Re: GPG problems

2022-12-04 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 04:28:00PM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote: > * 2022-12-04 12:05:56+, Alain D. D. Williams wrote: > > > Part of the problem is the hopeless message "Server indicated a > > failure" which says little. Any idea how I could get something more > > informative ? > > You can

Re: GPG problems

2022-12-04 Thread Teemu Likonen
* 2022-12-04 12:05:56+, Alain D. D. Williams wrote: > Part of the problem is the hopeless message "Server indicated a > failure" which says little. Any idea how I could get something more > informative ? You can change debug logging level. Edit ~/.gnupg/dirmngr.conf file and write something

Re: GPG problems

2022-12-04 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 02:59:41PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > keys.openpgp.org should be operational. It responds to ping. > > Also have a look at > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2021-June/065261.html . No, that is not the issue. It works on Debian 11 but not Debian 10, both

Re: GPG problems

2022-12-03 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 12:42 PM Alain D D Williams wrote: > > I am running Debian 10 (buster). I generated a new key that I wanted to > upload, > but it fails: > > $ gpg --send-keys 0xBA366B977C06BAF7 > gpg: sending key 0xBA366B977C06BAF7 to hkps://keys.openpgp.org > gpg: keyserver send failed:

GPG problems

2022-12-03 Thread Alain D D Williams
I am running Debian 10 (buster). I generated a new key that I wanted to upload, but it fails: $ gpg --send-keys 0xBA366B977C06BAF7 gpg: sending key 0xBA366B977C06BAF7 to hkps://keys.openpgp.org gpg: keyserver send failed: Server indicated a failure gpg: keyserver send failed: Server indicated a

Re: Etch-backports and gpg problems (SOLVED)

2007-10-02 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:37:12AM -0500, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- What about: sudo (command_1 | command_2) Won't work -- the ()s are shell metacharacters, and sudo knows nothing about them. What you would need to do this with just

Re: Etch-backports and gpg problems (SOLVED)

2007-09-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/24/07 21:44, Marc Shapiro wrote: Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: David Fox wrote: It might be worth mentioning that sudo doesn't work across pipes: For instance: sudo command_1 | command_2 The first command will be run as root, but the

Re: Etch-backports and gpg problems (SOLVED)

2007-09-24 Thread Marc Shapiro
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: David Fox wrote: It might be worth mentioning that sudo doesn't work across pipes: For instance: sudo command_1 | command_2 The first command will be run as root, but the second will be run with normal user permissions. You can probably get around that by

Etch-backports and gpg problems

2007-09-23 Thread Marc Shapiro
I am running Etch and I want to install the alpine package from etch-backports. I also want to verify the downloaded files. I followed the instructions on the backports instruction page: If you are using *etch* and you want apt to verify the

Re: Etch-backports and gpg problems (SOLVED)

2007-09-23 Thread Marc Shapiro
Marc Shapiro wrote: I followed the instructions on the backports instruction page: If you are using *etch* and you want apt to verify the downloaded backports you can import backports.org archive’s key into apt: gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net

Re: Etch-backports and gpg problems (SOLVED)

2007-09-23 Thread David Fox
On 9/23/07, Marc Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I had run as root, it probably would have worked, but I used sudo. This only runs the first command as root (I believe), so the command 'apt-key add - ' was run as a normal user and did not like that. Using It might be worth mentioning

Re: Etch-backports and gpg problems (SOLVED)

2007-09-23 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
David Fox wrote: It might be worth mentioning that sudo doesn't work across pipes: For instance: sudo command_1 | command_2 The first command will be run as root, but the second will be run with normal user permissions. You can probably get around that by enclosing the entire

Re: gpg problems

2003-08-28 Thread Vikki Roemer
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:31:47PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:32:05PM -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote: Hi, I have a gpg key, and under my old install I could get gpg to work with mutt. Now mutt and gpg won't work together. Apparently gpg can't find my key, or

Re: gpg problems

2003-08-20 Thread Karl E. Jorgensen
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 04:32:05PM -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote: Hi, I have a gpg key, and under my old install I could get gpg to work with mutt. Now mutt and gpg won't work together. Apparently gpg can't find my key, or something like that. The errors I get every time I try to send a signed

gpg problems

2003-08-14 Thread Vikki Roemer
Hi, I have a gpg key, and under my old install I could get gpg to work with mutt. Now mutt and gpg won't work together. Apparently gpg can't find my key, or something like that. The errors I get every time I try to send a signed email are: gpg: [don't know]: invalid packet (ctb=00) gpg: