2008/2/18, aux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hola, actualmente veo que tengo varios GCC instalados (por dependencias y
demas que se instalaron solos)
# dpkg -l|grep gcc
ii gcc 4:4.2.2-2 The GNU C
compiler
ii gcc-3.3-base 1
ii gcc 4:4.2.2-2 The
GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.1 4.1.2-18 The
GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.2 4.2.3-1The
GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.3
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 07:21:16PM +0100, aux wrote:
ii gcc 4:4.2.2-2 The
GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.1 4.1.2-18 The
GNU C compiler
ii gcc-4.2 4.2.3-1
toute neuve (CD businesscard daté du 4 janvier) en
'unstable' avec le noyau du moment : 2.6.23.1_amd64.
Or, l'installeur de NVidia me dit que le noyau a été compilé en gcc
v4.1 et qu'il aurait besoin de la même version pour créer son module.
Etant en 'unstable', j'ai une version de gcc qui est la
Bonjour,
Gcc-4.1 pour amd64 est présent dans les dépôts d'unstable
(http://packages.debian.org/sid/gcc-4.1).
Il faut donc installer cette version en laissant la 4.2 d'installée.
Ensuite, avant de lancer le .run, faire un export CC=gcc-4.1.
Cdlt.
Le 08/01/08, David BERCOT[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re-bonjour,
En effet, je n'ai pas pensé à ça (le contre-coup des fêtes peut
être ;-))). Merci (ainsi qu'à Basile !!!).
David.
Le Tue, 8 Jan 2008 09:35:08 +0100,
Stéphane L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Bonjour,
Gcc-4.1 pour amd64 est présent dans les dépôts d'unstable
(http
David BERCOT, mardi 8 janvier 2008, 09:26:19 CET
Bonjour,
’jour,
Comme hier, je n'ai pas eu de succès avec ma question, j'en
tente une autre ;-)
Pff, un seul jour d’attente et on s’impatiente…
J'ai donc essayé d'installer les drivers non-libres de NVidia
via le .run fourni sur leur
Le 08/01/08, Sylvain Sauvage[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
J'ai donc essayé d'installer les drivers non-libres de NVidia
via le .run fourni sur leur site web.
Mauvaise idée, mauvaise méthode, surtout en unstable.
Chacun fait comme il veut, non ?
On l'a déjà dit maintes fois:
— il y a
-glx)
Après une m.à.j. du noyau, on refait un m-a a-i (voir option
-l si on veut le faire avant de rebouter).
Alors hier, j'ai essayé ça... Mais ça m'a complètement planté X.
Peut-être, là encore, était-ce dû à la version de gcc utilisé
(différente de celle utilisée pour le noyau) ?
En
-assistant
# m-a a-i nvidia
[…]
Alors hier, j'ai essayé ça... Mais ça m'a complètement planté
X. Peut-être, là encore, était-ce dû à la version de gcc
utilisé (différente de celle utilisée pour le noyau) ?
Ben on pourra difficilement savoir sans information (log de
Xorg, etc.).
En tenant
Como eu posso instalar o gcc (e as devidas libs que vêm com ele no pacote
build-essential) em um computador sem internet?
há alguma maneira de eu criar um .deb com todas as informações que o
build-essential baixaria e levá-lo para o outro pc e executálo assim lá?
Obrigado desde já e espero
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28-11-2007 16:53, Rodrigo Sata Godoy wrote:
Como eu posso instalar o gcc (e as devidas libs que vêm com ele no
pacote build-essential) em um computador sem internet?
há alguma maneira de eu criar um .deb com todas as informações que o
build
On 2007-11-23 01:39 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
The description of gcc-3.4-base is:
Description: The GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
This package contains files common to all languages and libraries
contained in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
and this package doesn't depend
The description of gcc-3.4-base is:
Description: The GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
This package contains files common to all languages and libraries
contained in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
and this package doesn't depend on anything. And the contents:
vin:~ dpkg -L gcc-3.4
08:39 ?
00:00:00 /usr/bin/xrdb /etc/X11/xdm/Xresources
root 6667 0 08:39 ?
00:00:00 /usr/bin/cpp -DHOST=MONLINUX -DSERVERHOST=MONLINUX -DSRVR_MONLINUX
-DDISPLAY_NUM=0 -DCLIENTHOST=MONLINUX
root 6668 6667 0 08:39 ?
