The message has been attached.
Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt
Description: plain/text
g them from their original encoding)
> - allow to use vi as the editor of choice
> - able to recode the outgoing posts from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-2
Not to start a debate or anything, but if you're willing to settle for
emacs vi-mode, gnus might be what you're looking for.
> If not, is
Hello.
Eduard Bloch:
> #include
:o)
> * Shot [Mon, Mar 29 2004, 02:13:34PM]:
>
> > I'm looking for a good Usenet newsreader that would satisfy the
> > following requirements (i.e. work the way Mutt does for email):
> >
> > - console-based
> > - able to display the incoming posts in UTF-8
> >
#include
* Shot [Mon, Mar 29 2004, 02:13:34PM]:
> I'm looking for a good Usenet newsreader that would satisfy the
> following requirements (i.e. work the way Mutt does for email):
>
> - console-based
> - able to display the incoming posts in UTF-8
> (recoding them from their original encoding)
Hello.
Katipo:
> Shot wrote:
>
> >If not, is there a *reliable* Usenet-to-email
> >gateway that would carry the pl.* newsgroups?
> http://gmane.org/
Isn't Gmane mail-to-Usenet gateway, i.e. "there is
a mailing list and I want to read it in my newsreader&quo
hoice
- able to recode the outgoing posts from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-2
If not, is there a *reliable* Usenet-to-email
gateway that would carry the pl.* newsgroups?
www.newsgate.pl drops a lot of headers (often the encoding ones,
which makes some posts unreadable) and breaks threading when
I reply via
le to recode the outgoing posts from UTF-8 to ISO-8859-2
If not, is there a *reliable* Usenet-to-email
gateway that would carry the pl.* newsgroups?
www.newsgate.pl drops a lot of headers (often the encoding ones,
which makes some posts unreadable) and breaks threading when
I reply via email (
connected
on the COM port. Using AT commands, it sends an SDS message.
It's a standalone setup (no mobile company needed, no gateway needed).
For SMS, you may have a problem however:
1) You may not want to have a phone connected to the server all the time
2) I don't know if you can sent
art of this process ?
Eg,
> Use their gateway ? Or can I do it all myself ?
>
> Thanks all !
>
I was looking for something similar (sending SMS via a linux tool),
the other day, as i want to have scripts to monitor my servers, and
text me a daily report, of number of HTTP requests
of this process ? Eg,
> Use their gateway ? Or can I do it all myself ?
If you can receive emails on your phone, there shouldn't be anything
more to it than ensuring that your phone bill's paid.
-
What in the world is with that ridiculou
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to send the subject of an email via SMS.
Is this possible with any packages thru Debian ?
Can anyone direct me to any information about SMS > Email ?
Do I require a Mobile Phone company to be part of this process ? Eg,
Use their gateway ? Or can I d
I've read untill I'm blue in the face with regard to get the Linksys
WPC11 Ver. 3 card working. The problem is I'm instructed to download
some files from TLDP, however this kind of defeats the purpose dontcha
think, I dont have a internet connection. This email is sent from a
working laptop
hi,
my broadband provider allows me to view video via a multicast. I can't
find any tool for iptables that makes this work. I see igmp-packets on
both sides of my gateway - but ofcourse it is not forwarded.
Is there any NAT-module for IGMP/Multicast? Or anyone else made this
work?
//BR N
This is a filter detection notice generated by Sendmail Attachment
Filter v2.5.0 at gateway. The original message was being transferred
from [203.200.66.228], and was ultimately rejected.
The scanned parts of this message contained 1 infection(s), 0 of which
were successfully repaired
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:29:53 -0500, Llsf49 wrote:
>
> > i have a gateway 2000 solo series rolo icant get pass the password it is
> > running windows 98 when i first got the laptop my friend accessed a backdoor
&
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:43:37 -0500
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:16:27 -0500, Johann Koenig wrote:
>
> > On Friday January 2 at 11:39am
> > Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
> >>
> >> >
>
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 12:16:27 -0500, Johann Koenig wrote:
> On Friday January 2 at 11:39am
> Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Don't feed the trolls!
>> >
>>
>> He's not a troll, he's an AOLer,
>
> Which are, by
On Friday January 2 at 11:39am
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>
> >
> > Don't feed the trolls!
> >
>
> He's not a troll, he's an AOLer,
Which are, by definition, trolls.
--
-johann koenig
Now Playing: Somehow Hollow - Walki
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:29:50 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
>
> Don't feed the trolls!
