Hi again,
27 août 2023, 18:46 de l0f...@tuta.io:
>>> ClamAV scan files but data scanned: 0.00 MB, why? I have Debian stable and
>>> use last version of clamav (1.0.1+dfsg-2)
>>> , which is located in debian stable repository.
>>>
I don't think your file has been scanned actually...
Can you
Hello Takota,
>> ClamAV scan files but data scanned: 0.00 MB, why? I have Debian stable and
>> use last version of clamav (1.0.1+dfsg-2)
>> , which is located in debian stable repository.
>>
Maybe someone on this list will be able to help you, otherwise I recommend you
write to ClamAV dedicated
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023 17:01:22 +0600
Tatoka wrote:
Hello Tatoka,
>1. Is Subscribing to mailing list free?
Yes. All that's needed is a valid email address to sign up with.
>2. I have problem with ClamAv:
Sorry, can't help with that as I have no experience with ClamAV.
--
Regards _
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 05:01:22PM +0600, Tatoka wrote:
> Hello, dear users community of debian! I just wanna ask questions:
> 1. Is Subscribing to mailing list free?
Yes, it is. I am subscribed, so I know :)
> 2. I have problem with ClamAv: When I scanned file:
> --- SCAN SUMMARY
Hello, dear users community of debian! I just wanna ask questions:
1. Is Subscribing to mailing list free?
2. I have problem with ClamAv: When I scanned file:
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 8671927
Engine version: 1.0.1
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
On Tue 25 Jul 2023 at 08:18:21 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:53:52AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Source Code wrote:
> > > 3. Is it possible to reduce RAM consumption? And minimize it? Let's say up
> > > to 100-200 mb?
> >
> > That depends on what you choose to run,
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:53:52AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
Source Code wrote:
3. Is it possible to reduce RAM consumption? And minimize it? Let's say up
to 100-200 mb?
That depends on what you choose to run, and how. I would not
recommend trying to
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 08:51:59PM +0600, Source Code wrote:
> People, how to solve problem with rfkill without install rfkill?
>
> Вт, 25 июля 2023 г. в 20:31, Michel Verdier :
>
> > On 2023-07-25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >
> > >> And about third question, I mean: dwm and awesome wm. They will
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 09:18:10PM +0600, Source Code wrote:
> I'm sorry, Nicolas George, if I offended you. I didn't want it. I'm new
> here and don't know how to post my questions without disturbing anyone. So
> sorry everyone if my questions have distracted you in any way. I will try
> to
Source Code writes:
> So sorry everyone if my questions have distracted you in any way.
Apology accepted.
> I will try to figure with my problems out myself in future.
It's ok to ask for help again. Just respond politely when people try to
answer your questions.
--
John Hasler
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 09:18:10PM +0600, Source Code wrote:
> I'm sorry, Nicolas George, if I offended you. I didn't want it. I'm new
> here and don't know how to post my questions without disturbing anyone.i
If there is a language barrier here. maybe posting questions on
debian-russian
I'm sorry, Nicolas George, if I offended you. I didn't want it. I'm new
here and don't know how to post my questions without disturbing anyone. So
sorry everyone if my questions have distracted you in any way. I will try
to figure with my problems out myself in future. Thanks everyone!
Вт, 25
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 09:02:36PM +0600, Source Code wrote:
> I have thought I have right to ask any question, for get answers which I
> need :(
Yes, you have. But the answers have the right to not be liked
by you, at least not always :-)
Cheers
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Source Code (12023-07-25):
> I have thought I have right to ask any question
Oh, you have the right all right.
And I have a right of not helping you. Which is exactly what I will do
from now on, since you just spat in my face when I tried to.
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:02:09PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
Oh, forgot the ref:
> Or have a read at the rfkill source [1] [...]
Cheers
[1] https://sources.debian.org/src/rfkill/0.5-1/rfkill.c/
--
t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I have thought I have right to ask any question, for get answers which I
need :(
I have another one question: can I use terminal in Debian Installer without
any problem in the future? What hot keys I need to use? And what’s step in
installer where I can use terminal?