00:00:00 /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2
Hi,
After I did install Debian using DVD set from CheapBytes,
I found that the gcc is not installed. Looking around what's
the best way to install gcc, I found the 'apt' and did install
the gcc using 'apt-get install gcc', which asked to mount the
DVD1 and then the gcc installation
Bonsoir à tous,
Quelle commande GNU faut-il exécuter pour savoir quelle est la version de
gcc qui est installée.
J'utilise l'ouvrage Le Langage C de B.W KERNIGHAM et D.M RITCHIE pour
mon apprentissage.
Merci à tous.
Cordialement.
Alex PADOLY
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client
Selon Alex PADOLY [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bonsoir à tous,
Bonsoir,
Quelle commande GNU faut-il exécuter pour savoir quelle est la version de
gcc qui est installée.
apt-cache show gcc
J'utilise l'ouvrage Le Langage C de B.W KERNIGHAM et D.M RITCHIE pour
mon apprentissage.
Merci à tous
BOUIDA Djelloul, lundi 2 juillet 2007, 17:24:39 CEST
Selon Alex PADOLY [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bonsoir à tous,
Bonsoir,
’soir,
Quelle commande GNU faut-il exécuter pour savoir quelle est la version de
gcc qui est installée.
apt-cache show gcc
Ou aussi gcc --version
Le lundi 02 juillet 2007 18:26, Alex PADOLY a écrit :
Bonsoir à tous,
Bonsoir,
Quelle commande GNU faut-il exécuter pour savoir quelle est la version de
gcc qui est installée.
gcc --version
La question est propre au compilateur, ça n'a pas de rapport avec le C.
(man gcc lol)
J'utilise
Alex PADOLY wrote:
Bonsoir à tous,
Quelle commande GNU faut-il exécuter pour savoir quelle est la version
de gcc qui est installée.
gcc -v donne non seulement la version, mais les options de build.
J'utilise l'ouvrage Le Langage C de B.W KERNIGHAM et D.M RITCHIE
pour mon apprentissage
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:24:39PM +0100,
BOUIDA Djelloul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
Quelle commande GNU faut-il exécuter pour savoir quelle est la version de
gcc qui est installée.
apt-cache show gcc
Non, cela donne les versions *disponibles*, pas la
Am 2007-05-24 15:13:28, schrieb Roberto C. Sánchez:
Why on earth would you update glibc without just upgrading the rest of
the system?
The half system conflict with 2.5 and an apt-get dist-update will
leave your system unusable... it remove dpkg before glibc 2.5 is
installed! -- Oops!
And of
upgrade interactively.
The -d option is a good idea but my main question still has not been
answered. What wants to *remove* gcc and why?
If this were happening to me, and I *really* cared, I'd use a binary
search algorithm to narrow it down.
Huh? Every individual package I've tried
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:23:58AM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
Currently 'apt-get upgrade' wants to upgrade 289 packages. Rather than
do them all at once, I like to do smaller groups packages. Right now it
seems that for every package I try to upgrade, apt-get wants to REMOVE
gcc yet upgrading
not been
answered. What wants to *remove* gcc and why?
If this were happening to me, and I *really* cared, I'd use a binary
search algorithm to narrow it down.
Huh? Every individual package I've tried to upgrade wants to remove gcc
yet the whole collection does not.
Also, what does it mean
Currently 'apt-get upgrade' wants to upgrade 289 packages. Rather than
do them all at once, I like to do smaller groups packages. Right now it
seems that for every package I try to upgrade, apt-get wants to REMOVE
gcc yet upgrading all the packages at once does not. I don't understand.
Why should
, run
#apt-get upgrade interactively.
Right now it
seems that for every package I try to upgrade, apt-get wants to REMOVE
gcc yet upgrading all the packages at once does not. I don't understand.
Why should upgrading python, for example
and dinner and have a good night's sleep and...
Hugo
Once all the packages are downloaded, run #apt-get
upgrade interactively.
Right now it
seems that for every package I try to upgrade, apt-get wants to REMOVE
gcc yet upgrading all
you
go eat breakfast. Once all the packages are downloaded, run #apt-get
upgrade interactively.
The -d option is a good idea but my main question still has not been
answered. What wants to *remove* gcc and why?
Also, what does it mean to run apt-get upgrade *interactively*?