>
He's not a troll, he's an AOLer, and I felt like being kind this morning :)
--
paul
Programming without a hex editor is like watchmaking without a hammer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:08:45AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:29:53 -0500, Llsf49 wrote:
>
> > i have a gateway 2000 solo series rolo icant get pass the password it is
> > running windows 98 when i first got the laptop my friend accessed a backdoor
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 08:29:53 -0500, Llsf49 wrote:
> i have a gateway 2000 solo series rolo icant get pass the password it is
> running windows 98 when i first got the laptop my friend accessed a backdoor
> allowing us to find out what the password was i imagine anybody with the name
i have a gateway 2000 solo series rolo icant get pass the password it is running windows 98 when i first got the laptop my friend accessed a backdoor allowing us to find out what the password was i imagine anybody with the name debian user will know how to help me with my problem
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 08:23:38AM -0500, Debian User wrote:
> can someone help me as to what i have neglected?
Maybe none of these, maybe all:
(0) Reading the Networking HOWTO
(1) Assuring it's OK to use the 192.168.*.* within your network @ work
(or isolating it (Masquerading-Simple-HOWT
i am interested in placing a gateway between my work network and
my workstation. i have a firewall/gateway at home between my home
lan and my isp. i used my home configuration as a guide but i am
still coming up snake-eyes here at work.
my routing table at work is:
Kernel IP routing table
Hello list,
I was wondering, because I've never been able to do
this, if or how you can have a Linux computer access the Internet via a Win98
gateway PC. The gateway runs 602LanSuite for its routing/firewall services. Note
that there are numerous WinXP machines behind the Win98 ma
'd like to be able to set Debian so that it uses
> 192.168.0.1 as it's internet gateway.
>
Just edit your /etc/network/interfaces. It should look like this (I guess
your network interface on your laptop is eth0)
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 ine
able to set Debian so that it
> uses 192.168.0.1 as it's internet gateway.
>
> I've fiddled with route but to no avail. Is there a simple way of
> doing this? How?
Edit /etc/network/interfaces, and add the gateway option:
gateway address
Default gate
Debian so that it uses
> 192.168.0.1 as it's internet gateway.
>
> I've fiddled with route but to no avail. Is there a simple way of doing
> this? How?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Kevin
>
> PS. please cc replies to me, as I'm having problems subscribing
Hi,
I have a win2k box set to do ICS and dial on demand (not the question) -
192.168.0.1
I have my Debian laptop attached to this eth0 192.618.0.10. They share
files via samba. But, I'd like to be able to set Debian so that it uses
192.168.0.1 as it's internet gateway.
I've fid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 04:51:54PM +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I set up a computer to work as a firewall/router for connecting my local
> network to an adsl connection.
> I am trying to set up exim to work as a mail router on that machine. i.e
> I wan
I set up a computer to work as a firewall/router for connecting my local
network to an adsl connection.
I am trying to set up exim to work as a mail router on that machine. i.e
I want it to accept mail from machines on the local network, replace the
from (and possibly reply-to) headers and relay th
Andrew Kasza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have debian 3.0. I have to change the configuration of network (I
> mean I have to change IP, netmask and so on).
>
> I know my IP address, netmask, broadcast.
>
> Is there a way to figure out the network and gateway number?
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kasza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: how to figure out the gateway number?
>
>
> I have debian 3.0. I have to change the configuration
> of network
&g
Andrew Kasza wrote:
I have debian 3.0. I have to change the configuration
of network
(I mean I have to change IP, netmask and so on).
I know my IP address, netmask, broadcast.
Is there a way to figure out the network and gateway
number?
Is it enough to do the following three steps?:
1step 'i
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 18:52, Andrew Kasza wrote:
> I know my IP address, netmask, broadcast.
>
> Is there a way to figure out the network and gateway
> number?
Simple answer:
The gateway is the machine on your network that is connected to the
internet. Unless you have dhcp on your
ot;Class C"
designation) the network address is 192.168.0.0 and the broadcast is
192.168.0.255. (the netmask for a /24 is 255.255.255.0, btw)
| and gateway number?
Ask the network admin. There is no other way to know which node is
the gateway. (DHCP is essentially the same as asking the network
ad
I have debian 3.0. I have to change the configuration
of network
(I mean I have to change IP, netmask and so on).
I know my IP address, netmask, broadcast.
Is there a way to figure out the network and gateway
number?
Is it enough to do the following three steps?:
1step 'ifdown --all'
Lucio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've successfully installed and configured Apache on a already
> working gateway box.
>
> I know this can play a little unusual (web and gateway server in the
> same box) but unfortunately at the moment I just have this hardware
> a
Hi,
after a two days-long headache I've got that probably I need some help.
