Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-05 Thread Wei Chen
On 2/5/08, Mihira Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 10:41, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Note that the G.F.W system of the government is in fact mainly based GFW? Great FireWall ? [OT] Nod. And it usually

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Dan H.
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to boot I can't even use

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:54:00AM +0100, Dan H. wrote: I like Claws (called sylpheed-claws in Debian). Recently renamed claws. BTW: of all the X-based clients, this (sylpheed and claws) is the only one I managed to figure out how to run imap through a custom pipe command (like pine and

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 02:54, Dan H. wrote: [snip] I like Claws (called sylpheed-claws in Debian). Not to be confused with the more basic and less GTKish sylpheed. Of the X MUAs I've tried (Opera, Sylpheed has been GTK2 for quite some time now.

Re: urxvt [was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?]

2008-02-04 Thread Александър Л . Димитров
Quoth Andrew Sackville-West: On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:31:29PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/03/08 11:08, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 05:08, Dan H. wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:42:48AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Move all your email into an IMAP store. Then you can use whatever MUA you want, whenever you want, and not have to worry about MUA storage

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-04 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sun February 3 2008, Ron Johnson wrote: I don't view them in their own window. You do that by hitting ENTER when in preview mode, correct? In its own window, it loses the GO menu selection that has the go to next... is that a bug or a feature? Design decision or oversight, it doesn't

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-04 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 06:57, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sun February 3 2008, Ron Johnson wrote: I don't view them in their own window. You do that by hitting ENTER when in preview mode, correct? In its own window, it loses the GO menu selection that has the

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 09:37, Wei Chen wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/04/08 07:07, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Web mail can also be a feasible solution. I use gmail to retrieve and aggregate emails from all my other mail boxes. In this way I can read mails

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 07:07, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Web mail can also be a feasible solution. I use gmail to retrieve and aggregate emails from all my other mail boxes. In this way I can read mails from any places where an internet connection is

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Wei Chen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/04/08 05:08, Dan H. wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:42:48AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Move all your email into an IMAP store. Then you can use whatever MUA you want, whenever you want, and not have to worry about MUA

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 10:41, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Note that the G.F.W system of the government is in fact mainly based GFW? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA PETA - People Eating Tasty Animals -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Wei Chen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/04/08 07:07, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Web mail can also be a feasible solution. I use gmail to retrieve and aggregate emails from all my other mail boxes. In this way I can read mails from any places where an internet

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Dan H.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:42:48AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Move all your email into an IMAP store. Then you can use whatever MUA you want, whenever you want, and not have to worry about MUA storage incompatibility. You mean, locally? --D. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread José Santos
On 02/04/08 07:07, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Web mail can also be a feasible solution. I use gmail to retrieve and aggregate emails from all my other mail boxes. In this way I can read mails from any places where an internet connection is available. Other merits over local IMAP

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Jochen Schulz
Dan H.: On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 03:42:48AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: Move all your email into an IMAP store. Then you can use whatever MUA you want, whenever you want, and not have to worry about MUA storage incompatibility. You mean, locally? I guess he does. I am running an IMAP

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Wei Chen
On Feb 4, 2008 11:58 PM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 09:37, Wei Chen wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/04/08 07:07, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Call me tin-foil boy, but I'd rather not have all my sometimes- sensitive

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Charlie
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ron Johnson shared this with us all: --} Yes. What you said may be correct, but I'd rather not have my sensitive --} --} Now that I think about it, though, was it Yahoo or Google that --} turned over emails from dissenters to the PRC? --} --} information written in an email.

