On Friday 04 August 2006 00:22, Bill Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:11:32 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'll try it all and let you know how it works out. The
problem is that the partial burns are now useless except for scratch.
Are you using DVD-RW disks? I
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:14:15 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 02:19, David E. Fox wrote:
All I could get out of darmonizer was waiting for the first
volume and then it just stops.
I got daromizer to produce and burn one (smaller) slice. Could not
coax
On Thursday 03 August 2006 23:37, Bill Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:14:15 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 02:19, David E. Fox wrote:
All I could get out of darmonizer was waiting for the first
volume and then it just stops.
I got
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:11:32 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I'll try it all and let you know how it works out. The
problem is that the partial burns are now useless except for scratch.
Are you using DVD-RW disks? I did have a problem with daromizer
the first time I used it
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:38:05 -0600
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Requirement: Single touch, full-backup? Faster speeds in case
interation is required?
Well, that would be nice. :)
In the old days when my biggest disk was 1.6 gig, I got a DAT tape
drive precisely for easy backup - and
On Jul 1, 2006, at 11:52 PM, David E. Fox wrote:
[Long discourse on backups and how they were done ten years ago.]
2. External hard disks are slightly less portable than DVD's.
3. External hard disks *might* take up slightly more phhysical space
over DVD's, depending on the size/density of
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 10:54:10PM -0700, David E. Fox wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:20:48 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DVD's are more likely to survive EMP. Relevant if your data have to
survive a nuclear war if you do.
Ironic, given the fact that I've written many DDV-RWs that
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:54:49AM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
On Jul 1, 2006, at 11:52 PM, David E. Fox wrote:
[Long discourse on backups and how they were done ten years ago.]
2. External hard disks are slightly less portable than DVD's.
3. External hard disks *might* take up slightly
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 00:54:49 -0600
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plug in a USB drive, rsync, unplug it and store is somewhere safe.
Done.
Anything else is a waste of time, which is the most precious thing
you have. People with nothing better to do mess around with
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 07:20:48 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DVD's are more likely to survive EMP. Relevant if your data have to
survive a nuclear war if you do.
Ironic, given the fact that I've written many DDV-RWs that have proved
later (in maybe a few months) to have developed scads of bad
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:38:05PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
Some requirements that might push someone back toward removable media
instead of disk are:
DVD's are more likely to survive EMP. Relevant if your data have to
survive a nuclear war if you do.
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 21:52, Bill Thompson wrote:
The other script (darmonizer) defaults its size to the full 4 gigs.
All I could get out of darmonizer was waiting for the first volume
and then it just stops.
I have been having this problem as well. If you take a look at your
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 02:19, David E. Fox wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:44:00 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other script (darmonizer) defaults its size to the full 4 gigs.
All I could get out of darmonizer was waiting for the first volume
and then it just stops.
dar
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:14:15 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 02:19, David E. Fox wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:44:00 +0300
snip
Incrementals are still going to take some time provided one has to
load the backup media onto the system before proceeding,
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:19:36 -0700
David E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:44:00 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other script (darmonizer) defaults its size to the full 4 gigs.
All I could get out of darmonizer was waiting for the first volume
and
David E. Fox wrote:
Let's apply a little engineering here:
If I restate your concerns as requirements, what do we come up with?
Dar seems to be able to do the job (i.e., backup) well enough, although
it is a bit clunky. But it does it better than mindi/mondo at a
reasonable compression rate,
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:44:00 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other script (darmonizer) defaults its size to the full 4 gigs.
All I could get out of darmonizer was waiting for the first volume
and then it just stops.
dar itself seems to work - I used it over the weekend to back
Daniel Johnson wrote:
Trying it out now with a noburn option with a .dar file size limit.
See if
this works. Am I correct to assume that it will fill the first one,
burn it
while filling the next one, remove it after burning/verifying and
continue
until done/disk is full?
I had never
Daniel Johnson wrote:
Trying it out now with a noburn option with a .dar file size limit.
See if
this works. Am I correct to assume that it will fill the first one,
burn it
while filling the next one, remove it after burning/verifying and
continue
until done/disk is full?
I had never
On Saturday 17 June 2006 01:16, Daniel Johnson wrote:
Trying it out now with a noburn option with a .dar file size limit. See
if this works. Am I correct to assume that it will fill the first one,
burn it while filling the next one, remove it after burning/verifying and
continue until
Trying it out now with a noburn option with a .dar file size limit. See if
this works. Am I correct to assume that it will fill the first one, burn it
while filling the next one, remove it after burning/verifying and continue
until done/disk is full?
I had never thought of burning the DVD
On Thursday 15 June 2006 03:57, Daniel Johnson wrote:
On 5/1/06, Mark Grieveson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use DAR and a script called DARomizer which is designed to backup a
hard drive to multi DVD-RW disks.
DAR:
http://dar.linux.free.fr/
DARomizer:
On 5/1/06, Mark Grieveson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use DAR and a script called DARomizer which is designed to backup a
hard drive to multi DVD-RW disks.
DAR:
http://dar.linux.free.fr/
DARomizer:
http://www.catherders.com/tiki-list_file_gallery.php?galleryId=1
Thanks, that sounds great. I
On Monday 01 May 2006 22:31, Bill Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:32:13 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This medium makes it practical.
Which tools are best and simplest for this?
I use DAR and a script called DARomizer which is designed to backup a
hard drive to
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 15:32:13 +0300
David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This medium makes it practical.
Which tools are best and simplest for this?
I use DAR and a script called DARomizer which is designed to backup a
hard drive to multi DVD-RW disks.
DAR:
http://dar.linux.free.fr/
I use DAR and a script called DARomizer which is designed to backup a
hard drive to multi DVD-RW disks.
DAR:
http://dar.linux.free.fr/
DARomizer:
http://www.catherders.com/tiki-list_file_gallery.php?galleryId=1
Thanks, that sounds great. I notice too that dar is packaged in the
This medium makes it practical.
Which tools are best and simplest for this?
(I do not like partimage because it insists on identical sizes for restoring
and this might not be the case as I have learned in moving my partitions
around.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
David Baron wrote:
This medium makes it practical.
Which tools are best and simplest for this?
(I do not like partimage because it insists on identical sizes for restoring
and this might not be the case as I have learned in moving my partitions
around.)
Personally, I prefer
David Baron wrote:
This medium makes it practical.
Which tools are best and simplest for this?
(I do not like partimage because it insists on identical sizes for restoring
and this might not be the case as I have learned in moving my partitions
around.)
Not so AFAIK: just the partition
29 matches
Mail list logo
