Salut a tous,
j'aimerait pouvoir compiler un programme dans mon environnement de dev debian.
celui-ci possede une dependance vers plusieurs libs que je n'ai qu'au format 'nomdelalib.lib'
j'ai toujours ete habitue a compiler sous linux avec les 'nomdelalib.a'.
y a t il une solution pour compiler
Heyberger Ludovic a écrit :
Salut a tous,
j'aimerait pouvoir compiler un programme dans mon environnement de dev
debian.
celui-ci possede une dependance vers plusieurs libs que je n'ai qu'au
format 'nomdelalib.lib'
j'ai toujours ete habitue a compiler sous linux avec les 'nomdelalib.a'.
y
-image-2.6.8-20060330_custom.6.0s_i386.deb
Depois de 'meditar' um pouco, acho que esse i386 do final não vai sair
nunca, a nao ser que eu compile o kernel pra amd64, sparc ou powerpc :-)
Esse i386 na verdade significa 'Intel x86 / IA-32 (i386)', e nao tem nada
a ver com as opções do gcc q eu usei pra
Marcos,
Marcos Vinicius Lazarini escreveu:
Depois de 'meditar' um pouco, acho que esse i386 do final não vai sair
nunca, a nao ser que eu compile o kernel pra amd64, sparc ou powerpc :-)
Esse i386 na verdade significa 'Intel x86 / IA-32 (i386)', e nao tem
nada a ver com as opções do gcc q eu
a ver com as opções do gcc q eu usei pra compilar.
Na verdade, no repositório oficial, acho que nem existem pacotes i586,
i686 etc...
O computador que estou usando agora, está compilado com o
kernel-source-2.4.27 do repositório oficial.
Passei o --append_to_version=-686 e realmente gerou sem o
Marcos Lazarini escreveu:
Oi Luiz, muito boa a sua técnica - nao tinha pensando em fazer isso.
Parece q ele fez isso mesmo, dei uma fuçada por aqui e me pareceu q
ele compilou tudo conforme deveria ser (alias, ele faz uma série de
truques por debaixo do pano). De qualquer jeito, no
(make menuconfig), escolhi somente a arquitetura que
eu quero ter suporte, mas onde eu digo isso para o gcc?
Se nao me engano, precisa setar a opcao -march=athlon (ou a
-mcpu=athlon), mas nao achei nenhum lugar dizendo onde colocar isso no
make-kpkg.
No gentoo, ele segue as opções de um
somente a arquitetura
que eu quero ter suporte, mas onde eu digo isso para o gcc?
Se nao me engano, precisa setar a opcao -march=athlon (ou a
-mcpu=athlon), mas nao achei nenhum lugar dizendo onde colocar isso no
make-kpkg.
Fiz uma varredura no source que compilei da versão 2.6.8 e ajustando o
Hi all
I could reproduce the issue with :
- kernel 2.6.15 + GCC 4.0.2
modprobe snd_usb_audio would complain about unresolved symbols
RESOLUTION :
The bug seems indeed in GCC, and is fixed by GCC 4.0.3 :
- get GCC 4.0.3, recompile it
- recompile the kernel **with GCC 4.0.3** and the usb
Hi Andrew,
run the following:
update-alternatives --config cc
thank you very much. This has been a good help, that resolved also my
compiling process.
Regards,
MC
Marco Calviani wrote:
Hi Andrew,
run the following:
update-alternatives --config cc
thank you very much. This has been a good help, that resolved also my
compiling process.
Regards,
MC
But you didn't tell us what the problem was.
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi Hugo,
But you didn't tell us what the problem was.
it was related to this problem.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=303098
with cernlib libraries.
Regards,
MC
Hi list,
i'm asking if there is some way to change the default compiler and
related variables in a consistent way to another version. In
particular i would like to change it, due to some incompatibilies,
from 4.0 to 3.4. I've tried the brutal way changing the symlink of
gcc to gcc-4.0 to gcc
of
gcc to gcc-4.0 to gcc-3.4, but it was not so succesful.
Thanks in advance,
MC
It would be very interesting to see why you want to do this? What is the
incompatibility you are facing? May be there is a way to solve that
incompatibility without downgrading gcc.