I know about shell in the end
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 04:54:54PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Source Code (12023-07-25):
> > People, how to solve problem with rfkill without install rfkill?
>
> Step 1: get rid of stupid constraints.
>
> Step 2: install rfkill.
Or have a read at the rfkill source [1] and see what you have
Source Code (12023-07-25):
> People, how to solve problem with rfkill without install rfkill?
Step 1: get rid of stupid constraints.
Step 2: install rfkill.
Step 3: solve problem.
Step 4: learn what top-posting means.
Step 5: stop doing it.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
People, how to solve problem with rfkill without install rfkill?
Вт, 25 июля 2023 г. в 20:31, Michel Verdier :
> On 2023-07-25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> >> And about third question, I mean: dwm and awesome wm. They will be
> >> supported in future too?
> >
> > If people use them, and if the
On 2023-07-25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> And about third question, I mean: dwm and awesome wm. They will be
>> supported in future too?
>
> If people use them, and if the upstream developers of these projects
> remain active and responsive, they will likely remain in Debian.
And about dwm I would
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:26:20PM +0600, Source Code wrote:
> I use Debian on my PC not as a server.
>
> Using Debian for PC OS is not good? Is it recommended only for servers?
>
I've only been using it on a PC for 26 years - it is too early to be
certain whether it is good or not.
> And
On 25 Jul 2023 18:26 +0600, from rifesourcec...@gmail.com (Source Code):
> Using Debian for PC OS is not good? Is it recommended only for servers?
Debian is entirely usable as a daily driver workstation OS. I've been
using it as such for around a decade, possibly longer; I have old
notes and
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 06:26:20PM +0600, Source Code wrote:
> I use Debian on my PC not as a server.
>
> Using Debian for PC OS is not good? Is it recommended only for servers?
Both are common. Debian aims to be good for any purpose.
> And about third question, I mean: dwm and awesome wm.
On 25 Jul 2023 08:18 -0400, from g...@wooledge.org (Greg Wooledge):
>>> 3. Is it possible to reduce RAM consumption? And minimize it? Let's say up
>>> to 100-200 mb?
>>
>> That depends on what you choose to run, and how. I would not
>> recommend trying to do anything interesting on a machine with
I use Debian on my PC not as a server.
Using Debian for PC OS is not good? Is it recommended only for servers?
And about third question, I mean: dwm and awesome wm. They will be
supported in future too?
It turns out you need free firmware to use wifi? But I can use wifi, but
only with some DE.
On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:18:21 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:53:52AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Source Code wrote:
> > > 3. Is it possible to reduce RAM consumption? And minimize it?
> > > Let's say up to 100-200 mb?
> >
> > That depends on what you choose to run,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 07:53:52AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Source Code wrote:
> > 3. Is it possible to reduce RAM consumption? And minimize it? Let's say up
> > to 100-200 mb?
>
> That depends on what you choose to run, and how. I would not
> recommend trying to do anything interesting on a
Source Code wrote:
> Hello dear Debian team! I really like this distribution. I use it with
> great pleasure! But I would like to know more about this distribution. I
> wanted to ask you:
debian-users is composed of users of Debian, not a "team".
> 1. After installing Debian without a single
Hello dear Debian team! I really like this distribution. I use it with
great pleasure! But I would like to know more about this distribution. I
wanted to ask you:
1. After installing Debian without a single desktop environment, there is
only a web server, ssh server and standard utilities. Is it
Hi folks,
Thanx for your answers... heres some clarifications...
a) I meant to say Debian XFCE! not Ubuntu XFCE (sorry :D)
b) I have already replaced mousepad for MadEdit (v.nice editor in my
opinion)
c) I know loads of text editors can do multi-file find/replace - but I
want to do this on
c) I know loads of text editors can do multi-file find/replace - but I
want to do this on a massive scale, it would mean opening up every text
file on the file system! - i.e. I want to -on mass- rename something
unique in all configuration files mentioning it
Don't you like CLI instead a GUI
On 5/2/07, Steven Maddox (Architect) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Thanx for your answers... heres some clarifications...
snip
f) on a bizarre connected note, I know that Debian is *rock solid*
stable - but when doing an 'apt-get upgrade' I haven't noticed a since
new thing! is this
Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
c) I know loads of text editors can do multi-file find/replace - but I
want to do this on a massive scale, it would mean opening up every
text file on the file system! - i.e. I want to -on mass- rename
something unique in all configuration files mentioning it
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:54:38AM +0100, Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
Hi folks,
Thanx for your answers... heres some clarifications...
a) I meant to say Debian XFCE! not Ubuntu XFCE (sorry :D)
b) I have already replaced mousepad for MadEdit (v.nice editor in my
opinion)
c) I
Steven Maddox writes:
I want to do this on a massive scale, it would mean opening up every text
file on the file system! - i.e. I want to -on mass- rename something
unique in all configuration files mentioning it
As others have mentioned this is exactly the sort of problem sed was
invented to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/02/07 02:54, Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
[snip]
e) I was after some kind of tray icon auto-updater thingy for the XFCE
Debian to tell me of new updates to Debian 4.0, this is a server however
(I like GUI's don't sue me) so it would be
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:54:38AM +0100, Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
b) I have already replaced mousepad for MadEdit (v.nice editor in my
opinion)
Sounds interesting, but did you compile from source? It's not in Debian
repos (I'm asking because I'm interested in trying a new editor).
Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote in Article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
posted to gmane.linux.debian.user:
1) I need a graphical way of searching text files for a string - and
getting it to replace it (makes for easy re-configuring of files after a
path change)
krename sounds like what you need, though
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:57:06PM +0100, Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
1) I need a graphical way of searching text files for a string - and
getting it to replace it (makes for easy re-configuring of files after a
path change)
cream (gvim) text editor can do that. It's called 'Multi-File
Lo
I've a few burning needs, so if anyone knows the answers - let me know! :D
1) I need a graphical way of searching text files for a string - and
getting it to replace it (makes for easy re-configuring of files after a
path change)
2) Ubuntu had a little graphical app that loaded upon double
Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
2) Ubuntu had a little graphical app that loaded upon double clicking
DEB files, it let you install them - what is this app? :D
gdebi
--
Andrew J. Barr
Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 (compatible; Icedove 1.5; X11; en-US; Linux
2.6.21-rc7 x86_64) Debian/1.5.0.10dfsg.1-3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
Lo
I've a few burning needs, so if anyone knows the answers - let me know! :D
1) I need a graphical way of searching text files for a string - and
getting it to replace it (makes for easy re-configuring of
On Monday 30 April 2007 06:57, Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
Lo
I've a few burning needs, so if anyone knows the answers - let me know! :D
1) I need a graphical way of searching text files for a string - and
getting it to replace it (makes for easy re-configuring of files after a
path
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:11:01 -0700
Alan Ianson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 30 April 2007 06:57, Steven Maddox (Architect) wrote:
Lo
I've a few burning needs, so if anyone knows the answers - let me know! :D
1) I need a graphical way of searching text files for a string - and
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 09:42:16PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:59:22PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:33:00PM -0700, Scott wrote:
The latest official Debian Sarge package for Firefox is for v 1.04!
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 03:11:44PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
I meant what I said. We have OGo connecting to a previously-existing
mysql database, for mailshots etc. It works perfectly well. I can only
speak from my experience.
You mean a mail merge?
--
Chris.
==
Reproduction if
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:59:22PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:33:00PM -0700, Scott wrote:
The latest official Debian Sarge package for Firefox is for v 1.04!
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/mozilla-firefox/
Myself, I don't use Crapfox, and therefore
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:22:02AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Clarification:
When etch transitions from Testing to Stable, all the packages
(including, by that time, OpenOffice.org 2) will stay in etch/Stable.
Is there any known timeline when this my happen?
Juraj Fedel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:29:35AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:46 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Backporting from security fixes in Mozilla or Firefox are to heavy
so they have considered to use 1.07 and rename it for Sarge.
I thought that in those cases they
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 09:52 +0100, Juraj Fedel wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:22:02AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Clarification:
When etch transitions from Testing to Stable, all the packages
(including, by that time, OpenOffice.org 2) will stay in etch/Stable.
