Richard Owlett writes:
> I wish to try some beta software which assumes python3.7 is
> installed. I have Debian 9.8 installed on a machine dedicated to this
> exercise. I did a web search and got a half dozen on topic hits. There
> were enough differences that I wasn't sure if I was missing
was missing something important. The
> last time I compiled something was on a PDP 11/45 in approximately 1975.
>
> Suggestions?
> TIA
Try the pip python repositories
https://docs.python.org/3/installing/index.html#install-pip-in-versions-of-python-prior-to-python-3-4
I recall I used i
On 4/26/19, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:42:04 -0500
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>> I wish to try some beta software which assumes python3.7 is
>> installed. I have Debian 9.8 installed on a machine dedicated to this
>> exercise. I did a web search and got a half dozen on topic hits.
>>
On 26/04/2019 18:42, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I wish to try some beta software which assumes python3.7 is installed.
> I have Debian 9.8 installed on a machine dedicated to this exercise. I
> did a web search and got a half dozen on topic hits. There were enough
> differences that I wasn't sure
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:42:04 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I wish to try some beta software which assumes python3.7 is
> installed. I have Debian 9.8 installed on a machine dedicated to this
> exercise. I did a web search and got a half dozen on topic hits.
> There were enough differences that I
On Fri 26 Apr 2019 at 12:42:04 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I wish to try some beta software
Very informative.
> which assumes python3.7 is installed. I
> have Debian 9.8 installed on a machine dedicated to this exercise. I did a
> web search
For what?
>
I wish to try some beta software which assumes python3.7 is installed. I
have Debian 9.8 installed on a machine dedicated to this exercise. I did
a web search and got a half dozen on topic hits. There were enough
differences that I wasn't sure if I was missing something important. The
last
Hi.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 01:21:36PM +0300, Mimiko wrote:
> On 01.04.2019 09:40, Matthew Crews wrote:
> > On 3/31/19 11:20 PM, Mimiko wrote:
> > > On 01.04.2019 05:51, Matthew Crews wrote:
> > > > Step-by-step instructions are found here:
> > > >
> > > >
On 01.04.2019 09:40, Matthew Crews wrote:
On 3/31/19 11:20 PM, Mimiko wrote:
On 01.04.2019 05:51, Matthew Crews wrote:
Step-by-step instructions are found here:
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/Debian-Stretch-Root-on-ZFS
Hello.
I read this guide, but this implies to have a separate MD
On 3/31/19 11:20 PM, Mimiko wrote:
> On 01.04.2019 05:51, Matthew Crews wrote:
>> Step-by-step instructions are found here:
>>
>> https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/Debian-Stretch-Root-on-ZFS
>
> Hello.
>
> I read this guide, but this implies to have a separate MD raid on disk.
> It is not
On 01.04.2019 05:51, Matthew Crews wrote:
Step-by-step instructions are found here:
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/Debian-Stretch-Root-on-ZFS
Hello.
I read this guide, but this implies to have a separate MD raid on disk. It is
not fully /boot on ZFS.
On 3/31/19 3:12 PM, David Christensen wrote:
> On 3/31/19 12:45 AM, Mimiko wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I know that ZFS is not well supported as MD raids. All I've found on
>> internet on installing Debian on ZFS is using a live disk.
>>
>> My goal is to boot from
On 3/31/19 12:45 AM, Mimiko wrote:
Hello.
I know that ZFS is not well supported as MD raids. All I've found on
internet on installing Debian on ZFS is using a live disk.
My goal is to boot from network and install Debian root on ZFS raid
mirror. I can do this using MD raid. I am searching
Hello.
I know that ZFS is not well supported as MD raids. All I've found on internet
on installing Debian on ZFS is using a live disk.
My goal is to boot from network and install Debian root on ZFS raid mirror. I can do this using MD raid. I am searching for suggestions of how to
enable ZFS
I have installed Stretch on an SSD, with uefi, without any trouble.
Me, as well (9.8).
Here's one thing to watch out for.
Unlike Ubuntu, MInt, etc, debian will not install non-free drivers by
default.
