On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:59:33 -0400, Celejar posted:
[...edit just to save bandwidth]
But this equivalence between insecure systems and those likely to fall
victim to an accidental rm -rf / breaks down for the above case, since
accidents become much less likely, but a virus can still do
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:09:13 +, Avi Greenbury posted:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Virus#Threats
Good grief, since when has wikipedia become the ultimate resource. Do you
notice how many of the references are to anti-virus labs, who have a
vested interest in selling software?
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:57:50 +0800, 明覺 posted:
you are right, it should not be a viruses, maybe it's because my harddisk
is broken, how to check my harddisk? now I have installed a new system on
it and it is working fine now, but I'm afraid it will be broken suddenly
again after a few days,
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:58:13 -0700
Thorny thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Naturally any of this is opinion on both sides. It isn't really possible
for me to give data that shows something doesn't exist. And, you have
no reason to believe me or anyone else but will you please review this
[T] A simple answer is that Linux virus exist as a proof-of-concept,
there
aren't any in the wild. If you think about it, there isn't a
mechanism for propagation. You don't run as root do you? You can find
out lots more about the concept with your favourite search engine.
[C] While they
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:37:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. posted:
While they have been seen in the wild, ...
Please cite examples and/or documentation so I may learn. I know from your
other posts that you give good advice but I am not willing to accept this
statement on that basis.
--
To
Thorny wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:37:56 -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. posted:
While they have been seen in the wild, ...
Please cite examples and/or documentation so I may learn. I know from your
other posts that you give good advice but I am not willing to accept this
statement on that
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:51:53 -0700
Thorny thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:
[T] A simple answer is that Linux virus exist as a proof-of-concept,
there
aren't any in the wild. If you think about it, there isn't a
mechanism for propagation. You don't run as root do you? You can find
out
On Jueves 19 Marzo 2009 01:01:04 明覺 escribió:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago, and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem. then i restarted my
machine, it ccould not shutdown for it said it's a readonly file system.
then i pressed reset to force
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:01 PM, 明覺 shi.min...@gmail.com wrote:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago, and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem. then i restarted my
I had a box that would frequently not be able to find its boot disks,
got error 17s
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago, and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem. then i restarted my
machine, it ccould not shutdown for it said it's a readonly file system.
then i pressed reset to force it restart, then it stopped at grup
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Thorny thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago,
and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem. then i restarted my
machine, it ccould not shutdown for it said it's a readonly file system.
[...]
If it's not a virus, why my computer suddenly become broken, I do not
understand, i guess it should be a virus.
A simple answer is that Linux virus exist as a proof-of-concept, there
aren't any in the wild. If you think about it, there isn't a mechanism
for propagation. You don't run as
明覺:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago, and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem.
What's in /var/log/syslog?
then i restarted my
machine, it ccould not shutdown for it said it's a readonly file system.
then i pressed reset to force it
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 16:42:07 +0800, 明覺 (shi.min...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Thorny thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago,
and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem. then i
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:50:29 -0700
Thorny thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:
...
A simple answer is that Linux virus exist as a proof-of-concept, there
aren't any in the wild. If you think about it, there isn't a mechanism
for propagation. You don't run as root do you? You can find out lots more
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
明覺:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago, and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem.
What's in /var/log/syslog?
I installed a new system in another partition, and use
In 6a8fced30903190142s7a96df91y4dbfcfc0649f1...@mail.gmail.com, 明覺 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Thorny thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago,
and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem. then i restarted
my
In 6a8fced30903190657k188d6c39nfbcbbd12a284a...@mail.gmail.com, 明覺 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
明覺:
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago,
and when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem.
then i
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:57:50PM +0800, ?...@k4 wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Jochen Schulz m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
First: today's viruses generally don't destroy their hosts anymore.
Instead, they use their host as a platform for criminal behaviour. You
don't earn any
It all happened suddenly. I was editing a file in gedit 3 minutes ago, and
when I was saving it, it said readonly filesystem. then i restarted my
machine, it ccould not shutdown for it said it's a readonly file system.
then i pressed reset to force it restart, then it stopped at grup loading.
21 matches
Mail list logo
