On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 06:07:33PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
I'm loking for shared folders so I can offer global spam/ham folders
for my users. I know this is generally a nono but in this instance I am
willing to run with it given two facts. The first is that spam scanning
happens
Dave Carrigan wrote:
Maybe you need no re-think the requirement to scan at SMTP time. I also
prefer that, but statistical scanning is so much more powerful than
anything else that I finally gave up on SMTP scanning and moved to
delivery-agent scanning, just so I could use statistical methods.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:03:47AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
It also relies on the person knowing how to forward in
a particular format.
The scanner I use (DSPAM) doesn't care about the format. It uses a
special tag in the body or in the headers, and uses that tag to
re-calculate the false
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:03:47AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Dave Carrigan wrote:
showstopper. Cyrus 2.1 works just fine with Squirrelmail, and it
supports shared folders with full ACLs. Plus, after you move your mbox
messages into the Cyrus message store, they're available from anywhere.
CW Harris wrote:
mutt *can* access IMAP servers if that's what you mean.
Mutt isn't the only client that people can use.
sarcasm
I so love people who think that the entire Unix world uses procmail to
filter mail, mutt to read mail, etc, etc, etc. while the whole time pointing
out one of
Dave Carrigan wrote:
As for putting extra headers into a message, I'm not sure why you think
this is a problem. That's what headers are for -- to convey
meta-information about a message.
Because forwarded messages are not the same as the original message. If
the person forwards it as a MIME
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 11:22:47AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Dave Carrigan wrote:
As for putting extra headers into a message, I'm not sure why you think
this is a problem. That's what headers are for -- to convey
meta-information about a message.
Because forwarded messages are not the
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 11:09:05AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
CW Harris wrote:
mutt *can* access IMAP servers if that's what you mean.
Mutt isn't the only client that people can use.
I guess I just completely misunderstood you. I thought you were
questioning if the IMAP mail was available
Dave Carrigan wrote:
Which is 100% true based on your initial assumptions.
Uhm, no. It is 100% correct based on what I know.
However, if your initial assumptions are false, then this is also false.
Your initial assumption is false.
No, your assuption is false. Where was it ever said
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sarcasm
I so love people who think that the entire Unix world uses
procmail to filter mail, mutt to read mail, etc, etc, etc. while the
whole time pointing out one of the defining features is how flexible
Currently I am running uw-imapd. I believe it is the version from Woody
even though most of my system is riding unstable. While it works well enough
I am not pleased with the capabilities it presents. I'm looking for a
replacement which can do the following:
a: Operate well with
Although I have not been in this situation, I have heard good stuff
about dovecot (http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/). You might want to see if
it fits your needs.
Steve Lamb wrote:
Currently I am running uw-imapd. I believe it is the version from
Woody even though most of my system is
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Steve Lamb wrote:
Currently I am running uw-imapd. I believe it is the version from
Woody even though most of my system is riding unstable. While it works
well enough I am not pleased with the capabilities it presents. I'm
looking for a replacement which can do
Finally mbox is a requirement because my Squirrelmail isers, as well
as myself on Thunderbird, have months of archived mail in mbox format.
Converting mbox files to maildir folders is nearly trivial to script.
http://home.uninet.ee/~ragnar/2md/
14 matches
Mail list logo
