grönqvist wrote:
simon h skrev:
I wonder why Debian needs three versions of the GCC compiler: 4.1, 4.2,
and 4.3? Shouldn't one be enough? Is it because the compiler has no
down-compatibility?
I think that is the reason, yes. I also think that lack of manpower is
the reason
Tive uma surpresa ao receber um:
$man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
Depois vi que teria que instalar o gcc-doc.
E minha surpresa foi maior quando tive que adicionar os reps non-free pra
esse pacote.
Andei desligado do mundo mas.. WTF?
Por que a documentação do gcc está no non-free?
--
[]s
Erick Andrade wrote:
Tive uma surpresa ao receber um:
$man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
Depois vi que teria que instalar o gcc-doc.
E minha surpresa foi maior quando tive que adicionar os reps non-free pra
esse pacote.
Andei desligado do mundo mas.. WTF?
Por que a documentação do gcc está
Lambança.. esse negócio de seções invariantes é uma besteira.
Daqui um tempo até o kernel vai estar no non-free.
O Debian tá certo, mas quem perde são os usuários.
Valeu Hudson!
--
[]s
Erick Andrade
2009/6/29 Hudson Lacerda h...@brfree.com.br
Porque a licença GNU FDL não é considerada
Erick Andrade wrote:
Lambança.. esse negócio de seções invariantes é uma besteira.
Daqui um tempo até o kernel vai estar no non-free.
A propósito, eu sou a favor...
http://www.fsfla.org/svnwiki/blogs/lxo/pub/linux-libre
http://www.fsfla.org/svnwiki/selibre/linux-libre/
O Debian tá certo,
Valeu pelos links.. e a idéia com certeza é válida.
--
[]s
Erick Andrade
2009/6/29 Hudson Lacerda h...@brfree.com.br
Erick Andrade wrote:
Lambança.. esse negócio de seções invariantes é uma besteira.
Daqui um tempo até o kernel vai estar no non-free.
A propósito, eu sou a favor...
Olá,
De inicio fiquei mesmo confuso !!!
Pois, então a unica forma de ter um kernel linux limpo é sacar de
http://www.fsfla.org/download/linux-libre/releases/
compilar e instalar ?
Então porque não existe já empacutado .deb e não dão a opção de instalar
um (actual) ou outro (livre) ?
Abraço
Debiminho wrote:
Olá,
De inicio fiquei mesmo confuso !!!
Pois, então a unica forma de ter um kernel linux limpo é sacar de
http://www.fsfla.org/download/linux-libre/releases/
compilar e instalar ?
Então porque não existe já empacutado .deb e não dão a opção de instalar
um (actual) ou outro
Hi, everyone
I'm using gcc-avr in etch.
If I upgrade my debian to lenny and wish to use gcc-avr etch version not
lenny version,
how can I install gcc-avr and avr other package of etch in lenny
environment?
Regards,
J.H.Kim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
2009/6/17 J.Hwan.Kim frog1...@gmail.com
Hi, everyone
I'm using gcc-avr in etch.
If I upgrade my debian to lenny and wish to use gcc-avr etch version not
lenny version,
how can I install gcc-avr and avr other package of etch in lenny
environment?
maybe apt pinnning can be of use
Has anyone noticed any problems with Lenny's gcc 4.3.2? Okay, I know
it's impossible.
But I'm imagining that I see a ${SOMETHING} in CFLAGS in the Makefile
not being expanded on Lenny amd64 when it is set in the environment,
but the identical code working (oops, being expanded) on an older
non
On 2009-05-13 21:43:14 +0930, Miguel Obliviemo wrote:
Has anyone noticed any problems with Lenny's gcc 4.3.2? Okay, I know
it's impossible.
Yes: it is buggy. In particular, it doesn't build GMP 4.3.0 correctly
(I haven't looked at GMP 4.3.1 yet under lenny). The bug has been
fixed upstream
In pine.lnx.4.64.0905132131530.23...@calypso.view.net.au, Miguel Obliviemo
wrote:
Has anyone noticed any problems with Lenny's gcc 4.3.2? Okay, I know
it's impossible.
But I'm imagining that I see a ${SOMETHING} in CFLAGS in the Makefile
not being expanded on Lenny amd64 when it is set
, it will be changed to -2 to reflect that there is a
break in the binary compatibility. The -6 is a patch level, or point
release, and reflects the 2.6.xx.yy version.
AIUI, the -x (where x is any number) is the Debian version of a package,
e.g. the diference between gcc 4.3.3-2 and 4.3.3-3
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:37:47AM -0700, shaul Karl wrote:
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 were set up.
^^
typo?
To add
On 2009-03-24 13:03 +0100, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:37:47AM -0700, shaul Karl wrote:
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 were set up
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 was set up.
Which version do I have?
To add to my confusion, I seem to remember that the head of
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/changelog.Debian.gz pointed to
4.3.3-3 before the mentioned
shaul Karl wrote:
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 was set up.
