El Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:11:45 +0200
Manolo Díaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:53:48 -0300
Pablo Santamaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
192.168.88.00.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 0
0 eth0
Si eth0 está configurada para una red 192.168.88.0 con
What might I do Linux-wise to create a system that looked at multiple
gateways and then assigned (via DHCP) the gateway that was the least
congested?
Anyone have any good suggestions in this department?
(I am planning on having a temporary wireless mesh with several
satellite uplinks
What might I do Linux-wise to create a system that looked at multiple
gateways and then assigned (via DHCP) the gateway that was the least
congested?
Anyone have any good suggestions in this department?
(I am planning on having a temporary wireless mesh with several
satellite uplinks, and I
Gustavo, as estações não pingam ninguém... nem mesmo o gateway. Verifiquei a
tabela arp no gateway e o MAC está batendo com o da máquina que estava testando.
Att.
Jackson R. Meireles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Mensagem original
De: Gustavo Moreira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Jackson R. Meireles
Olá pessoal, estou com o seguinte problema:
Tenho um gateway (Debian) que faz NAT para várias classes diferentes
(192.168.x.). Acontece que a algumas semanas os computadores de uma das classes
não conseguem navegar na Internet a não ser que elas sejam pingadas. A partir
do momento em que
Olá,
E a partir das estações, elas pingam alguém?! Parece algo relacionado
a ARP. Verifique as tabelas ARP qdo estiver ocorrendo o problema e
depois de solucionado.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hola lista:
Estoy tratando de montar un gateway de correo para filtrar spam como los
que hacen panda, mcafee, etc.
La idea es que el gateway vaya por delante del servidor de correo y se
transparente, para esto tendría que funcionar en modo bridge.
Alguien sabe cómo se podría armar? Entiendo
el
se encargue no desde iptables sino desde la
configuracion del servidor de correo.
Saludos!
Lo que implicaría que el bridge tend#341;ia que tener sí o sí asignar una
ip al bridge, y un default gateway. Que se que suelen asignar para acceder
para tareas administrativas.
Voy a seguir
servidor de correo.
Saludos!
Lo que implicaría que el bridge tend#341;ia que
tener sí o sí asignar una
ip al bridge, y un default gateway. Que se que
suelen asignar para acceder
para tareas administrativas.
Voy a seguir investigando, gracias
--- Federico Alberto Sayd [EMAIL PROTECTED
El Dl Maig 5 2008 19:22, Federico Alberto Sayd va escriure:
dea es que el gateway vaya por delante del servidor de correo y se
transparente, para esto tendría que funcionar en modo bridge.
Alguien sabe cómo se podría armar? Entiendo que si se usa iptables se
puede redireccionar todo el trafico
ciracusa escribió:
Hola Lista.
En un equipo tengo problemas con el Clamav, el cual consume bastantes
recursos.
El equipo tiene características modestas, no obstante quería saber si
hay algún tip o aspecto a tener en cuenta que pueda tocar sobre clamav
(o sobre el Sistema operativo Debian
Hola Lista.
En un equipo tengo problemas con el Clamav, el cual consume bastantes
recursos.
El equipo tiene características modestas, no obstante quería saber si
hay algún tip o aspecto a tener en cuenta que pueda tocar sobre clamav
(o sobre el Sistema operativo Debian Etch) para mejorar su
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:57:52 +0100
e s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micha wrote:
Is it possible to stream music from my bluetooth phone (ericson) to my linux
box as an audio gateway (have the music sound from my pc speakers)?
thanks
looks like I was wrong, as the BlueZ site is
http
On 18 mar, 04:20, Miguel Da Silva - Centro de Matemática
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristian Mitchell escreveu:
2008/3/16, Roberto Pereyra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hola a todos
¿Alguien conoce algún tutorial para instalar un servidor gateway
antispam/antivirus para filtrar el tráfico de un
, March 16, 2008 20:46, Roberto Pereyra wrote:
Hola a todos
¿Alguien conoce algún tutorial para instalar un servidor gateway
antispam/antivirus para filtrar el tráfico de un servidor de correo ?
El gateway debe estar en un equipo aparte del servidor de correo.
Es importante que tenga una
Is it possible to stream music from my bluetooth phone (ericson) to my linux
box as an audio gateway (have the music sound from my pc speakers)?
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Micha wrote:
Is it possible to stream music from my bluetooth phone (ericson) to my linux
box as an audio gateway (have the music sound from my pc speakers)?
thanks
I'm just looking for the same thing. Here's a good explanation
http://www.think-future.de/wiki/index.php?title=Bluetooth
Micha wrote:
Is it possible to stream music from my bluetooth phone (ericson) to my linux
box as an audio gateway (have the music sound from my pc speakers)?
thanks
looks like I was wrong, as the BlueZ site is
http://wiki.bluez.org/wiki/HOWTO/AudioDevices
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
2008/3/16, Roberto Pereyra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hola a todos
¿Alguien conoce algún tutorial para instalar un servidor gateway
antispam/antivirus para filtrar el tráfico de un servidor de correo ?
El gateway debe estar en un equipo aparte del servidor de correo.
Es importante que tenga
Cristian Mitchell escreveu:
2008/3/16, Roberto Pereyra [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hola a todos
¿Alguien conoce algún tutorial para instalar un servidor gateway
antispam/antivirus para filtrar el tráfico de un servidor de correo ?
El gateway debe estar en un equipo aparte del servidor de correo
Hola a todos
¿Alguien conoce algún tutorial para instalar un servidor gateway
antispam/antivirus para filtrar el tráfico de un servidor de correo ?
El gateway debe estar en un equipo aparte del servidor de correo.
Es importante que tenga una interface para recuperar los correos en cuarentena
Roberto Pereyra escreveu:
Hola a todos
¿Alguien conoce algún tutorial para instalar un servidor gateway
antispam/antivirus para filtrar el tráfico de un servidor de correo ?
El gateway debe estar en un equipo aparte del servidor de correo.
Es importante que tenga una interface para recuperar
local
funciona sin problemas, por que razon el ping al gateway reactiva la
salida a internet?
Gracias por su colaboracion.
--
Imagination is more important than knowlege
A.E.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
supuestamente
bien, las tablas de enrutamiento estan correctas y la red local
funciona sin problemas, por que razon el ping al gateway reactiva la
salida a internet?
Gracias por su colaboracion.
--
Imagination is more important than knowlege
A.E.
--
Imagination is more
Boa noite,
Vejam só meu problema: Instalei o Opwnswan par ausar um serviço da
TIM, mas os mesmos só aceitam que trafegue no tunel VPN, um IP valido. Na
configuracao, consta um mesmo IP para fechar o tunel e trafegar. Openswan
instalado e configurado, tunel fechado.
Cleber escreveu:
pessoal estou com debian servindo dhcp e internet para as estaçoes, e
com 2k3 em AD, estou tendo problemas com estações xp, pois no
propriedades de rede aparece uma conexao virtual chamata gatway da
internt e quando esse icone aparece a conexao fica caindo e muitas
vezes a
pessoal estou com debian servindo dhcp e internet para as estaçoes, e com
2k3 em AD, estou tendo problemas com estações xp, pois no propriedades de
rede aparece uma conexao virtual chamata gatway da internt e quando esse
icone aparece a conexao fica caindo e muitas vezes a pessoa nao consegue
.
Saludos
El 14/11/07, xpeed . [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola Usuario,
la ip de la maquina linux seguramente es 172.16.6.163 y tu gateway debe ser
172.16.6.254
esa dirección 169.254.0.0/16 es una direcció típica de errores tcp/ip, por
lo tanto asumo que algo no anda muy bien asi que te
trata de conectarse a ese servidor como si se tratara de
un proxy que obviamente no resuelve. Yo intente conectarme a ese
servidor, para usarlo como proxy a traves de firefox, no pude y lo
deje que se conectara por el gateway de mi maquina. Borre lo
registrado en firefox. Pero no se si haya modo que
. Yo intente conectarme a ese
servidor, para usarlo como proxy a traves de firefox, no pude y lo
deje que se conectara por el gateway de mi maquina. Borre lo
registrado en firefox. Pero no se si haya modo que linux o el kernel o
no se se este confundiendo. El Ifconfig me muestra claramente que el
Gracias xpeed.
Hice esto:
$ ip route show
172.16.6.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.16.6.163
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 scope link metric 1000
default via 172.16.6.254 dev eth0 metric 100
Yo creo que src es la IP de la maquina y no el gateway. El gateway
esta bien, es por donde
Hola Usuario,
la ip de la maquina linux seguramente es 172.16.6.163 y tu gateway debe ser
172.16.6.254
esa dirección 169.254.0.0/16 es una direcció típica de errores tcp/ip, por
lo tanto asumo que algo no anda muy bien asi que te recomendaria re iniciar
tu servicio networking si configuras
that They are not expected to be routable on
the global Internet and They are routable inside of a more limited
area such a site.
As you can see, RFC4193 addresses are the equivalent of RFC1918 IPv4
addresses for IPv6.
When using this kind of address as static (iface ... static), the
default gateway
.
Cuando se cae la conexion de Internet principal, se cambia el gateway
del server a otra ip que tambien es interna y posee una segunda
conexion de Internet. Normalmente tiene de gateway 192.168.1.1 y la
alterna es 192.168.1.55 (ambas tienen conexiones de Internet y en
ambas esta enmascarado)
Cuando
hi,
I have a small LAN with about 3 windows machiens, 1 debian server
(etch), and adsl router with 4 ports.
Currently, I am using the router as a gateway (192.168.0.1), and the
debian server is 192.168.0.254. The client machiens are configured to
use 192.168.0.1 as a gateway.
What i need to do
On Sunday 28 Oct 2007, meekaaku kaaku wrote:
hi,
I have a small LAN with about 3 windows machiens, 1 debian server
(etch), and adsl router with 4 ports.
Currently, I am using the router as a gateway (192.168.0.1), and the
debian server is 192.168.0.254. The client machiens are configured
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:54:57AM +0500, meekaaku kaaku wrote:
I have a small LAN with about 3 windows machiens, 1 debian server
(etch), and adsl router with 4 ports.
Currently, I am using the router as a gateway (192.168.0.1), and the
debian server is 192.168.0.254. The client machiens
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:54:57AM +0500, meekaaku kaaku wrote:
I have a small LAN with about 3 windows machiens, 1 debian server
(etch), and adsl router with 4 ports.
Currently, I am using the router as a gateway (192.168.0.1), and the
debian server is 192.168.0.254
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:13:08AM +0200, steef wrote:
Moderation Robot wrote:
[...]
can anybody tell me on the debian list who this is/these are? i never sent
a message to this (fake?) list!
AFAIK this is a mail-news gateway used by many posters here and it
appears to be broken ATM. I'm
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 01:13:08AM +0200, steef wrote:
Moderation Robot wrote:
[...]
can anybody tell me on the debian list who this is/these are? i never sent
a message to this (fake?) list!
AFAIK this is a mail-news gateway used by many posters here
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 09:58:11AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
As for the mails you are receiving directly (like I do as well), you
will have to setup a filter :(
Ah, no. I've got better things to do with my time. I just won't post
for a few days.
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/07 09:36, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 09:58:11AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
As for the mails you are receiving directly (like I do as well), you
will have to setup a filter :(
Ah, no. I've got better things to
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:36:11AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/30/07 09:36, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 09:58:11AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
As for the mails you are receiving directly (like I do as well), you
will have to setup a filter :(
Ah, no. I've
On 09/30/2007 09:36 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 09:58:11AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
As for the mails you are receiving directly (like I do as well), you
will have to setup a filter :(
Ah, no. I've got better things to do with my time. I just won't post
for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/07 12:03, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 10:36:11AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/30/07 09:36, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 09:58:11AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
As for the mails you are
é o seguinte... Fui instalar o Debian Etch e quando tentei configurar as
fontes ele não conseguiu contato com a internet, mesmo eu colocando o endereço
de ip do gateway anteriormente. Enfim acabei ficando só com o sistema básico.
Meu modem é roteado, seria só dar o nº de ip dele e
, mesmo eu colocando o
endereço de ip do gateway anteriormente. Enfim acabei ficando só com o
sistema básico.
Meu modem é roteado, seria só dar o nº de ip dele e pronto o pc deveria
se conectar.
Não sei o que pode ser que esteja acontecendo, porém gostaria de saber
qual o comando para reconfigurar
I need help figuring out how to add a second gateway to eth1, so that ping
-I eth1 www.google.com works as well as through the default gw on eth0
I need it because I'm I have a server with 2 NICs: eth0 is an external IP,
eth1 is connected to the private LAN (192.168.0.) and this server
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:19:33 -0300
Andre Novelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[moved his quote of my message here]
On 4/18/07, Celejar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:37:44 -0300
Andre Novelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I`m a new happy owner of a gateway laptop
Bill wrote:
On Thu, 2006-21-12 at 18:46 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:42:38AM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway?
Other than using the route command - that won't survive a reboot.
I have a new router
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:05:03PM -0800, Bill wrote:
On Thu, 2006-21-12 at 21:17 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi,
Well, as you can see from below the file contains statements like
please do not modify the following
On Fri, 2006-22-12 at 09:32 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How should I go about bringing this to the attention of the Debian
developers? A wishlist bug against the Debian policy manual maybe?
-- hendrik
I've never done that, but grub seems to do this sort of thing nicely.
You might
On Thu, 2006-21-12 at 16:07 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
are you talking about the public ip or the private, lan-side ip of
this router?
The gateway ip is referring the lan side of the router.
I've never seen anything like this before. usually,
/etc/network/interfaces is *MUCH
On Fri, 2006-22-12 at 10:30 -0800, Bill wrote:
Yes. This is what I'm going to do. Byte the bullet so to speak and
just change the gateway line with an editor. We'll see what happens,
although I don't like trial and error. Having googled my finger off, I
now know that there are only three files
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 09:32:29AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:05:03PM -0800, Bill wrote:
On Thu, 2006-21-12 at 21:17 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi,
Well, as you can see from below the
Bill, I accused you of not replying to the list... before reading the
list. sorry.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:09:44PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Bill, I accused you of not replying to the list... before reading the
list. sorry.
doh. and then I forgot to cc the list on the reply to your supposed
off-list reply. I gotta get some sleep for sure.
A
signature.asc
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway?
Other than using the route command - that won't survive a reboot.
I have a new router with a different IP and need to configure
accordingly.
I find the basic data is in /etc/network/interfaces, but it's a
no-edit file
10.0.0.0
gateway 10.0.10.6
Put the gateway option in yours interfaces configuration script, now
your route will survive a reboot. I wish i could help you.
Bye.
Em Qui, 2006-12-21 às 03:42 -0800, Bill escreveu:
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway
# The primary network interface
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 10.0.10.10
netmask 255.255.0.0
broadcast 10.0.255.255
network 10.0.0.0
gateway 10.0.10.6
Put the gateway option in yours interfaces configuration script, now your
route will survive
Hi,
Bill schrieb:
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway?
Other than using the route command - that won't survive a reboot.
man route.conf
might help.
Greeetings,
/\\atthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Hi,
Myself wrote:
Hi,
Bill schrieb:
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway?
Other than using the route command - that won't survive a reboot.
man route.conf
might help.
Greeetings,
/\\atthias
Oops, this was SuSE-specific, please ignore!
Sorry
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:42:38AM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway?
Other than using the route command - that won't survive a reboot.
I have a new router with a different IP and need to configure
accordingly.
I find the basic data
On Thu, 2006-21-12 at 18:46 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:42:38AM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway?
Other than using the route command - that won't survive a reboot.
I have a new router with a different
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Bill wrote:
On Thu, 2006-21-12 at 18:46 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:42:38AM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi folks,
What is the best way to change the IP address of a gateway?
Other than using the route command - that won't
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi,
Well, as you can see from below the file contains statements like
please do not modify the following line.
Do you suppose maybe that every program that creates a configuration
file with comments like that should further identify
On Thu, 2006-21-12 at 21:17 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 01:28:45PM -0800, Bill wrote:
Hi,
Well, as you can see from below the file contains statements like
please do not modify the following line.
Do you suppose maybe that every program that creates a
routing tables, using the peer as the
gateway, when IPCP negotiation is successfully completed. This entry
is removed when the PPP connection is broken.
Pozdrawiam,
Adam
--
Adam Byrtek / Alpha
,,Każdy ideał w ciele jest trywialny'' -- prawdy algebraiczne
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Witam,
Jest tak:
Najzwyczajniej w swiecie skonfigurowana sieć przez eth, zazwyczaj przez
tą właśnie sieć mam internet (w domu), czasem zabieram swój komputer ze
sobą do mojej Pani na kilka dni, wtedy net jest dostępny tylko przez
modem. Modem jest zewnętrzny. Przy użyciu kppp działa w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
ich habe hier einen Debian Sarge Gateway, der bisher über einen ISP per
eth1 an die Außenwelt angebunden war.
eth0 ist das Interface in das lokale Netzwerk.
Standardgateway ist bisher auf eth1
Nun haben wir einen 2. ISP bekommen, der über eth2
Hallo Andreas,
Andreas Richter, 01.09.2006 (d.m.y):
ich habe hier einen Debian Sarge Gateway, der bisher über einen ISP per
eth1 an die Außenwelt angebunden war.
eth0 ist das Interface in das lokale Netzwerk.