Is there any known
Hi Antony,
Am 2005-11-15 11:11:02, schrieb Antony Gelberg:
It's not that simple. A lot of newbies dive into testing or unstable
because they have to have the newest stuff, then they don't know what
to do when their system breaks.
HOW can a newbie come to TESTING or UNSTABLE?
A newbie which
Am 2005-11-17 08:48:33, schrieb loos:
1. Normal = most of them does just that.
I do not know ONE newbie which is using TESTING or UNSTABLE.
2. Debian unstable is just as good as a stable Fedora, etc.
My Development Workstation was broken several times in the last 4
month. There was no
HOW can a newbie come to TESTING or UNSTABLE?
I did. Testing, specifically, and ran into all the trouble one would
expect.
A newbie which come to our website, WILL download STABLE.
False. There are more examples than just I. Unless, of course, by
our you mean some other web site than
newbie - unstable, that's normal. If you like it that way. And they will
learn a lot.
Why is it normal for a newbie to use unstable? It's usually an initial
period of look at me, I'm using Debian without having to use their
cruddy old software followed by a cry for help, either here or
Am 2005-11-13 03:43:00, schrieb Oliver Lupton:
Firefox is currently @ 1.07 and every point release since 1.0 has been
due to security issues.
Following the link you gave, I get to a file such as
mozilla-firefox_1.0.4-2sarge5_i386.deb, I'm not entirely sure what the
'-2' part means, but
Am 2005-11-12 21:59:22, schrieb Marc Wilson:
Myself, I don't use Crapfox, and therefore don't pay any attention to its
Debian versioning, but if normal Debian practices are being followed,
security fixes are backported to stable, rather than new and untested
versions being packaged for
Am 2005-11-14 23:27:29, schrieb Antony Gelberg:
Michael Marsh wrote:
In short, the patched version of Firefox in sarge is *not* 1.0.7, so
calling it 1.0.7 would be a mistake.
Um, as I've said elsewhere in this thread, it is a newer upstream
version than 1.0.4. Not sure exactly what
Am 2005-11-13 11:32:16, schrieb Antony Gelberg:
Bruce Hohl wrote:
OpenOffice 2.0 is an important piece of software.
snip
Why?
Because you will need biger CPU's and more memory in your
computer which will make the manufacturer richer. :-P
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with
Am 2005-11-12 17:05:54, schrieb Antony Gelberg:
Antony Gelberg wrote:
http://www.debian.doc/releases might help you understand how releases
work in Debian.
Oops. s/doc/com
| s/com/org/
Greetings
Michelle
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:46 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2005-11-12 21:59:22, schrieb Marc Wilson:
Myself, I don't use Crapfox, and therefore don't pay any attention to its
Debian versioning, but if normal Debian practices are being followed,
security fixes are backported to stable,
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 22:43 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:26:50AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
I think users need to get back to learning a little. I was asked by a
customer yesterday why Thunderbird doesn't capitalise the H in Hello
like Outlook (Word) does. I was
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 22:23 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 11:11 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Andy Streich wrote:
[snip]
No, it's not, and that's not what I said. I was pointing out that
encouraging newbies to use testing or
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:40:32AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 22:43 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
So it's inefficent. So what?
Because in 6 months or a year, when the size of that quick-and-dirty
DB grows bigger than expected, and becomes vital to the organization
(or
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 22:41 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:40:32AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 22:43 -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
So it's inefficent. So what?
Because in 6 months or a year, when the size of that quick-and-dirty
DB grows bigger
\
9- # chmod 777 /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice
This step seemed but soffice was installed with mode 000
and therefore could not be executed (started).
Bad idea, there are a lot of steps between 000 and 777
Don't ever use 777
It is a program you don't need write
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:33:37PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
[OpenOffice.org's new database-front-end capabilities]
I'd still like to know what, in business terms if you like, you can do
with this, that you cannot do with e.g. LAMP.
It's a weird question. There's nothing there you can't
Carl Fink wrote:
What the Access-like features of OOo 2 let one do is create and manipulate
and use databases WITHOUT SPENDING A LOT OF TIME LEARNING HOW.