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
tried the brutal way changing the symlink of
gcc to gcc-4.0 to gcc-3.4, but it was not so succesful.
run the following:
update-alternatives --config cc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
Glenn Meehan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It seems there is a bug with the kernel 2.6.8 that the new verison of
gcc (4.0.3) has picked up. So I am now unable to make menuconfig:
make menuconfig
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/mconf.o
scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:91: error: static declaration
Hi,
I downgraded gcc to stable.
gcc version 3.3.6
It works ok now.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
It seems there is a bug with the kernel 2.6.8 that the new verison of
gcc (4.0.3) has picked up. So I am now unable to make menuconfig:
make menuconfig
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/mconf.o
scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:91: error: static declaration of 'current_menu'
follows non-static declaration
Hi,
I've been supplied with a C++ binary that I'd like to be able to run on
my Sarge system. As I understand it was built on a recent Redhat
derivative with a GCC = 3.4. I also understand that this is not
compatible with Sarge and the application won't run (which it won't,
complains /usr/lib
Hallo Leute.
Ich würde gerne versuchen, ein selbst geschriebenes Programm auf
verschiedenen Versionen der GNU C/C++ Compiler zu übersetzen.
Jetzt benutzt debian ja das Alternatives-System, aber das greift beim
gcc und g++ nicht.
Gibt es da einen debian-way, um zwischen den einzelnen Versionen
On 17.01.06 20:56:29, Kai Hildebrandt wrote:
Gibt es da einen debian-way, um zwischen den einzelnen Versionen zu
wechseln (quasi mit einem Befehl)
AFAIK nein.
oder muss ich jeweils in /usr/bin die Symlinks von Hand einstellen?
Jupp.
Andreas
--
Your domestic life may be harmonious.
--
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 08:56:29PM +0100, Kai Hildebrandt wrote:
Hallo Leute.
Ich würde gerne versuchen, ein selbst geschriebenes Programm auf
verschiedenen Versionen der GNU C/C++ Compiler zu übersetzen.
Jetzt benutzt debian ja das Alternatives-System, aber das greift beim
gcc und g
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:56:29 +0100, Kai Hildebrandt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo Leute.
Ich würde gerne versuchen, ein selbst geschriebenes Programm auf
verschiedenen Versionen der GNU C/C++ Compiler zu übersetzen.
Jetzt benutzt debian ja das Alternatives-System, aber das greift beim
gcc
The modem drivers install on 2.6.8-2-686 using
gcc-3.3.5 but not on 2.6.15-1-686 recently installed.
I installed gcc-4 as indicated by the dpkg
output but the error stays the same. It also appears I
have no devfs and can't start it(see output below)
even though it's in lilo.conf to mount
I want to set up a new box with the possibility to run the latest
version of qcad. Unfortunately, this is only available built against
cpp3, 5 and 6. I think sid has version 4 IIRC. Can anybody tell me if
it is possible to install sarge with version 3 (or 5 or 6)?
TIA
--
richard
--
To
On 2005-12-09 18:55:37 +0100, Nicolas Roudninski wrote:
Jody a écrit :
Ou méthode goret:
ln -sfn /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 /usr/bin/gcc
Je dois être un goret : ln -sfn /usr/bin/gcc-3.3 /usr/bin/gcc ;-)
Oui, vraiment un goret. Tu risques de casser les upgrades ou les
compilations système (e.g. avec
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:40:50 -0500
Marty Landman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UNCLELEO:~# memtest86
bash: memtest86: command not found
UNCLELEO:~# find / -name memtest86
UNCLELEO:~#
It's probably not included on the mini-iso. If you have a repository
setup, you could easily just aptitude install
I've started getting lots of unresolved dependencies relating to
gcc-4.0-base being a different version to that expected (see below).
This is on an unstable kernel:
$ uname -a
Linux manchester-campaigns 2.6.11-1-k7 #1 Mon Jun 20 21:26:23 MDT 2005
i686 GNU/Linux
I can't see anything in the BTS
at this
point.
gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
make: *** [rpc_parse/parse_rpc.po] Error 1
Is the error repeatable - same source file, same error? Either that, or
does it happen with other compiles? Either way, you could be
experiencing memory issues or other hardware
At 03:08 PM 12/10/2005, David E. Fox wrote:
Is the error repeatable - same source file, same error?