Right now
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:30:46AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/10/07 08:23, Rick Pasotto wrote:
Currently 'apt-get upgrade' wants to upgrade 289 packages. Rather than
do them all at once, I like to do smaller groups packages.
It will save you time by running #
by running # apt-get -d -y upgrade while you
go eat breakfast. Once all the packages are downloaded, run #apt-get
upgrade interactively.
The -d option is a good idea but my main question still has not been
answered. What wants to *remove* gcc and why?
If this were happening to me, and I *really
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:23:58AM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
Currently 'apt-get upgrade' wants to upgrade 289 packages. Rather than
do them all at once, I like to do smaller groups packages. Right now it
seems that for every package I try to upgrade, apt-get wants to REMOVE
gcc yet upgrading
to *remove* gcc and why?
If this were happening to me, and I *really* cared, I'd use a binary
search algorithm to narrow it down.
Huh? Every individual package I've tried to upgrade wants to remove gcc
yet the whole collection does not.
Also, what does it mean to run apt-get upgrade *interactively
question still has not been
answered. What wants to *remove* gcc and why?
If this were happening to me, and I *really* cared, I'd use a binary
search algorithm to narrow it down.
Huh? Every individual package I've tried to upgrade wants to remove gcc
yet the whole collection does not.
You might
On 5/24/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A combo of Etch Sid? Yech. Definite recipe for trouble.
Are you trying to build Sid source debs on Etch? That *might* work,
but why not then just move to Sid?
I'm trying to, but via the way of the source. I don't have binary
,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
4.1.2.
I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
However, doing wajig build gcc-4.1 complains about absence of
glibc-2.5. How should I proceed?
What branch are you running? Testing/lenny
Am 2007-05-21 07:33:42, schrieb Ron Johnson:
On 05/21/07 05:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
4.1.2.
I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
However, doing wajig build gcc-4.1
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:27:53PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I had the same problem with my Devel-Station and my Laptop to get
glibc 2.5 running. It took me over 2 days to get all dependencies
in the right order.
Why on earth would you update glibc without just upgrading the rest of
On 5/21/07, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/07 05:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
4.1.2.
I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for gcc
On 5/21/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
4.1.2. I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for
gcc-4.1.2. However, doing wajig build gcc-4.1 complains about
to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
4.1.2.
I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
However, doing wajig build gcc-4.1 complains about absence of
glibc-2.5. How should I proceed?
What branch are you running? Testing/lenny?
It's a whole mess actually. There's much
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to 4.1.2.
I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
However, doing wajig build gcc-4.1 complains about absence of
glibc-2.5. How should I proceed?
--
my place on the web:
floss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/07 05:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
4.1.2.
I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
However, doing wajig build gcc-4.1 complains
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
4.1.2. I did wajig build glibc but this results in a request for
gcc-4.1.2. However, doing wajig build gcc-4.1 complains about absence of
glibc-2.5. How should I proceed?
Not sure
galera boa tarde...
Como faço pra instalar o manual do gccpra Debian
Valeu...
-
(o_Marcus Vinícius
//\GNU/Debian
V_/_User #171901
-
__
Fale
Em Sexta 04 Maio 2007 17:36, Marcus Vinícius Liberani escreveu:
galera boa tarde...
Como faço pra instalar o manual do gccpra Debian
aptitude install gcc-docs
?
[]s
--
Davi Vidal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Religion, ideology, resources, land,
spite, love or just because
Marcus Vinícius Liberani escreveu:
galera boa tarde...
Como faço pra instalar o manual do gccpra Debian
Valeu...
-
(o_Marcus Vinícius
//\GNU/Debian
V_/_User #171901
Já, o lance é que eu esqueci que o pacote era gcc-
alguma coisa mas já me responderam: gcc-docs.
Valeu pela força
--- Sergio Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escreveu:
Marcus Vinícius Liberani escreveu:
galera boa tarde...
Como faço pra instalar o manual do gccpra
Debian
Valeu
`/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/include/stddef.h', necessário por
`add_point_to_object.o'. Pare.
alguem sabe me dize como resolvo isso?
Um ABraço
--
---
Joao Gerd Zell de Mattos - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mastership Student - CPTEC/INPE
Centro
`/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.5/include/stddef.h',
necessário por `add_point_to_object.o'. Pare.
alguem sabe me dize como resolvo isso?
