Am 2008-07-18 12:04:35, schrieb Steve C. Lamb:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:01:31PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I do not believe it, since I am admin a Courier-Imap Server with 73.000
users ith 2.8 million legitim messages and 8 million spams per day.
And a d-u troll.
I would
Am 2008-07-13 14:06:51, schrieb Steve Lamb:
My apologies to Ron, I slapped reply and not reply-to-all and trim. :(
Ron Johnson wrote:
That's qmail's fault, not that of Maildir.
No, that is a design problem in Maildir. Granted I wouldn't want my MTAs
I do not believe it, since I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 04:01:31PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I do not believe it, since I am admin a Courier-Imap Server with 73.000
users ith 2.8 million legitim messages and 8 million spams per day.
And a d-u troll.
I would never use mbox for such stuff... and of course, a
Ron Johnson wrote:
Maybe it's because I keep d-u messages is semi-annual history
folders so directories never get above 10,000 files, but what
problems do Maildirs have?
Needing to open many files instead of one?
Needing to deal with that many files in any capacity, ever. I've
had the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/13/08 04:14, Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Maybe it's because I keep d-u messages is semi-annual history
folders so directories never get above 10,000 files, but what
problems do Maildirs have?
Needing to open many files instead of
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 08:31:06PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/10/08 12:38, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/09/08 13:26, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
try a different MUA?
This is why IMAP should be the standard
My apologies to Ron, I slapped reply and not reply-to-all and trim. :(
Ron Johnson wrote:
That's qmail's fault, not that of Maildir.
No, that is a design problem in Maildir. Granted I wouldn't want my MTAs
using a flat file for all its traffic, it makes no sense there for how short
On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:38:21AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/09/08 13:26, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
This is why IMAP should be the standard mail store, not
Nate Duehr wrote:
We really gotta get you over to Maildir someday, Steve. ;-)
Then you can back up mail directories with thinks like rdiff and not
pull in the whole mbox file into the backup again. Just the new
mail. (GRIN)
While I do think Maildir is a lot better than mbox, applications
Nate Duehr wrote:
We really gotta get you over to Maildir someday, Steve. ;-)
Uh, no, thanks. I far prefer mbox's problems to maildir's.
Then you can back up mail directories with thinks like rdiff and not
pull in the whole mbox file into the backup again. Just the new mail.
(GRIN)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/08 18:46, Steve Lamb wrote:
Nate Duehr wrote:
We really gotta get you over to Maildir someday, Steve. ;-)
Uh, no, thanks. I far prefer mbox's problems to maildir's.
Maybe it's because I keep d-u messages is semi-annual history
Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Of course, it drops mails directly into Maildir folders, so you'd
have to tell Dovcot to use Maildir instead of mbox. But that should
not be hard.
I was talking about the filters from the client more than the subfolders.
Dovecot doesn't do sieve.
Wackojacko wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Dovecot doesn't do sieve.
There is a plug-in for sieve.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Sieve
HTH
Hell yeah it helps. Hm, they're compiled in by default in Ubuntu, wonder
if that means Debian too. Also...
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/09/08 13:26, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
try a different MUA?
This is why IMAP should be the standard mail store, not mboxes in
proprietary locations.
second that. THe convenience is incredible. Case in point:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:38:21AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/09/08 13:26, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
This is why IMAP should be the standard mail store, not mboxes in
proprietary locations.
second that. THe
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 01:51:01PM -0400, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
The only thing I miss in that setup, really, is the ability to configure
filters from inside the client and subfolders. I know both are possible if
I switch to another IMAP server. However I would lose the flexibility of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/08 12:51, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
[snip]
The only thing I miss in that setup, really, is the ability to configure
filters from inside the client and subfolders. I know both are possible if I
switch to another IMAP server. However I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/08 12:38, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:38:35PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 07/09/08 13:26, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
try a different MUA?
This is why IMAP should be the standard mail store, not
Ron Johnson wrote:
Of course, it drops mails directly into Maildir folders, so you'd
have to tell Dovcot to use Maildir instead of mbox. But that should
not be hard.
I was talking about the filters from the client more than the subfolders.
Dovecot doesn't do sieve.
signature.asc
19 matches
Mail list logo