Yes, I tried a few times.
does it happen with other compiles?
Don't know yet, wanted to do Samba first.
I'd first try memtest86 - run it through and see if there are any memory
errors
On Saturday 10 December 2005 16:40, Marty Landman wrote:
UNCLELEO:~# memtest86
bash: memtest86: command not found
UNCLELEO:~# find / -name memtest86
UNCLELEO:~#
Did above as root. Or could this indicate a hosed install?
You download from the web and burn the memtest86 iso image to CD then
Bonjour,
Je suis actuellement sous debian etch qui utilise gcc-4.0.
Je voudrais compiler mythtv mais cela ne marche pas à cause de la
version de gcc. J'ai fait des apt-get install de gcc-3.3 mais je ne
sais comment dire à gcc d'utiliser 3.3 et non 4.0.
Lorsque je lance gcc -v il me met version
Bonjour,
Je suis actuellement sous debian etch qui utilise gcc-4.0.
Je voudrais compiler mythtv mais cela ne marche pas à cause de la
version de gcc. J'ai fait des apt-get install de gcc-3.3 mais je ne
sais comment dire à gcc d'utiliser 3.3 et non 4.0.
Lorsque je lance gcc -v il me met
Il faut linker /usr/bin/gcc vers gcc-3.3 ainsi que tous les binaires
nécessaires à la compilation d'un binaire vers les versions
correspondantes (/usr/bin/ld, etc .. )
Antoine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
Je suis actuellement sous debian etch qui utilise gcc-4.0.
Je voudrais compiler
Jody a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je suis actuellement sous debian etch qui utilise gcc-4.0.
Je voudrais compiler mythtv mais cela ne marche pas à cause de la
version de gcc. J'ai fait des apt-get install de gcc-3.3 mais je ne
sais comment dire à gcc d'utiliser 3.3 et non 4.0.
Lorsque je lance gcc
I've recently installed Woody on an old PC - 166Mhz w/ 2.5 GB hd. Am trying
to get Samba installed from the source; after doing ./configure, apparently
ending ok my make stops with an internal gcc error.
Compiling rpc_parse/parse_net.c with -fPIC
Compiling rpc_parse/parse_reg.c with -fPIC
On Thursday 10 November 2005 07:49 pm, Jules Dubois wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2005 19:40, Mike Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Since my testing system updated to gcc-4, I can no longer build a kernel
(the
debian way). Doing make oldconfig or make xconfig gives
Folks, hello and thanks for the help you've generously offered thus far.
Since my testing system updated to gcc-4, I can no longer build a kernel (the
debian way). Doing make oldconfig or make xconfig gives errors almost
immediately and won't build.
Another problem when it becomes necessary
I'm also using gcc4 and can't build the hpt374 driver.
Oldconfig is working. How about menuconfig?
Mike Chandler schreef:
Folks, hello and thanks for the help you've generously offered thus far.
Since my testing system updated to gcc-4, I can no longer build a kernel (the
debian way). Doing
On Thursday 10 November 2005 19:40, Mike Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Since my testing system updated to gcc-4, I can no longer build a kernel
(the
debian way). Doing make oldconfig or make xconfig gives errors almost
immediately and won't build.
What version of gcc
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 03:45:02PM +0800, ?? wrote:
hi now there are gcc-3.3-base gcc-3.4-base gcc-4.0-base if i am unintsll
anyone of them it will uninstall 100 packages at the fewest how can i do
that
You don't. You have no reason to.
--
Marc Wilson | HUGH BEAUMONT died in 1982
hi
now there are gcc-3.3-base
gcc-3.4-base
gcc-4.0-base
if i am unintsll anyone of them
it will uninstall 100 packages at the fewest
how can i do that
give best advise
thank you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
There are *at least* 2 areas that always get my admiration: the kernel
(now running 2.6.14-rc1 doing great!) and c++. How anybody can get a
compiler off the ground and make sense out of my scratchings and have it
all come out as code is beyond me.
But Sarge now has a c++ compiler that
Subject: Re: how to use -lreadline option in gcc
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:34:03 -0400
On 10/20/05, weiyun lv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I download some source code which use -lreadline -ltermcap and which has
the
line
#include readline/readline.h
my compile tells me that it can not find
On 10/27/05, weiyun lv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks and yes, I find it: libreadline5-dev.