Standardgateway ist bisher auf eth1
Nun haben wir einen 2. ISP bekommen, der
am Fri, dem 01.09.2006, um 11:17:06 +0200 mailte Andreas Richter folgendes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
ich habe hier einen Debian Sarge Gateway, der bisher über einen ISP per
eth1 an die Außenwelt angebunden war.
eth0 ist das Interface in das lokale Netzwerk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Schmidt schrieb:
Hallo Andreas,
Hi,
Leg die Default Route auf eth2 und lass den MTA nur auf lo und eth1
lauschen.
hab ich schon probiert. Geht aber nicht, da Anfragen von außen auf eth1
nicht korrekt beantwortet werden. Wie geschrieben
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Kretschmer schrieb:
am Fri, dem 01.09.2006, um 11:17:06 +0200 mailte Andreas Richter folgendes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
ich habe hier einen Debian Sarge Gateway, der bisher über einen ISP per
eth1 an die
Hallo Andreas,
Andreas Richter, 01.09.2006 (d.m.y):
Andreas Kretschmer schrieb:
Wie kommen die Mails rein, holst Du sie ab via POP?
Kommen direkt hier an. Die IP auf eth1 ist MX.
Der Hostname, nicht die IP-Adresse. ;-)
Gruss,
Christian Schmidt
--
Es ist jetzt ja auch eine Statistik
Kann man nicht einfach per iptables sämtlichen Verkehr auf Port 25 auf
eth1 umbiegen? Außer Mail geht sonst nix über die alte Leitung?
Ansonsten würde ich einfach den mx-Eintrag auf den neuen ISP ändern
(lassen). Oder gibt es einen anderen Grund die zweite Leitung zu bezahlen?
Edward
--
Hi,
Andreas Richter wrote:
Hi,
ich habe hier einen Debian Sarge Gateway, der bisher über einen ISP per
eth1 an die Außenwelt angebunden war.
eth0 ist das Interface in das lokale Netzwerk.
Standardgateway ist bisher auf eth1
Nun haben wir einen 2. ISP bekommen, der über eth2 an das
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:37:55PM +0200, Joerg Zimmermann wrote:
Jetzt gibt es zwei Lösungen:
Entweder Du setzt einen 'richtigen' dynamischen Router auf (z.B.
zebra), oder Du beschäftigst Dich mit dem Paketfilter auf Deinem
Router. Ich weiss das es mit dem Paketfilter unter OpenBSD dafür
Hallo Martin,
Martin Reising, 01.09.2006 (d.m.y):
Wie soll man mit nur einem Computer ohne AS mit 2 x /30 Upstream,
wobei der MX nur in einem der beiden /30 liegt, dafür sorgen das alles
außer inbound SMTP über das andere /30 geroutet wird?
Was meinst Du mit AS?
Gruss,
Christian Schmidt
--
Ad 2006-09-01, Andreas Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Christian Schmidt schrieb:
Leg die Default Route auf eth2 und lass den MTA nur auf lo und
eth1 lauschen.
hab ich schon probiert. Geht aber nicht, da Anfragen von außen auf
eth1 nicht korrekt beantwortet werden. Wie geschrieben
Hi,
Martin Reising wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:37:55PM +0200, Joerg Zimmermann wrote:
Jetzt gibt es zwei Lösungen:
Entweder Du setzt einen 'richtigen' dynamischen Router auf (z.B.
zebra), oder Du beschäftigst Dich mit dem Paketfilter auf Deinem
Router. Ich weiss das es mit dem
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:02:28PM +0200, Christian Schmidt wrote:
Martin Reising, 01.09.2006 (d.m.y):
Wie soll man mit nur einem Computer ohne AS mit 2 x /30 Upstream,
wobei der MX nur in einem der beiden /30 liegt, dafür sorgen das alles
außer inbound SMTP über das andere /30 geroutet
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 12:12 schrieb Edward von Flottwell:
Kann man nicht einfach per iptables sämtlichen Verkehr auf Port 25 auf
eth1 umbiegen? Außer Mail geht sonst nix über die alte Leitung?
Zu umständlich im Moment ;)
Ansonsten würde ich einfach den mx-Eintrag auf den neuen ISP
On Friday 01 September 2006 15:02, Christian Schmidt wrote:
Hallo Martin,
Martin Reising, 01.09.2006 (d.m.y):
Wie soll man mit nur einem Computer ohne AS mit 2 x /30 Upstream,
wobei der MX nur in einem der beiden /30 liegt, dafür sorgen das alles
außer inbound SMTP über das andere /30
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 11:17 schrieb Andreas Richter:
[2x ISP]
Ich denk die Antworten auf die Pings und Mail-Versuche gehen nicht über
eth1 raus, sondern über das neue eth2.