Um ABraço
--
---
Joao Gerd Zell de Mattos - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mastership Student - CPTEC/INPE
Centro
= /foo/im/include
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -I$(INCLUDE)
LIBS = $(LIBDIR)/libim.a $(LIBDIR)/libim.so \
-lm -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11
You are linking against libim twice, once static and once dynamic, what you
may mean is
LIBS = -L$(LIBDIR) -lim -lm -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11
On 4/29/07, Cédric Lucantis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le dimanche 29 avril 2007 04:56, Micha Feigin a écrit:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:20:08 -0300
Iuri Sampaio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(BIN): $(OBJS)
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $(BIN) $(OBJS) $(LIBS)
Not really an answer, but this is
Michael Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I'm using GNU make, I hardly ever use = instead of :=, unless I
really want to define a macro. You're a lot more likely to get what
you expect most of the time, and you can use +=.
What's the difference? My book on Make mentions =, but not :=. I
Le dimanche 29 avril 2007 19:40, John L Fjellstad a écrit :
Michael Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I'm using GNU make, I hardly ever use = instead of :=, unless I
really want to define a macro. You're a lot more likely to get what
you expect most of the time, and you can use +=.
Cédric Lucantis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is documented in the make info page, under section 6.5 How to use
variables/Setting. I don't know if this is specific to gnu make or not.
Thanks. I really appreciate the explaination (I looked it up in my make
book, it the book I have was more
Hi,
I tried to compile a C source code, using make command:
The Makefile script is:
BINDIR = ./
LIBDIR = /foo/im/lib/Linux24
INCLUDE = /foo/im/include
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -I$(INCLUDE)
LIBS = $(LIBDIR)/libim.a $(LIBDIR)/libim.so \
-lm -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11
OBJS
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:20:08 -0300
Iuri Sampaio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I tried to compile a C source code, using make command:
The Makefile script is:
BINDIR = ./
LIBDIR = /foo/im/lib/Linux24
INCLUDE = /foo/im/include
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -g -I
instala o gcc
#aptitude install gcc
aí vai resolver seu problema.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hugo Guimarães [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Apr 22, 2007 11:59 AM
Subject: problemas com o gcc
To: Lista Debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Bom dia amigos.
Eu estou
dependências... Pronto
gcc já é a versão mais nova.
0 pacotes atualizados, 0 pacotes novos instalados, 0 a serem
removidos e 0
não atualizados.
É isso que eu nao entendi.
Hugo
Em 22/04/07, Alberto Viana [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
instala o gcc
#aptitude install gcc
aí vai
Bom dia,
Eu estou com um problema na instalação de vários programas e pacotes que
necessitam do pacote gcc instalado na máquina.
Ao dar ./configure o computador mostra essa resposta:
checking for gcc... no
checking for cc... no
configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH
Desculpem, mandei essa mensagem por engano. Apenas desconsiderem-na.
Obrigado.
Em 22/04/07, Hugo Guimarães [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Bom dia,
Eu estou com um problema na instalação de vários programas e pacotes que
necessitam do pacote gcc instalado na máquina.
Ao dar ./configure o
PROTECTED] escreveu:
Alberto,
Mas é como eu mostrei, ao tentar instalar ele diz que o programa já
está
instalado:
Lendo lista de pacotes... Pronto
Construindo árvore de dependências... Pronto
gcc já é a versão mais nova.
0 pacotes atualizados, 0 pacotes novos instalados, 0 a serem
removidos e 0
Alberto,
Mas é como eu mostrei, ao tentar instalar ele diz que o programa já está
instalado:
Lendo lista de pacotes... Pronto
Construindo árvore de dependências... Pronto
gcc já é a versão mais nova.
0 pacotes atualizados, 0 pacotes novos instalados, 0 a serem removidos e 0
não atualizados.
É
Bom dia amigos.
Eu estou tentando instalar um programa mas ao executar ./configure ele
mostra:
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot
create executables.
Procurei na internet esse
On 2007-02-23 08:30:52 +0100, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
gcc n'utilie pas de variable d'environnement pour ses options. RTFM
Mais noter qu'il en utilise certaines qui remplacent *certaines*
options: LIBRARY_PATH, CPATH, C_INCLUDE_PATH, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH,
OBJC_INCLUDE_PATH.