Which version do I have?
To add to my confusion, I seem to remember that the head of
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/changelog.Debian.gz pointed to
4.3.3-3
dpkg (dpkg -l gcc-4.3) reports that 4.3.3-3 is installed.
The latest entry in /var/log/apt/term reports 4:4.3.3-2 were set up.
To add to my confusion, I seem to remember that the head of
/usr/share/doc/gcc-4.3/changelog.Debian.gz pointed to 4.3.3-3 before the
mentioned entry in var/log/apt/term
Hola,
¿Alguno sabría decirme como puedo preguntar a gcc que $CFLAGS tiene
configurados por defecto?
Lo más próximo que he encontrado gcc -dumpspecs o gcc -v pero
ninguno me dice que -march o -mcpu es el de por defecto.
Saludos
--
Héctor Orón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Learning MIPS ISA using GCC and Debian
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:19:59 -0700
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:55:03 -0400
Jerry Stuckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say that is one of the worst
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:05:33PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hi there,
I do not understand what I am doing wrong. I would like to install a
power-ppc gcc compiler on my debian testing box. I found a simple page
for gentoo: http://psas.pdx.edu/GentooCrossCompilerHowto/, and I
I am learning the MIPS ISA in class and I guess the best way to learn
this is using real world examples. Thus, I was hoping I could write a
program in C and compile it into MIPS assembly and learn the MIPS ISA
that way.
I am not too familiar with gcc but I have used it and I also know
was hoping I could write a
program in C and compile it into MIPS assembly and learn the MIPS ISA
that way.
I am not too familiar with gcc but I have used it and I also know that
objdump tool can be used to disassemble C programs. However, I am not
sure how to cross-compile into MIPS.
I apologize
On 10/19/08 19:39, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
I am learning the MIPS ISA in class and I guess the best way to learn
this is using real world examples. Thus, I was hoping I could write a
program in C and compile it into MIPS assembly and learn the MIPS ISA
that way.
I am not too familiar with gcc
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:55:03 -0400
Jerry Stuckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say that is one of the worst ways to learn MIPS. A good
compiler will have numerous optimizations, and the resultant code may
bear little resemblance to the original C. Even if you disable all
it into MIPS assembly and learn the MIPS ISA
that way.
I am not too familiar with gcc but I have used it and I also know that
objdump tool can be used to disassemble C programs. However, I am not
sure how to cross-compile into MIPS.
I apologize if this question is too obvious.
Running
Hi there,
I do not understand what I am doing wrong. I would like to install a
power-ppc gcc compiler on my debian testing box. I found a simple page
for gentoo: http://psas.pdx.edu/GentooCrossCompilerHowto/, and I was
interested to do the same. I do have qemu installed, but I simply
can't get
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Guillermo Salas M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El sáb, 11-10-2008 a las 03:40 -0700, xploiting escribió:
Hola lista, estoy aprendiendo a utilizar la librería GTK.
Tengo instalado libgtk2.0-dev, y cuando compilo el programa, gcc me
avisa que no encuentra gtk/gtk.h
El Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
xploiting [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola lista, estoy aprendiendo a utilizar la librería GTK.
Tengo instalado libgtk2.0-dev, y cuando compilo el programa, gcc me
avisa que no encuentra gtk/gtk.h.
El mensaje de error es exactamente
El sáb, 11-10-2008 a las 03:40 -0700, xploiting escribió:
Hola lista, estoy aprendiendo a utilizar la librería GTK.
Tengo instalado libgtk2.0-dev, y cuando compilo el programa, gcc me
avisa que no encuentra gtk/gtk.h.
El mensaje de error es exactamente: ventana_simple.c:2:21: error:
gtk
Hola lista, estoy aprendiendo a utilizar la librería GTK.
Tengo instalado libgtk2.0-dev, y cuando compilo el programa, gcc me
avisa que no encuentra gtk/gtk.h.
El mensaje de error es exactamente: ventana_simple.c:2:21: error:
gtk/gtk.h: No existe el fichero o el directorio
¿Alguien sabe
El sáb, 11-10-2008 a las 03:40 -0700, xploiting escribió:
Hola lista, estoy aprendiendo a utilizar la librería GTK.
Tengo instalado libgtk2.0-dev, y cuando compilo el programa, gcc me
avisa que no encuentra gtk/gtk.h.
El mensaje de error es exactamente: ventana_simple.c:2:21: error:
gtk
Hola gente, quería saber si alguien me puede ayudar por que tengo
problemas al compilar con gcc tanto el 4.3 como el 4.2 y el 4.1, el
kernel que tengo actualmente es el 2.6.25-2, el debian es testing, y el
error que me tiraba antes es
gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No existe el
2008/8/23 Dalmasso Pablo N [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hola gente, quería saber si alguien me puede ayudar por que tengo
problemas al compilar con gcc tanto el 4.3 como el 4.2 y el 4.1, el
kernel que tengo actualmente es el 2.6.25-2, el debian es testing, y el
error que me tiraba antes es
gcc: error
El lun, 19-05-2008 a las 22:31 -0400, Santiago Yegros escribió:
Acabo de bajarme e instalarme el etch AMD64, ya todavia tenia el viejo
Sarge...
