Hi,
Does anyone knows whether or not evolution (in squeeze) support
inline PGP signing ? I do need inline signing for a robot that only
support inline PGP.
Thanks
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:10:39 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Does anyone knows whether or not evolution (in squeeze) support
inline PGP signing ? I do need inline signing for a robot that only
support inline PGP.
By reading this FAQ:
On Ma, 31 mai 11, 13:03:42, Camaleón wrote:
It looks like only outline PGP signing is fully supported, but sounds a
bit strange that nowadays this cannot be changed in the MUA.
Probably because inline is deprecated for years ;)
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and
On Tue, 31 May 2011 19:53:56 +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Ma, 31 mai 11, 13:03:42, Camaleón wrote:
It looks like only outline PGP signing is fully supported, but sounds a
bit strange that nowadays this cannot be changed in the MUA.
Probably because inline is deprecated for years ;)
On Ma, 31 mai 11, 17:18:43, Camaleón wrote:
P.S. IIRC Mutt allows to use both styles, and IMO that's what a good MUA
does, giving options to users.
I agree, but I would still avoid if if at all possible, since I doubt it
gets too much testing lately.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic
5 matches
Mail list logo