Wie kann ich das umbiegen? Hat jemand eine Idee oder ein Tutorial zu
o.g. Problem?
Den Hinweis zu lartc.org
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 16:10 schrieb Micha Beyer:
Am Freitag, 1. September 2006 11:17 schrieb Andreas Richter:
[2x ISP]
Ich denk die Antworten auf die Pings und Mail-Versuche gehen nicht über
eth1 raus, sondern über das neue eth2.
Wie kann ich das umbiegen? Hat jemand eine Idee
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 03:23:12PM +0200, Joerg Zimmermann wrote:
Martin Reising wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 01:37:55PM +0200, Joerg Zimmermann wrote:
Jetzt gibt es zwei Lösungen:
Entweder Du setzt einen 'richtigen' dynamischen Router auf (z.B.
zebra), oder Du beschäftigst Dich mit dem
Am 2006-07-19 20:48:24, schrieb Michele Della Marina:
Hello all!
Can someone suggest me a SMS Gateway service?
I have no knowledge about it, but my desire is learn something ... can
you send me a link or a good tutorial?
There is an SMS-Server in Debian andit support up to
32 Cellphones
ciracusa escribió:
Alejandro wrote:
Hola gente, supongan que tengo en Debian una interface eth0 para la cual
especifico en /etc/network/interfaces que su gateway es 200.0.0.1 por
ejemplo, y supongan que luego creo una interface virtual (IP alias)
sobre eth0 llamada eth0:1, mi pregunta es la
Hola gente, supongan que tengo en Debian una interface eth0 para la cual
especifico en /etc/network/interfaces que su gateway es 200.0.0.1 por
ejemplo, y supongan que luego creo una interface virtual (IP alias)
sobre eth0 llamada eth0:1, mi pregunta es la siguiente:
Debo configurar ademas en /etc
Alejandro wrote:
Hola gente, supongan que tengo en Debian una interface eth0 para la cual
especifico en /etc/network/interfaces que su gateway es 200.0.0.1 por
ejemplo, y supongan que luego creo una interface virtual (IP alias)
sobre eth0 llamada eth0:1, mi pregunta es la siguiente:
Debo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alejandro escribió:
Hola gente, supongan que tengo en Debian una interface eth0 para la cual
especifico en /etc/network/interfaces que su gateway es 200.0.0.1 por
ejemplo, y supongan que luego creo una interface virtual (IP alias)
sobre eth0
If you are looking free open source gateway, test Kannel
(http://www.kannel.org).
But if you need really easy, non production gateway for personal purposes,
plug your Nokia phone to your computer with a cable and send messages using
Gnokii (http://www.gnokii.org). In gnokii package
Hello all!
Can someone suggest me a SMS Gateway service?
I have no knowledge about it, but my desire is learn something ... can
you send me a link or a good tutorial?
Thanks
--
Michele Della Marina
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
Michele Della Marina wrote:
Can someone suggest me a SMS Gateway service?
Do you mean for sending text messages to people's phones via email, or
something else?
- Joe
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
yes, this is my intent... using a PBX with GSM support and cutting the
CTI application (expensive and microsoft systems dipendent :(
.. is possible?
On 7/19/06, Joe Emenaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michele Della Marina wrote:
Can someone suggest me a SMS Gateway service?
Do you mean
Michele Della Marina wrote:
yes, this is my intent... using a PBX with GSM support and cutting the
CTI application (expensive and microsoft systems dipendent :(
.. is possible?
Well, in the US, each mobile phone provider has their own email-to-SMS
gateway (http://www.notepage.net/smtp.htm
You could try using an email-to-sms gateway service -- many ISPs and
telecommunications companies offer such a service.
Michele Della Marina wrote:
yes, this is my intent... using a PBX with GSM support and cutting the
CTI application (expensive and microsoft systems dipendent
Yes, but I would like to install a personal gateway server, so I'm
looking for documentation
On 7/19/06, Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could try using an email-to-sms gateway service -- many ISPs and
telecommunications companies offer such a service.
Michele Della Marina wrote:
yes
Michele Della Marina wrote:
Yes, but I would like to install a personal gateway server, so I'm
looking for documentation
On 7/19/06, Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could try using an email-to-sms gateway service -- many ISPs and
telecommunications companies offer such a service
501 - 600 of 1518 matches
Mail list logo