I've successfully installed and configured Apache on a already working gateway box.
I know this can play a little unusual (web and gateway server in the same box)
but unfortunately at the moment I just have thi
Hi all,
I am trying to install Debian on a Gateway m500
notebook. Installation of the main modules and kernel
goes very smoothly. I didn't select anything extra to
the basic operating system with 'tasksel'.
After the installation finished and I rebooted the
system, a lot of numbers
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:13:37AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Read HOWTO by installing doc-linux-text (which used to be doc-linux).
Um. Not since January 1998, if I read the changelog correctly :)
(Before that it was just 'doc', but that was in 1995 ...)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
You should have asked to the mailing list for help.
I am not your free consultant... but heck...
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:14:06PM -0700, Greg Sims wrote:
> I need to build a network gateway using Debian that has PPPoE, Routing,
> Bandwidth shaping and supports two Ethernet interfaces: In
Hi debian,
I have a problem connecting with my Defualt Gateway
Address when i used a Voip IAD Box which i configured
before now and it worked. Right now my default gateway
is failling in terms of connections.
Kindly tell me how to break the firewalls in a WAN
Network with a default gateway
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
<...>
> What other choice do they have? There arguments have been shown to be
> utter nonsense or outright disinformation.
As a reader who has been following the threads simply for the
entertainment value (I don't do spam filtering or CR, or have an
opinion o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:42:53AM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> No. They are, being spammers at heart, and therefore mortally opposed to
> CR programs, just trying to distract people.
OK, if you're going to call other people libelous, don't libel
every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:12:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> WTF? The gateway is *not at all* read only. Everybody can post after
> registering their own email address with the authorization mailing list,
> as explained in the m
On Aug 08, Anthony Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-> Veering [further] off-topic, I notice that at least one other person
>-> has posted a genuine question to the News gateway in the last few days
>-> (the person was admirably helped by someone else reading and pos
Can you advise about the following?
$ squidclient -h iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net -p 80 /iptables-tutorial.html
HTTP/1.0 504 Gateway Timeout
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 05:38:09 GMT
Content-Length: 278
Content-Type: text/html
Server: NetCache appliance (NetApp/5.3.1R3D1)
504 Gateway Timeout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:33:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Newsgroup descriptions are the proper repository for this information.
I'm not sure the group description lets people know that it's read-only.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL
[Open message Cc'ed to Marco d'Itri]
I am interested in seeing a short, descriptive, automated post on the
debian-user gateway (and to the debian-user gateway only), and have
posted about this recently to the list.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200308/msg
On August 7, 2003 09:39 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:42:53AM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > No. They are, being spammers at heart, and therefore mortally
> > opposed to CR programs, just trying to distract people.
>
> OK, if
Leo Spalteholz([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Do you guys really have nothing better to do than throw accusations at
> each other all day long? Today I count ... ah screw it theres way
> too many emails to count just from Alan and Paul.
> Just take your childish arguments off li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:52:19AM -0300, Anthony Rowe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:33:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > Newsgroup descriptions are the proper repository for this information.
>
> Are you referring to those very short
At 2003-08-07T16:42:53Z, Alan Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No. They are, being spammers at heart, and therefore mortally opposed to
> CR programs, just trying to distract people.
>
> What other choice do they have? There arguments have been shown to be
> utter nonsense or outright disinfor
Hallo!
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which newsgroups are you gatewaying to, and which groups are
> read-only? I think if we isolate that, we might be able to move
> forward.
I'm reading the ML as 'gmane.linux.debian.user' and I think I also
have 'linux.debian.user' in my list.
Th
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:12:11PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> WTF? The gateway is *not at all* read only.
Fair enough, but occasionally people post in a vacuum, so to speak.
Here are two (News) message-ID's of articles posted to the debian-user
gateway as News which never reache
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 09:40:20 2003
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:33:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > Newsgroup descriptions are the proper repository for this information.
>
> Are you referring to those very short descriptions consisting of a few
> words which are di
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:42:53AM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 7 09:40:20 2003
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:33:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > >
> > > Newsgroup descriptions are the proper repository for this information.
> >
> > Are you referr
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:33:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Newsgroup descriptions are the proper repository for this information.
Are you referring to those very short descriptions consisting of a few
words which are displayed next to one's subscribed groups as a very
general introduct
on Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:38:48AM -0300, Anthony Rowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Veering [further] off-topic, I notice that at least one other person
> has posted a genuine question to the News gateway in the last few days
> (the person was admirably helped by someone else reading an
On 0, Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subba Rao, 2003-Apr-02 18:43 -0500:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > My system is running Debian 3.0 (Woody) Linux.
