-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 9 Oct 1999, esoR ocsirF wrote:
> I just installed a potato box via the usuall minimal slink then point
> apt at potato scenario. I experienced the same problem reported in this
> thread, namely no name resolution but IP worked just fine.
>
> I finally w
Greetings all,
I just installed a potato box via the usuall minimal slink then point
apt at potato scenario. I experienced the same problem reported in this
thread, namely no name resolution but IP worked just fine.
I finally was able to fix it by changing /etc/init.d/network
the gateway was left
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
> For what it's worth: I installed the 2.2.12 kernel on my working slink
> installation (which has never had the problem), rebooted, and promptly
> saw name resolution hang. I restored the 2.0.36 kernel, and
> everything worked again.
Also, for what it's worth, I am running a 2.2.12-3 kernel on my dialup
potato box and name resolution works fine.
-Todd
At 11:58 AM 10/7/1999 -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
For what it's worth: I installed the 2.2.12 kernel on my working slink
installation (which has never had the problem), reb
For what it's worth: I installed the 2.2.12 kernel on my working slink
installation (which has never had the problem), rebooted, and promptly
saw name resolution hang. I restored the 2.0.36 kernel, and
everything worked again.
Since name resolution works with 2.0.36, your /etc/resolv.conf is
probably fine.
Can you ping or traceroute -n to your DNS successfully with 2.2.12 (use
the ip address you have in resolv.conf)?
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 09:23:47AM -0700, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
>
> Last month I had a problem: in sho
Last month I had a problem: in short, I installed potato, and noticed
that name resolution hung, although things worked fine if I used a
numeric IP address.
I've included below the plea for help that I sent last month. It
describes the problem in detail.
Well, in case anyone's interested, I hav
7 matches
Mail list logo
