Are the boot scripts different? In different locations?
Are directories in different places and named differently?
Are people working on a standard linux.
Edward Ing
Edward Ing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote...
Are the boot scripts different? In different locations?
Somewhat, yes. Redhat has everything in /etc/rc.d/ and Debian puts
them directly in /etc. eg RH's /etc/rc.d/init.d/ is Deb's
/etc/init.d/. And Debian has no equivalent of /etc/rc.d/rc.local.
One of
Edward Ing wrote:
Are the boot scripts different? In different locations?
In general, the scripts located in /etc/rc.d/init.d on Redhat are
in /etc/init.d on Debian. Both are sysv-based, so there is not
a radical difference like you will find with BSD-based systems like
Stampede or
with redhat, but I am wondering how
different Debian is?
Edward Ing wrote:
Are the boot scripts different? In different locations?
In general, the scripts located in /etc/rc.d/init.d on Redhat are
in /etc/init.d on Debian. Both are sysv-based, so there is not
a radical difference like you will find
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Nov 1998, Gossamer wrote:
Edward Ing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote...
And Debian has no equivalent of /etc/rc.d/rc.local.
That's not completely true. Debian has an /etc/rcS.d/ which is a general
equivalent to rc.local. That's how I get a few
Edward Ing wrote:
Where can I find the FSSTD, and FHS standard?
And what do they stand for?
ftp://tsx-11.mit.edu/pub/linux/docs/linux-standards/fsstnd/
look in the 'old' directory for fsstd, while the fhs is current.
I believe they stand for File Heirarchy Standard and fsstd
is just a bad
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Kovacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward Ing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote...
And Debian has no equivalent of /etc/rc.d/rc.local.
That's not completely true. Debian has an /etc/rcS.d/ which is a general
equivalent to rc.local.
No, it is something COMPLETELY
7 matches
Mail list logo