--
Vincent Lefèvre
Bonjour,
utilisant debian Sid avec gcc 4.1, je me rend compte que ce dernier ignore
totalement la variable CFLAGS de mon .zshrc. (J'ai essayé avec bash, pareil).
J'ai essayé sur le poste d'une autre personne avec le même système, mais qui
ne programme pas et avec une config de bash de base - même
Le Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 05:50:12AM +, Opera écrivait/wrote:
Bonjour,
utilisant debian Sid avec gcc 4.1, je me rend compte que ce dernier ignore
totalement la variable CFLAGS de mon .zshrc.
gcc n'utilie pas de variable d'environnement pour ses options. RTFM
CFLAGS est une variable de make
Package ID: installpackageid
Copyright (C) 1985-2005 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
FOR NON-COMMERCIAL USE ONLY
Command-line error: invalid GNU version number: 412
compilation aborted for test.c (code 4)
Here's a list of gcc/g++ packages installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l | grep -i
Hi Michael,
On Sunday 11 February 2007 20:45, michael wrote:
I can install Intel's icc compiler v9.0 on my unstable Debian system (ta
Daniel for make_deb) but when I try and compile I get the following
error. Any ideas on what I've done wrong?
That version of icc isn't compatible with gcc
Just when I thought I just about had a Debian system that
was complete enough to develop on without needing access
to my older distros
Does anyone know how to fix:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/audio$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
I have tried installing the gcc-4.1-doc package
$ man gcc
No manual entry for gcc
I have tried installing the gcc-4.1-doc package, but it didn't
seem to help. I know man pages for gcc do exist, as all my other
(non-Debian) systems seem to have them installed out of the box..
Try:
$ man gcc-4.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 07:18:07PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
Just when I thought I just about had a Debian system that
was complete enough to develop on without needing access
to my older distros
Does anyone know how to fix:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/audio$ man gcc
Hi,
When manually building applications in Debian (kernel, other packages) using
utilities (make-kpkg, others) is there any configuration file I can specify my
optimizations for, so that every time I do a build, I don't have to do things
like:
$ MAKEFLAGS=mtune=pentium-m make-kpkg .
Maybe
things like:
$ MAKEFLAGS=mtune=pentium-m make-kpkg .
Maybe something that I read about Gentoo of modifying the /etc/make.conf.
Do we have something similar ?
There might be a bit more elegant method. But can't you just use an alias for
a quick hack?
alias gcc=gcc -O2
alias gfortran
Hello.
Ritesh Raj Sarraf, 27.12.2006 20:00:
When manually building applications in Debian (kernel, other packages) using
utilities (make-kpkg, others) is there any configuration file I can specify my
optimizations for, […]
You can modify debian/rules in the source’s directory for this.
Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo escribió:
El jue, 16-11-2006 a las 12:24 -0400, Jhosue Rui escribió:
Federico Izuel escribió:
[...]
Trate usando apt-get, e instale gcc 3.4, pero cuando uso make se sigue
utilizando gcc 3.3, como tengo que hacer para compilar con gcc 3.4 a
través
de make
Federico Izuel escribió:
Tengo un problema y no se como solucionarlo... estoy tratando de instalar
los drivers de una placa de red inalambrica, y para ello necesito
compilarlos... pero como cuando compilo con make se utiliza gcc 3.3,
y el
kernel esta compilado con gcc 3.4, no puedo cargar el
El jue, 16-11-2006 a las 12:24 -0400, Jhosue Rui escribió:
Federico Izuel escribió:
[...]
Trate usando apt-get, e instale gcc 3.4, pero cuando uso make se sigue
utilizando gcc 3.3, como tengo que hacer para compilar con gcc 3.4 a
través
de make??
Tengo GNU/Linux Debian Sarge AMD64
Tengo un problema y no se como solucionarlo... estoy tratando de instalar los drivers de una placa de red inalambrica, y para ello necesito compilarlos... pero como cuando compilo con make se utiliza gcc 3.3, y el kernel esta compilado con gcc
3.4, no puedo cargar el modulo... por lo que necesito
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:02:32PM -0300, Federico Izuel wrote:
Trate usando apt-get, e instale gcc 3.4, pero cuando uso make se sigue
utilizando gcc 3.3, como tengo que hacer para compilar con gcc 3.4 a través
de make??
make CC=gcc-3.4
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E
Hi,
Am Freitag, 27. Oktober 2006 16:12 schrieb Eduard Bloch:
Toll, dass gcc-4.1 installiert ist. Aber gcc-4.0 ist es offensichtlich
nicht. Du kannst den gcc-4.0 einfach mal dazu installieren.