But my system is 2.4.27-adeos , when I run 'apt-get install
libreadline5-dev', it says that It can not find image 2.6.10. How can I
install it onto my rtai-2.4.27 system?
Have you tried
still the same error, like this:
Removing libreadline5-dev ...
Selecting previously deselected package libreadline4-dev.
(Reading database ... 95569 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libreadline4-dev (from .../libreadline4-dev_4.3-11_i386.deb) ...
Setting up
On 10/27/05, weiyun lv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
still the same error, like this:
[...]
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.10 (10.00.Custom) ...
Internal Error: Could not find image (/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10)
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.6.10 (--configure):
That would seem to be a different
still the same error, like this:
[...]
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.10 (10.00.Custom) ...
Internal Error: Could not find image (/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10)
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.6.10 (--configure):
That would seem to be a different problem than that you can't install
On 10/27/05, weiyun lv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ever tried to install a 2.6.10 kernel, but it did not work well, so I have
delete all files relative to it.
Do I have this right?
- You installed a 2.6.10 kernel with apt-get.
- It didn't work.
- You removed it by deleting files rather than with
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24.10.05 23:18:47, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Andreas Pakulat:
On 24.10.05 22:16:52, Hartmut Figge wrote:
[...]
Siehe oben. Habe ich alle fraglichen Libs erwischt?
s.o. Nein.
Nun ja, ich könnte ja einfach mal alle angeben. O:-)
[EMAIL
Markus Schulz:
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 18:03 schrieb Hartmut Figge:
Beinahe täglich baue ich mir meinen seamonkey unter sid. Bis vor
einigen Wochen mit gcc-3.3, weil sich einige andere für meine builds
interessierten, aber mit den unter gcc-4 gebauten nichts anfangen
konnten.
warum das
On 25.10.05 09:12:59, Sven Hartge wrote:
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24.10.05 23:18:47, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Andreas Pakulat:
On 24.10.05 22:16:52, Hartmut Figge wrote:
[...]
Siehe oben. Habe ich alle fraglichen Libs erwischt?
s.o. Nein.
Nun ja, ich könnte
dann ld in Frage, welches aus dem Paket
binutils stammt. Also Downgrade auf 2.16.1-3.
Und siehe da, jetzt bin ich mit mit einem gcc3-seamonkey unterwegs. :)
Da es mir persönlich egal ist, mit welchem Compiler mein Affe gebaut
ist, werde ich jetzt als Default wieder den gcc-3.3 nehmen.
Der Upload
On 2005-10-25 14:07:19 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 25.10.05 09:12:59, Sven Hartge wrote:
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24.10.05 23:18:47, Hartmut Figge wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd seam/0509130010-gcc3/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin
linux-gate.so.1 =
On 25.10.05 15:42:11, Michael Bienia wrote:
On 2005-10-25 14:07:19 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
On 25.10.05 09:12:59, Sven Hartge wrote:
Andreas Pakulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24.10.05 23:18:47, Hartmut Figge wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd
gcc-3.3, weil sich einige andere für meine builds
interessierten, aber mit den unter gcc-4 gebauten nichts anfangen konnten.
Nun, nach einem meiner Updates bei sid endeten die Compilationen unter
gcc-3.3 etwa nach der Hälfte mit einem Fehler. Das kann jetzt an sid
liegen oder an einer Änderung im
On 24.10.05 18:03:46, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Nun, nach einem meiner Updates bei sid endeten die Compilationen unter
gcc-3.3 etwa nach der Hälfte mit einem Fehler. Das kann jetzt an sid
liegen oder an einer Änderung im Source von seamonkey.
Bisher wollte ich das Problem aussitzen, in der
:
Dennoch danke für Dein Interesse. :)
Hast du die benoetigten C++ Libs auch mit gcc-3.3 gebaut?
Hm? Das Bauen wird im wesentlichen durch
make -f client.mk build || exit
erledigt.
Also insbesondere mozilla selbst?