Ah... you mean inefficiently and incorrectly. Got it.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 04:52:55PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
What the Access-like features of OOo 2 let one do is create and manipulate
and use databases WITHOUT SPENDING A LOT OF TIME LEARNING HOW.
Ah... you mean inefficiently and incorrectly. Got it.
Ah, you're a
--- loos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
9- # chmod 777
/opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice
This step seemed but soffice was installed
with mode 000 and therefore could not be executed
(started).
Bad idea, there are a lot of steps between 000 and
777
Don't ever use 777
It is a
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:26:50AM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
I think users need to get back to learning a little. I was asked by a
customer yesterday why Thunderbird doesn't capitalise the H in Hello
like Outlook (Word) does. I was too speechless to suggest just typing
properly.
In
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 11:11 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Andy Streich wrote:
latest and greatest of everything. What I did find surprising after
reading
this list for a while was that stable meant not only really stable but also
really slow release cycle. Okay,
Em Ter, 2005-11-15 às 16:44 -0600, Ron Johnson escreveu:
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 11:11 +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Andy Streich wrote:
latest and greatest of everything. What I did find surprising after
reading
this list for a while was that stable meant not
It's not that simple. A lot of newbies dive into testing or unstable because they "have" to have the newest stuff, then they don't know what to do when their system breaks. So it's Debian's *fault* that newbies whine when they make no effort to read the Debian web site? Gentlemen: My
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 18:25 -0800, Bruce Hohl wrote:
It's not that simple. A lot of newbies dive into testing or
unstable
because they have to have the newest stuff, then they don't know
what to do when their system breaks.
So it's Debian's *fault* that newbies whine when they make
Em Dom, 2005-11-13 às 17:19 -0500, Carl Fink escreveu:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:16:27AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
Why use a distro if you're going to have to manually install things anyway?
That might make sense if we were just installing an OS but everyone
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 01:39:07PM -0200, loos wrote:
Em Dom, 2005-11-13 ?s 17:19 -0500, Carl Fink escreveu:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 11:16:27AM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
Carl Fink wrote:
Why use a distro if you're going to have to manually install things
anyway?
That might
Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kent West wrote:
No. Stable does not get new packages, other than bug/security fixes and
the like.
And that my friends, is Debian's biggest flaw when it comes to the
desktop user. It's also why I'll never run stable
It is not a flaw. It's a designed in
On Monday 14 November 2005 09:21 am, s. keeling wrote:
Stability is what Debian was trying to produce when Murdock friends
began. That's still a cornerstone value. Considering all the
downstream distributions based on Debian, that strategy is working well.
I agree. But as a relative newbie
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 05:50:18PM -0800, Andy Streich wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2005 09:21 am, s. keeling wrote:
Stability is what Debian was trying to produce when Murdock friends
began. That's still a cornerstone value. Considering all the
downstream distributions based on Debian,
Andy Streich wrote:
latest and greatest of everything. What I did find surprising after reading
this list for a while was that stable meant not only really stable but also
really slow release cycle. Okay, that's the price you pay for really
stable.
Why be so hung up on release
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:33:00PM -0700, Scott wrote:
The latest official Debian Sarge package for Firefox is for v 1.04!
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/mozilla-firefox/
if normal Debian practices are being followed,
security fixes are backported to
Robert Brockway wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Scott wrote:
I was absolutely blown away by this:
The latest official Debian Sarge package for Firefox is for v 1.04!
http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/mozilla-firefox/
I'm rather surprised to see this. Why?
Firefox is currently
Steve Lamb wrote:
Scott wrote:
And then OpenOffice.0rg 3, Firefox 2.0, GIMP 3.0, GNOME 2.16, and KDE
4.0 will be released within the following month discouraging many from
sticking with Debian stable
You still misunderstand. The point is there is no one standing there with
a gun
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 04:55:36PM -0700, Scott wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
OpenOffice.org 2 will never be added to Debian stable. Instead, the next
time there is a stable release (Etch), OpenOffice.org 2 will be included.