Bueno.. lo raro es que necesitaba usar unos programas hechos en C y
luego de instalar los packetes de gcc, no puedo compilarlos.. es
decir.. al
Acabo de bajarme e instalarme el etch AMD64, ya todavia tenia el viejo Sarge...
Bueno.. lo raro es que necesitaba usar unos programas hechos en C y
luego de instalar los packetes de gcc, no puedo compilarlos.. es
decir.. al compilarlos me despiega un error.. como este:
programa.c:2:19: error
Instalaste build-essential, kernel-headers, gcc y
demas?
Saludos!
--- Santiago Yegros [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
Acabo de bajarme e instalarme el etch AMD64, ya
todavia tenia el viejo Sarge...
Bueno.. lo raro es que necesitaba usar unos
programas hechos en C y
luego de instalar los
Hello, list.
Is there a way/program to guess gcc version used for compilation of some
debian package ?
Best regards
Georgi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Hello, list.
Is there a way/program to guess gcc version used for compilation of some
debian package ?
I am not aware of any such program. But if all you wanted to know is the gcc
version used, then you can take a look at the build logs provided at
http
Thank you for the answers.
I want to use something like strings from binutils packages, something like
strings binary_file | grep gcc
, but seem that these strings are removed from binaries.
Best regards
Georgi
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
Hello, list
I set up gcc,gcc-4.1 using apt,which installed the necessary packages
(I think) and now running the configure script of opensource
software(not in Debian) I have this message:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables,see
config.log for more details.
I cannot find any file
Luca Renaud wrote:
I set up gcc,gcc-4.1 using apt,which installed the necessary packages
(I think) and now running the configure script of opensource
software(not in Debian) I have this message:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables,see
config.log for more details.
I cannot
Luca Renaud wrote:
I set up gcc,gcc-4.1 using apt,which installed the necessary packages
(I think) and now running the configure script of opensource
software(not in Debian) I have this message:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables,see
config.log for more details.
I
Luca Renaud wrote:
I set up gcc,gcc-4.1 using apt,which installed the necessary packages
(I think) and now running the configure script of opensource
software(not in Debian) I have this message:
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables,see
config.log for more details.
I cannot
hhding wrote:
It seems ln /usr/bin/gcc is not a clean way.
You can just use gcc-version_number where ever you are using gcc before.
If you are configuring source, you can do something like
./configure CC=gcc-version_number
hth
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages
It seems ln /usr/bin/gcc is not a clean way.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hhding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems ln /usr/bin/gcc is not a clean way.
Change your CC environmental variable to the version you want, as
$ export CC=gcc-4.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
try info gcc and see what happens.
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Michael Madden wrote:
I'm having problems viewing manpages for gcc on Debian 4.0 r3 i386. Other
manpages work just fine.
:~$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available
I'm having problems viewing manpages for gcc on Debian 4.0 r3 i386.
Other manpages work just fine.
:~$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.
:~$ man g++
No manual entry for g++
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages
Michael Madden wrote:
I'm having problems viewing manpages for gcc on Debian 4.0 r3 i386.
Other manpages work just fine.
:~$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.
:~$ man g++
No manual entry for g++
See 'man 7 undocumented
Michael Madden([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
I'm having problems viewing manpages for gcc on Debian 4.0 r3 i386.
Other manpages work just fine.
:~$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.
:~$ man g++
No manual
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 07:10:04AM -0600, Michael Madden wrote:
I'm having problems viewing manpages for gcc on Debian 4.0 r3 i386.
Other manpages work just fine.
:~$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
Do you have the manpages-dev package installed?
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when
On 2008-02-21 16:16 +0100, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
gcc-doc is in main.
No, it is in contrib. I just looked at packages.debian.org:
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=gcc-docsearchon=namessuite=allsection=allsourceid=mozilla-search
My guess would be that gcc-doc[version
Hola, actualmente veo que tengo varios GCC instalados (por dependencias y
demas que se instalaron solos)
# dpkg -l|grep gcc
ii gcc 4:4.2.2-2 The GNU C
compiler
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.6-15 The GNU
no te trae problemas,
si eres programador te sirve para ver que problemas te arroja al
compilar un mismo fuente en distintas versiones del compilador, ademas
de ver cual te genera un codigo mas optimo, etc.
ps: sorry se me fue un mensaje a tu email y no a la lista :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 06:36:32PM +0100, aux wrote:
Hola, actualmente veo que tengo varios GCC instalados (por dependencias y
demas que se instalaron solos)
# dpkg -l|grep gcc
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.6-15 The GNU
Compiler Collection (base package
301 - 400 of 2377 matches
Mail list logo