Vor dem Bauen wird $OBJDIR gelöscht, so dass alles neu gebaut wird.
gcc-3.3 und 3.4
On 24.10.05 19:07:16, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Also: Alle C++-Libs die seamonkey benoetigt selbst bauen mit gcc-3.3 und
in einem chroot installieren
Ähm, es klappt alles, wenn ich den gcc-3.4 oder den gcc-4.0 nehme. Falls
seamonkey noch libs aus sid braucht, so passen diese.
Fuer gcc-3.4 und
Andreas Pakulat:
On 24.10.05 19:07:16, Hartmut Figge wrote:
[...]
Und da der gcc-3.3 unter sid immer noch angeboten wird, sollte das
eigentlich auch für diese Libs gelten.
Da liegt dein Irrtum. Die C++-Libs in Sid sind mittlerweile fast alle
mit gcc-4.0 gebaut (der ist jetzt der Default
On 24.10.05 20:21:12, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Andreas Pakulat:
Da liegt dein Irrtum. Die C++-Libs in Sid sind mittlerweile fast alle
mit gcc-4.0 gebaut (der ist jetzt der Default-Compiler) und demzufolge
inkompatibel zu Programmen/Libs die mit gcc-3.3 gebaut wurden. Das
Problem ist (falls dir
sinnvollerweise ein sarge in einem chroot nutzen. Ähnlich, wie ich es
früher bei Backports für woody gemacht habe.
Entweder das, oder ein sid-chroot in dem du alle C++-Dependecies von
seamonkey mit gcc-3.3 neu baust.
Zuviel Aufwand, nur, damit einige wenige andere meine Affen benutzen können
._ZN13nsXPTCVariant4InitERK17nsXPTCMiniVariantRK9nsXPTTypeh' of
../../dist/lib/libgkcontentxtf_s.a(nsXTFWeakTearoff.o)
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Tja, dafuer kenne ich mich nicht genug aus mit dem Linker.. Hast du nen
sauberen Source? Vllt. ist da noch irgendwo ne Datei von nem gcc-4 Build
ueberig
Andreas Pakulat:
On 24.10.05 22:16:52, Hartmut Figge wrote:
[...]
Siehe oben. Habe ich alle fraglichen Libs erwischt?
s.o. Nein.
Nun ja, ich könnte ja einfach mal alle angeben. O:-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldd seam/0509130010-gcc3/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
kompiliert
einwandfrei mit gcc-3.3 aber nicht mit gcc-3.4/4.0. Aber auch da gehoert
ein Bugreport geschrieben.
Andreas
--
You will be awarded a medal for disregarding safety in saving someone.
--
Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum
Am Montag, 24. Oktober 2005 18:03 schrieb Hartmut Figge:
Gruß,
[...]
Beinahe täglich baue ich mir meinen seamonkey unter sid. Bis vor
einigen Wochen mit gcc-3.3, weil sich einige andere für meine builds
interessierten, aber mit den unter gcc-4 gebauten nichts anfangen
konnten.
warum das
version que quiero usar de gcc y la version de gcc que el kernel intenta
usar son distintas :S... Os pongo el mensaje concreto
Trying to find a suitable vmmon module for your running kernel.
None of the pre-built vmmon modules for VMware Workstation is suitable
for your
running kernel. Do you
Buenas, lo que pasa es que mi debian venia con las gcc 3.3 y cuando
instalaba el vmware con el kernel 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 me decia que mi
kernel habia sido compilado con la version gcc 3.4 y que estaba
intentando usar la version 3.3. Asi que actualize gcc a las 3.4 y le
cambie el CC (export CC=/usr
Q tal:
El Lunes, 24 de Octubre de 2005 11:23, Alfredo Casado escribió:
Buenas, lo que pasa es que mi debian venia con las gcc 3.3 y cuando
instalaba el vmware con el kernel 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 me decia que mi
kernel habia sido compilado con la version gcc 3.4 y que estaba
intentando usar la
Sip, lo hice con el synaptic pero si:
debian:~# apt-get install gcc-3.4
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
gcc-3.4 ya está en su versión más reciente.
0 actualizados, 0 se instalarán, 0 para eliminar y 0 no actualizados.
debian:~#
Se supone que ya estan
Q tal:
El Lunes, 24 de Octubre de 2005 12:14, Alfredo Casado escribió:
Sip, lo hice con el synaptic pero si:
debian:~# apt-get install gcc-3.4
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias... Hecho
gcc-3.4 ya está en su versión más reciente.