And then OpenOffice.0rg 3, Firefox 2.0, GIMP 3.0,
[Discussion on Debian version numbers and backporting]
On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Scott wrote:
Perhaps, but it's also confusing to anyone coming to Debian from another
Linux distro. Let's just hope they *properly* update the user agent
string..
I say, that approach is fine, but why not show the
Scott wrote:
[snip]
What Debian (or SOMEBODY please) needs is a new stable release at
least once a year with security updates, bugfixes AND *major* software
package (i.e 1.5 to 2.0, 3.6-4.0) updates to that release as the next
release is being simultaneously developed.
Wait, there is one I
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 04:50:50PM -0700, Scott wrote:
Kent West wrote:
No. Stable does not get new packages, other than bug/security fixes
and the like.
And that my friends, is Debian's biggest flaw when it comes to the
desktop user. It's also why I'll never run stable
I think quite a
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:42:25AM -0700, Scott wrote:
Robert Brockway wrote:
It's normal for the Debian security team to backport changes into
the existing code base in Debian. Thus I expect the Firefox 1.04 to
be the vanilla source 1.04 plus backported security fixes. This is
a _good_
Original Message
Subject:Re: A few general questions from a Debian newbie
Resent-Date:Sat, 12 Nov 2005 20:40:36 -0600 (CST)
Resent-From:debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 21:22:44 -0500
From: Mark Grieveson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian
Scott wrote:
Kent West wrote:
3- OpenOffice 2 was recently added to Debian Unstable.
Is it likely that OpenOffice 2 will be added to
Debian Stable. If so when?
No. Stable does not get new packages, other than bug/security fixes and
the like.
And that my friends, is
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 01:09:10PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
Version 1 has perfectly adequate support for linking to databases.
Where you presumably mean barely usable support if you're already a
database expert? At least that's what *I* have.
In the time that you spent composing that
BTW, I think Sarge is more than just usable for desktops right now. What
I fear as a long-time Debian user is that it'll have plenty of time to
BECOME obsolete, because Etch won't be released until 2010 or something. If
Etch goes frozen by June of next year, the stable-only policy makes perfect
Antony Gelberg wrote:
Help yourself out by reading the debian-security-announce list.
That one I subbed to when I noticed it was there.
Also
available on Usenet as linux.debian.announce.security (yes, the words
are swapped which is confusing). Also read follow-ups and other
discussion on
Antony Gelberg wrote:
Scott wrote:
How about some more noise.
The full and correct URL please?
Is this perhaps what you meant?: http://www.debian.org/doc/
http://www.debian.org/releases
Thanks! I'd actually seen that before but had forgotten where. :-) It's
nice to review again. I
On 11/13/05, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Brockway wrote:
It's normal for the Debian security team to backport changes into the
existing code base in Debian. Thus I expect the Firefox 1.04 to be the
vanilla source 1.04 plus backported security fixes. This is a _good_
thing as
Carl Fink wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 01:09:10PM +, Antony Gelberg wrote:
In the time that you spent composing that post, you could have searched
the list archives and learnt how to install it. I doubt you could have
created any impressive documents in that time.
Why use a
steef [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i used 10 years ago wp5.1. never found a better
Get dosemu working, find your old wp5.1 install floppies, and you can use
wp5.1 under Linux. See:
http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/wpdos/linux.html
--
Hugh Lawson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 16:50 -0700, Scott wrote:
Kent West wrote:
3- OpenOffice 2 was recently added to Debian Unstable.
Is it likely that OpenOffice 2 will be added to
Debian Stable. If so when?
No. Stable does not get new packages, other than bug/security fixes and
the like.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:36:05AM -0700, Scott wrote:
Marc Wilson wrote:
if normal Debian practices are being followed, security fixes
are backported to stable, rather than new and untested versions being
packaged for stable.
Now that you mention it, Ubuntu used to do this the same
--- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 01:09:10PM +, Antony
Gelberg wrote:
Version 1 has perfectly adequate support for
linking to databases.
Where you presumably mean barely usable support if
you're already a database expert? At least that's
what *I*
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