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-04 Thread Mihira Fernando
Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/04/08 10:41, Wei Chen wrote: [snip] Note that the G.F.W system of the government is in fact mainly based GFW? Great FireWall ? Mihira. -- Not many people know when love really starts... More than a friend, but not

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 09:05, Michael Pobega wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to

GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Michael Pobega
I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to boot I can't even use GViM as my editor!). Can anyone suggest a good GTK+ e-mail

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Dotan Cohen
On 03/02/2008, Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to boot I can't even use GViM as

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Dotan Cohen
On 03/02/2008, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone suggest a good GTK+ e-mail reader/writer? I have cron getting my e-mail so the client doesn't even need to have POP/IMAP. I recently switched from Kmail to Thunderbird, and I would recommend either of them. I forgot to

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Andreas Rönnquist
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:05:43 -0500 Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to boot I can't

Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 09:38, Dotan Cohen wrote: On 03/02/2008, Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Dotan Cohen
On 03/02/2008, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last month I tried KMail/KDE for a couple of weeks, because of how the GNOME people have their heads stuck up MSFT's ass. You haven't seen KDE4 (vista clone) yet. Sad, sad times we are in. But couldn't stand it. The keyboard shortcuts

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Dotan Cohen
On 03/02/2008, Andreas Rönnquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 10:05:43 -0500 Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 10:24, Dotan Cohen wrote: On 03/02/2008, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last month I tried KMail/KDE for a couple of weeks, because of how the GNOME people have their heads stuck up MSFT's ass. You haven't seen KDE4 (vista

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 10:26, Dotan Cohen wrote: [snip] Or Penelope, the Endura-on-Thunderbird implementation. Penelope doesn't appear to be packaged yet. And it's Eudora, not Endura. - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA PETA - People Eating Tasty

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Александър Л . Димитров
Quoth Michael Pobega: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to boot I can't even use GViM as my editor!). I'd suggest you just

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Damon L. Chesser
Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 09:38, Dotan Cohen wrote: On 03/02/2008, Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sun February 3 2008, Ron Johnson wrote: But KMail made me close the email window in order to press n to get to the next unread email.  Maybe most KMail users/developers just like 3-pane operation. n is next message, + is next unread message. I use + to scroll through all the unread

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 11:55, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sun February 3 2008, Ron Johnson wrote: But KMail made me close the email window in order to press n to get to the next unread email. Maybe most KMail users/developers just like 3-pane operation. n

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Damon L. Chesser
Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 10:24, Dotan Cohen wrote: On 03/02/2008, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last month I tried KMail/KDE for a couple of weeks, because of how the GNOME people have their heads stuck up MSFT's ass.

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 11:42, Damon L. Chesser wrote: And that n button to go to the next unread email is why I hate evolution AND outlook. I have yet to find a simple way to read the next UNREAD email in either. I use Thunderbird when ever possible. Used

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 11:40, Damon L. Chesser wrote: [snip] the GNOME people have their heads stuck up MSFT's ass. Say what? What did I miss? What do you mean Ron? BTW try XFCE4. I like it. XFCE4 just doesn't have the integrated feel that GNOME does.

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Sun February 3 2008, Ron Johnson wrote: n is next message, + is next unread message. I use + to scroll through all the unread messages in all of my folders. I never got that to work when the email message was in it's own window. I don't view them in their own window. You do that by

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to boot I can't even use

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread lostson
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 12:08:06 -0500 Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread s. keeling
Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere near as good as Mutt, with threading/speed/customizability (And to boot I can't even use GViM as my editor!).

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Александър Л . Димитров
Quoth s. keeling: Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can anyone suggest a good GTK+ e-mail reader/writer? I have cron getting my e-mail so the client doesn't even need to have POP/IMAP. Install gkrellm, tell its Mail builtin to call mutt in an xterm (or whatever). mutt will continue

urxvt [was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?]

2008-02-03 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:31:29PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 02/03/08 11:08, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But

Re: Tbird kb shortcuts (was Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?)

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 14:05, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sun February 3 2008, Ron Johnson wrote: n is next message, + is next unread message. I use + to scroll through all the unread messages in all of my folders. I never got that to work when the email

Re: GTK+ E-mail App on par with Mutt?

2008-02-03 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/08 11:08, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote: I'm finally taking the plunge from full CLI to using an X server, and in place of Mutt I've been using Evolution; But Evolution is nowhere