0 actualizados, 0 se
Uf lo que hace el no saber :$ El caso es que mi kernel esta
compilado con gcc-3.3? Porque cuando le meto las gcc-3.3 el vmware me
dice esto?
Your kernel was built with gcc version 3.4.4, while you are trying
to use
/usr/bin/gcc version 3.3.5. This configuration is not recommended
and VMware
Hola, avance algo con el vmware 5.5 pero aun tengo problemillas... os
cuento:
Tengo el kernel 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 y necesito instalar el vmware 5.5. El
problema es que cuando ejecuto ./vmware-config.pl me dice que la
version que quiero usar de gcc y la version de gcc que el kernel intenta
usar son
biosedit wrote:
how can to install ati driver with gcc-4.0.2
i am uses ati9600(RV350) and install driver 8.14.13
with gcc3.4.3 kernel 2.6.8 the driver is work well
but now i am update gcc to 4.0.2 kernel to 2.6.13 the driver is not work
and can't install the driver
assuming new VMA API
I download some source code which use -lreadline -ltermcap and which has the
line
#include readline/readline.h
my compile tells me that it can not find this file, accordingly it doesn't
know function readline().
what package should i install to solve this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 10/20/05, weiyun lv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I download some source code which use -lreadline -ltermcap and which has the
line
#include readline/readline.h
my compile tells me that it can not find this file, accordingly it doesn't
know function readline().
what package should i install
[20/10/2005 -- 16:34u] Michael Marsh:
I download some source code which use -lreadline -ltermcap and which
has the line #include readline/readline.h
...
what package should i install to solve this?
libreadline5-dev should do it. There's also a libreadline4-dev , and
I have no idea
how can to install ati driver with gcc-4.0.2
i am uses ati9600(RV350) and install driver 8.14.13
with gcc3.4.3 kernel 2.6.8 the driver is work well
but now i am update gcc to 4.0.2 kernel to 2.6.13 the driver is not work
and can't install the driver
assuming new VMA API since we do have kernel
Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 10:25 +, caio ferreira escreveu:
All
Aparentemente a versão 2.4.31 do kernel do linux não pode ser compilado
com a
versão 4.0 do gcc, estou utilizando a versão testing do debian. Para resolver
esse problema instalei a versão 3.3 do gcc e fiz o
Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 10:20 -0300, Fernando Ike de Oliveira escreveu:
pode usar o update-alternatives ou instalar o galternatives
para fazer essa alteração.
Não nesse caso. O gcc não está no sistema de alternatives por algum
motivo que eu não tive saco pra pesquisar qual é:
$ ls -l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kohzak a écrit :
Bling ma repondu ceci (merci a lui)
Salut
Dans /usr/bin, il faut faire pointer le lien de gcc vers gcc-3.x et non pas
vers gcc-4.0.
++
Ca fonctionne nikel
koh
Christophe_yoda_testeur a écrit :
kohzak a écrit
All
Aparentemente a versão 2.4.31 do kernel do linux não pode ser compilado com a
versão 4.0 do gcc, estou utilizando a versão testing do debian. Para resolver
esse problema instalei a versão 3.3 do gcc e fiz o seguinte:
# mv gcc gcc.backup
# mv gccbug gccbug.backup
# ln -s gcc-3.3
Em Sex, 2005-10-14 às 10:25 +, caio ferreira escreveu:
All
Aparentemente a versão 2.4.31 do kernel do linux não pode ser compilado
com a
versão 4.0 do gcc, estou utilizando a versão testing do debian. Para resolver
esse problema instalei a versão 3.3 do gcc e fiz o
Bonjour.
J'ai gcc 4.0 et 3.3 d'installer sur ma machine (ibook 12 sur testing)
J essaye de compiler mol (mac on linux) pour utiliser ma carte wireless
sous linux.
(http://bb.zhang.free.fr/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=debian:experimenter_airport_extreme_sous_linux_via_mol)
Apres la compilation, en
kohzak a écrit :
Bonjour.
J'ai gcc 4.0 et 3.3 d'installer sur ma machine (ibook 12 sur testing)
J essaye de compiler mol (mac on linux) pour utiliser ma carte wireless
sous linux.
(http://bb.zhang.free.fr/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=debian:experimenter_airport_extreme_sous_linux_via_mol)
Apres
Bling ma repondu ceci (merci a lui)
Salut
Dans /usr/bin, il faut faire pointer le lien de gcc vers gcc-3.x et non pas
vers gcc-4.0.
++
Ca fonctionne nikel
koh
Christophe_yoda_testeur a écrit :
kohzak a écrit :
Bonjour.
J'ai gcc 4.0 et 3.3 d'installer sur ma machine (ibook 12 sur
Hi,
anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
What can i do to resolve it ?
Thanks in advance
mess-mate
--
You'll be called to a post requiring ability in handling groups
Wh are you compiling gcc.
Why not simply load the debian (.deb) package for gcc?
IFor that matter, I thinkg gcc is part of a standard SARGE install.
Am I missing something here??
At 03:55 PM 10/3/2005 +0200, mess-mate wrote:
Hi,
anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled
Craig M. Houck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Wh are you compiling gcc.
| Why not simply load the debian (.deb) package for gcc?
| IFor that matter, I thinkg gcc is part of a standard SARGE install.
| Am I missing something here??
|
|
| At 03:55 PM 10/3/2005 +0200, mess-mate wrote:
| Hi,
| anyone
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:55:31PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
Hi,
anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
What can i do to resolve it ?
Thanks in advance
Which sources are you using? Install
Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:55:31PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
| Hi,
| anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
| i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
| What can i do to resolve it ?
| Thanks
Jon Dowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 03:55:31PM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
| Hi,
| anyone compiled gcc without the 'pch' errors ?? (precompiled headers)
| i'm on sarge and a make check fails for all 'FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/...'
| What can i do to resolve it ?
| Thanks
mess-mate wrote:
I forgot why isn't there a 3.4.3 gcc on debian. Any special
reason ?
Yeah, because there's a GCC 4.0.2 now. Also, Debian tends to stick with
proven compilers and 3.4 was probably too new for sarge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
leider ist Googel ausnahmsweise nicht so gesprächig gewesen, wie ich es
gern hätte...
Ich will hier noch ein zusätzliches Modul für meinen Kernel bauen, da
der Kernel selber aber mit gcc-3.3 gebaut ist und inzwischen der gcc-4
mein System erobert hat frage ich mich, wie ich einfach
Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2005 21:51 schrieb Christian Frommeyer:
Hi,
leider ist Googel ausnahmsweise nicht so gesprächig gewesen, wie ich
es gern hätte...
Ich will hier noch ein zusätzliches Modul für meinen Kernel bauen, da
der Kernel selber aber mit gcc-3.3 gebaut ist und inzwischen der
Am Mittwoch 28 September 2005 22:13 schrieb Markus Schulz:
falls du mit make-kpkg baust:
MAKEFLAGS=CC=gcc-3.3 make-kpkg
Vielen Dank, das tat.
Gruß Chris
--
A: because it distrupts the normal process of thought
Q: why is top posting frowned upon
Could a developer subscribed to the list explain the following
anomaly to me? I had always assumed that amd64 was a separate
architecture. With the amd64 libs installed, the gcc-4.0 source
package fails to build on my machine.
alpha:~# uname -m
i686
alpha:~# apt-get build-dep gcc-4.0
Reading
Prueba con set cc=rutadondetieneselgcc/gcc-version.
saludos,
Fleky
El 19/09/05, manolo[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Buenas... tras unos problemillas ayer con el sonido (buscando en el
archivo de la lista encontre la solucion y con un alsaconf), ya tengo
mi debian sid andando al 90% :-)
Ahora
Hi and sorry for the delay
I'm not using a frontend. I'v tryed xcdroast once, but I'm not using it.
Thanks for all the replies. I'll try this.
Erdi Balint wrote:
Hi,
Yes, I went throught the same thing just some days ago and with the
dev=/dev/hdc (or wherever your CD writer is) setting it
sh
NVIDIA-Linux...
Pero esta vez me pide el paquete gcc, exactamente:
ERROR: Unable to find the development tool `cc` in your path; please
make sure
that you have the package 'gcc' installed. If gcc is installed
on your
system, then please check that `cc` is in your PATH
601 - 700 of 2377 matches
Mail list logo