> >
> > I use this Linux system as the gateway for my home LAN. It has 2 interfaces
> > eth0 and e
Subba Rao, 2003-Apr-02 18:43 -0500:
>
> Hi,
>
> My system is running Debian 3.0 (Woody) Linux.
>
> I use this Linux system as the gateway for my home LAN. It has 2 interfaces
> eth0 and eth1.
> eth0 - Uses DHCP to connect to the ISP
> eth1 - Uses sta
Hi,
My system is running Debian 3.0 (Woody) Linux.
I use this Linux system as the gateway for my home LAN. It has 2
interfaces
eth0 and eth1.
eth0 - Uses DHCP to connect to the ISP
eth1 - Uses static IP address (10.10.10.10)
Now I want to switch the home LAN to DHCP environment. I have a
Hi,
My system is running Debian 3.0 (Woody) Linux.
I use this Linux system as the gateway for my home LAN. It has 2 interfaces
eth0 and eth1.
eth0 - Uses DHCP to connect to the ISP
eth1 - Uses static IP address (10.10.10.10)
Now I want to switch the home LAN to DHCP
Hello all,
I would like to thank all the people who spent their time to reply me.
I should sent the e-mail before read the manuals and search google.
Regards,
Pavlos
--
~~
I love having the feeling of being in control
while i have the sensation of speed
The surfer of
Hello all,
I would like to thank all the people who spent their time to reply me.
I should sent the e-mail before read the manuals and search google.
Regards,
Pavlos
--
~~
I love having the feeling of being in control
while i have the sensation of speed
The surfer of
Pavlos Parissis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am looking for the file that I have to modify in order to have static route
> enabled.
> I add the gateway manually with route add -net default gw 192.168.100.1
> and I would like to find the config file.
You're almost cer
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:28:51AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am looking for the file that I have to modify in order to have static route
> enabled.
> I add the gateway manually with route add -net default gw 192.168.100.1
> and I would like to find the conf
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:28:51AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> I am looking for the file that I have to modify in order to have static route
> enabled.
> I add the gateway manually with route add -net default gw 192.168.100.1
> and I would like to find the config file.
> I am
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:28:51AM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am looking for the file that I have to modify in order to have static route
> enabled.
It's /etc/network/interfaces, man 5 interfaces. Somethnig that isn't
stated in the docs, put your default option under the interf
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am looking for the file that I have to modify in order to have static route
> enabled.
> I add the gateway manually with route add -net default gw 192.168.100.1
> and I would like to find the config file.
> I am usin
Hello all,
I am looking for the file that I have to modify in order to have static route
enabled.
I add the gateway manually with route add -net default gw 192.168.100.1
and I would like to find the config file.
I am using woody 3.0.r1,any ideas?
Pavlos
--
~~
I
but i
get
my resolv.conf overwritten (By the dhcp client on interface Eth1) and my route looks
like this :
Kernel IP routing table
---
Destination Gateway Genmask Iface
194.236.xx.xx 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0eth0
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248
louie miranda wrote:
nope, make it 2 gateway..
But ex if they're accessing www.yahoo.com
they will pass on my other gateway eth2
>>It is not anymore failing, but is it possible for ex.
>>I have a LAN thats on 10.0.0.0/24 I want them when they access
203.190.77
>>b
nope, make it 2 gateway..
But ex if they're accessing www.yahoo.com
they will pass on my other gateway eth2
--
thanks,
louie miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: T
mean have only one gateway of 203.190.72.110?
Kernel IP routing table
---
Destination Gateway Genmask Iface
203.190.72.104 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 eth0
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 eth1
0.0.0.0 203.190.72.110 0.0.0.0 eth0
miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Shaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: conflict when adding eth2 (diff, gateway)
> louie miranda wrote:
> > Actual i
---
Destination Gateway Genmask Iface
203.190.72.104 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 eth0
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 eth1
0.0.0.0 203.190.72.110 0.0.0.0 eth0
203.190.77.144 203.190.77.156 255.255.255.240 eth2
> I have 3NICS, e
Actual interface..
---
eth0/inet addr:203.190.72.108 Bcast:203.190.72.111 Mask:255.255.255.248
eth1/inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
> eth2/inet addr:203.190.77.156 Mask:255.255.255.240, Not yet added.
Kernel IP routing table
---
Destination Gate
From: Sebastian Canagaratna,Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:22 PM
>
> Hi:
Hi:
> I am thinking of buying either a Dell or Gateway Computer.