Nunja, eigentlich sollten die header bzw. linux-kbuild dann auch auf den
passenden
gcc dependen
Hi all
How can I find the gcc version that was used to compile the kernel? I am
running debian testing (etch) with
$uname -a
Linux kusumanchi 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
Why I need this:
I am trying to install madwifi drivers to get the wireless
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Kamaraju Kusumanchi told:
Hi all
How can I find the gcc version that was used to compile the kernel? I am
running debian testing (etch) with
$uname -a
Linux kusumanchi 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 2006 i686
GNU/Linux
$ cat
On Sunday 29 October 2006 02:01, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I believe the errors are due to incorrect gcc versions used to compile
the module and the kernel. I am using
Hmm, you have to be root to insmod the drivers.
Shouldn't one use modprobe with current versions of Linux?
Of course
On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:01, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 the mental interface of
Kamaraju Kusumanchi told:
Hi all
How can I find the gcc version that was used to compile the kernel? I
am running debian testing (etch) with
$uname -a
Linux kusumanchi 2.6.17
On Sunday 29 October 2006 02:09, Pollywog wrote:
On Sunday 29 October 2006 02:01, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
I believe the errors are due to incorrect gcc versions used to compile
the module and the kernel. I am using
Hmm, you have to be root to insmod the drivers.
Shouldn't one use
Hallo,
ich habe gerade aufm meinem Laptop (Ausus A6J) ein Debian Etch
installiert. Beim Kompilieren des Netzwerktreibers bekomme ich folgende
Fehlermeldungen:
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686/scripts/gcc-version.sh : line 11:
gcc-4.0 : command not found und make[2]: gcc-4.0: command
#include hallo.h
* Stephan Ferber [Fri, Oct 27 2006, 03:02:03PM]:
Hallo,
ich habe gerade aufm meinem Laptop (Ausus A6J) ein Debian Etch
installiert. Beim Kompilieren des Netzwerktreibers bekomme ich folgende
Fehlermeldungen:
/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.16-2-686/scripts/gcc-version.sh
Hey list,I'm using Debian sid. And I have gcc-4.1 installed on it. It seem I can not even start the aplication. Blow are my few tries.[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc filenamegcc: filename: No such file or directory
gcc: no input files[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc-4.1 goodgcc-4.1: good: No such file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/06 01:14, Rocky Ou wrote:
Hey list,
I'm using Debian sid. And I have gcc-4.1 installed on it. It seem I can not
even start the aplication. Blow are my few tries.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc filename
gcc: filename: No such file
Hey,
Thanks for your reply but it still not doing the work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc good.c
gcc: good.c: No such file or directory
gcc: no input files
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Can any of you help me please?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On 9/11/06, Rocky Ou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc good.c
gcc: good.c: No such file or directory
gcc: no input files
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Silly question but, is there a file called good.c in that directory?
--
Michael A. Marsh
http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~mmarsh
http
On 9/11/06, Rocky Ou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/06, Michael Marsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/11/06, Rocky Ou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc good.c
gcc: good.c: No such file or directory
gcc: no input files
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Silly question
On 9/11/06, James Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a development series,
but is it still
On 9/11/06, James Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a development series
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/06 13:49, James Stevenson wrote:
On 9/11/06, James Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
As far as I know Debian sarge still installs from the net install
cd with a 2.4.x kernel. It doesn't seem to have any problems that
I have
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:32:09PM +0800, Rocky Ou wrote:
Hey,
Thanks for your reply but it still not doing the work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc good.c
gcc: good.c: No such file or directory
gcc: no input files
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Can any of you help me please?
Hi Rocky,
just
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 9/11/06, James Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm still interesting in knowing why people still use GCC-2.95 and the
older kernels, 2.2 and 2.4. As for the kernels, it used to be that the
older ones were more stable since 2.6 was also a development
On 9/12/06, Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:32:09PM +0800, Rocky Ou wrote:
Hey,
Thanks for your reply but it still not doing the work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc good.c
gcc: good.c: No such file or directory
gcc: no input files
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Can any
401 - 500 of 2377 matches
Mail list logo
