Bruno Buys wrote:
> Basajaun wrote:
[snip]
> >Yes, the 2.4 does fine. Since SATA is seen as IDE by 2.4, the ide-*
> >modules are loaded, then the IDE devices are seen. The problem under
> >2.6 is to have some SCSI modules loaded _first_, so they get hold of
> >the ide[01] channels, and actual IDE
Basajaun wrote:
Michael Gregg wrote:
1) Debian can not be installed on a SATA HD from scratch with a 2.6
kernel. Rather, one has to install with kernel 2.4, _then_ upgrade the
kernel. This is so because, under 2.6, SATA is seen as SCSI, and
somehow this makes the install program not see the
Michael Gregg wrote:
> > >>1) Debian can not be installed on a SATA HD from scratch with a 2.6
> > >>kernel. Rather, one has to install with kernel 2.4, _then_ upgrade the
> > >>kernel. This is so because, under 2.6, SATA is seen as SCSI, and
> > >>somehow this makes the install program not see the
> >>1) Debian can not be installed on a SATA HD from scratch with a 2.6
> >>kernel. Rather, one has to install with kernel 2.4, _then_ upgrade the
> >>kernel. This is so because, under 2.6, SATA is seen as SCSI, and
> >>somehow this makes the install program not see the IDE CD drive it is
> >>bein
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 08:12 -0700, Basajaun wrote:
marc wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
[snip]
[snip]
[snip]
[snip]
1) Debian can not be installed on a SATA HD from scratch with a 2.6
kernel. Rather, one has to install with kernel 2.4, _then_ u
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 08:12 -0700, Basajaun wrote:
> marc wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
[snip]
>
> [snip]
>
[snip]
>
> [snip]
>
[snip]
>
> 1) Debian can not be installed on a SATA HD from scratch with a 2.6
> kernel. Rather, one has to install with kernel 2.4, _then_ upgrade the
> kernel. This is so
6 matches
Mail list logo