> This is to be used with Debian testing or unstable. I am
> particularly worried about hardware incompatibilities,
>
* Sebastian Canagaratna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-02-2003 03:24]:
> Hi: I am thinking of buying either a Dell or Gateway Computer.
> This is to be used with Debian testing or unstable. I am
> particularly worried about hardware incompatibilities, in
> particular integrated grap
Hi: I am thinking of buying either a Dell or Gateway Computer.
This is to be used with Debian testing or unstable. I am
particularly worried about hardware incompatibilities,
in particular integrated graphics, sound etc. I could not find
much with a search on google. I would
Apologies for not responding to the start of the thread - it had gone
before I realised I wanted to contribute ...
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:36:05PM -0500, Neal Lippman wrote:
> >
> > My project is basically to provide a mechanism so someone can email to a
> > an address in my office (eg "[EMA
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:36:05PM -0500, Neal Lippman wrote:
> I was hoping some folks here could give me some suggestions on setting
> up an email to fax gateway.
>
> My project is basically to provide a mechanism so someone can email to a
> an address in my office (eg "[EM
I was hoping some folks here could give me some suggestions on setting
up an email to fax gateway.
My project is basically to provide a mechanism so someone can email to a
an address in my office (eg "[EMAIL PROTECTED]") and have that email
automatically faxed out. This idea is to eli
ent as eth0 then
you must specify a gateway that you can use to reach it. Basically the
gateway must be directly reachable to you, perhaps something like this:
route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 193.32.100.244
(the above being entirely speculation and likely wrong, hopefully y
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: making 2 gateway..
> louie miranda said:
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> > Iface
> > 193.32.100.244 203.191.11.157 255.255.2
louie miranda said:
> ic, i was wondering how could i add it? I really can't add again another
> route.
>
> Im trying
>
> route add -net 10.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 10.0.0.1
>
> but it didnt work..
10.0.0.1 must be on a network you are connected to in order to establish
a route to it, from t
louie miranda said:
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 193.32.100.244 203.191.11.157 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 00
> eth0 203.191.11.144 * 255.255.255.240 U 0 0
>
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
193.32.100.244 203.191.11.157 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 00 eth0
203.191.11.144 * 255.255.255.240 U 0 00 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0
I am considering purchasing this notebook and installing Debian on it.
I've checked linux-on-laptops.com and mobilix.org for info on this
laptop, without any luck. I also couldn't find any help on Google about
installing linux on this particular model (or even family).
Does anyone here have this
| > connection was hung up.
| >
| > The output from ifconfig -a is comparable to a SuSE connection but
| > netstat -r shows that the SuSE connection sets the default gateway to
| > the remote IP address provided by T-Online while the debian connection
| > routing table shows no ga
fault gateway to
the remote IP address provided by T-Online while the debian connection
routing table shows no gatewate setup for default even though the
destination host is properly set.
Therefore, I suspect that my debian ISDN configuration is not setting
the default gateway. I need someone's
ter a minute or so Mozilla reports that the connection was not
accepted. Furthermore, isdnctrl and /var/log/isdn shows that the
connection was hung up.
The output from ifconfig -a is comparable to a SuSE connection but
netstat -r shows that the SuSE connection sets the default gateway to
the remo
tion of the "Local Area Connection
> Properties" and I checked "never dial a connection" in IE's "Internet
> Options". Yes, I was using IE on the XP machine to access the web
> through the Debian gateway.
>
> I then began testing; let the link die after
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
Giving XP the gateway and then setting up Debian to just forward these
requests makes it a lot easier to maintain tho. I have setup my friends XP
with only the gateway and it works, the server isn't Debian but SME Mitel
(www.e-smith.org). My server has the option to be a DNS proxy but I t
erties are:
> > IP address 192.168.1.2
> > Subnet mask 255.255.255.0
> > Default gateway 192.168.1.1
Telling XP that it should not dial a connection should help, but the
problem is that the XP machine has no name servers, hence it cannot
resolve host names. To fix this, tell XP about
rest of the stuff some one else will have to help you with as I've
always just said 'Do this' and it has done it for me so far.
Craig
- Original Message -
From: "Barry Mathieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2
#x27;m also unfortunately on a tight
deadline to have the system running. I currently use dial-up (PPPd) but
I will be switching most likely cable for necessary high speed (PPPoE).
I'm running Debian Woody with kernel 2.2.20. I have the stock 'ipmasq'
package installed and running.
501 - 600 of 883 matches
Mail list logo