On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Today I have run a dist-upgrade and tracker wanted to get installed.
I didn't have it installed since I'm running wheezy.
Why this hard dependency? Is tracker now a requirement for those who
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you can
complain about tracker.
More than a complaint, I'd like to know why there exists such as
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you
can complain about tracker.
More than a
On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I really don’t think you
can
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Given this enormous amount of dependencies, I
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Given this enormous
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:22:21 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote:
Given
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:41:59 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
This requirement comes from upstream.
(...)
Any document to support that statement?
It will be indeed very sad to see
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:01:34 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org
wrote:
(...)
[1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/apps/3.2/3.2.2/sources/
This link was useful, thanks. I think the following's what Camaleon's
looking for:
On 14.02.2012 18:13, Camaleón wrote:
I'm not speaking about gnome-documents but gnome. I have gnome and
I don't have installed many of the listed applications.
What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like to
know.
Seriously, what is so hard to understand.
The
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:01:34 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org
wrote:
(...)
[1] http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/apps/3.2/3.2.2/sources/
This link was useful, thanks. I
On 14/02/12 11:50 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleónnoela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:41:59 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
This requirement comes from upstream.
(...)
Any
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:23:03 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 14.02.2012 18:13, Camaleón wrote:
I'm not speaking about gnome-documents but gnome. I have gnome
and I don't have installed many of the listed applications.
What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like
On 14/02/12 11:50 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 14.02.2012 17:04, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:55:28 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Camaleónnoela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:52:25 +0100,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:24:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like
to know.
It doesn't take much to check that GNOME pulls in GNOME Documents!
Oh, really?
On 14.02.2012 18:49, Tom H wrote:
Perhaps Debian's GNOME maintainers could change the dependency to a
file indexer and have users choose the indexer that strikes their
fancy (I'm assuming that there are many but I only know of Beagle -
does Google Desktop Search have a Linux version?). Someone
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 05:51:57PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Nothing, it's easy peasy. Now gnome-core seems to be the right option
for new GNOME installs because gnome metapackage is getting over
bloated and is adding new packages on-the-fly. Sigh.
No, because GNOME is what the GNOME
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:45:53 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 14/02/12 11:50 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:07:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
(...)
That said, it's a meta package. If you don't like it, don't use it.
I wish it were that simple. The metapackage has changed its
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:04:09PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Any document to support that statement?
It will be indeed very sad to see that requirement coming from GNOME ;-(
Well, er, it is part of the GNOME project…
http://projects.gnome.org/tracker/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:05:44 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:04:09PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Any document to support that statement?
It will be indeed very sad to see that requirement coming from GNOME
;-(
Well, er, it is part of the GNOME project…
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:24:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
What makes this package different (and a requirement) is what I'd like
to know.
It doesn't take
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
On 14.02.2012 18:49, Tom H wrote:
Perhaps Debian's GNOME maintainers could change the dependency to a
file indexer and have users choose the indexer that strikes their
fancy (I'm assuming that there are many but I only
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:46:10 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:24:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
What makes this package different (and a
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:46:10 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:24:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
It doesn't take much to check that GNOME pulls in GNOME
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:36:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Look at the subject and then review my first post ;-)
I knew your first post but I thought that you'd forgotten it...
He, nice try!
Believe it or not I did know that
Hello,
Today I have run a dist-upgrade and tracker wanted to get installed.
I didn't have it installed since I'm running wheezy.
Why this hard dependency? Is tracker now a requirement for those who want
a full GNOME desktop? :-?
P.S. gnome requires gnome-documents and gnome-documents requires
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Today I have run a dist-upgrade and tracker wanted to get installed.
I didn't have it installed since I'm running wheezy.
Why this hard dependency? Is tracker now a requirement for those who want
a full GNOME desktop? :-?
P.S. gnome requires
30 matches
Mail list logo