In the virtualbox scenario you had before, VB does an excellent of
emulating the
On 03/12/2019 05:44 AM, Joe wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:20:31 +0330
"Iman P." wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam
First thanks for your time.
I have an Acer laptop (Aspire E1, x64, amd i7, ram 16, vga 2).
My base tasks are using virtual machines.
I use dual boot for Win10 & Debian 8.6 & the type of
Iman P. wrote:
> I use dual boot for Win10 & Debian 8.6 & the type of Bios boot is “Legacy”.
>
> I gonna change my HDD to SSD & install just Debian 9.8 (so need at least
> two primary partitions).
>
> My mainboard supports both legacy & uefi mode.
>
> I know uefi mode just run on GPT not MBR.
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:20:31 +0330
"Iman P." wrote:
> Dear Sir/Madam
>
> First thanks for your time.
>
> I have an Acer laptop (Aspire E1, x64, amd i7, ram 16, vga 2).
>
> My base tasks are using virtual machines.
>
> I use dual boot for Win10 & Debian 8.6 & the type of Bios boot is
>
Dear Sir/Madam
First thanks for your time.
I have an Acer laptop (Aspire E1, x64, amd i7, ram 16, vga 2).
My base tasks are using virtual machines.
I use dual boot for Win10 & Debian 8.6 & the type of Bios boot is “Legacy”.
I gonna change my HDD to SSD & install just Debian 9.8 (so need at
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:10:45 +
Brian wrote:
On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 13:52:02 -0500, deb wrote:
Simplified query:
After installing Debian 9.7, without Networking, and without an Ethernet
connection,
how does one go about installing Intel Wireless (with the non-free bits
available
t; > > On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 13:52:02 -0500, deb wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Simplified query:
> > > > >
> > > > > After installing Debian 9.7, without Networking, and without an
> > > > > Ethernet
> > > > &g
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:24:40 +
Brian wrote:
> On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 14:50:29 -0500, Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:10:45 +
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 13:52:02 -0500, deb wrote:
> > >
> > > > Simp
On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 14:50:29 -0500, Celejar wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:10:45 +
> Brian wrote:
>
> > On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 13:52:02 -0500, deb wrote:
> >
> > > Simplified query:
> > >
> > > After installing Debian 9.7, without Netw
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:10:45 +
Brian wrote:
> On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 13:52:02 -0500, deb wrote:
>
> > Simplified query:
> >
> > After installing Debian 9.7, without Networking, and without an Ethernet
> > connection,
> >
> > how does one go abo
deb wrote:
> Simplified query:
>
> After installing Debian 9.7, without Networking, and without an Ethernet
> connection,
>
> how does one go about installing Intel Wireless (with the non-free bits
> available on a USB drive)?
>
Assuming the USB disk is /dev/sdb
On Fri 22 Feb 2019 at 13:52:02 -0500, deb wrote:
> Simplified query:
>
> After installing Debian 9.7, without Networking, and without an Ethernet
> connection,
>
> how does one go about installing Intel Wireless (with the non-free bits
> available on a USB drive)?
Firmw
Simplified query:
After installing Debian 9.7, without Networking, and without an Ethernet
connection,
how does one go about installing Intel Wireless (with the non-free bits
available on a USB drive)?
Thanks
On 2/21/2019 7:21 PM, deb wrote:
On 2/21/2019 7:12 PM, deb wrote:
So, I
On 2/21/2019 7:12 PM, deb wrote:
So, I punched on to install Debian 9.7 onto the Intel NUC
(https://www.provantage.com/intel-boxnuc7i7bnh~7ITSP1CM.htm)
bypassing the wireless part, as I was still stuck on it asking for
iwlwifi-8265-26.ucode, iwlwifi-8265-25.ucode, iwlwifi-8265-24.ucode,
So, I punched on to install Debian 9.7 onto the Intel NUC
(https://www.provantage.com/intel-boxnuc7i7bnh~7ITSP1CM.htm)
bypassing the wireless part, as I was still stuck on it asking for
iwlwifi-8265-26.ucode, iwlwifi-8265-25.ucode, iwlwifi-8265-24.ucode,
iwlwifi-8265-23.ucode
in the
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:12:00PM +0100, deloptes wrote:
> James H. H. Lampert wrote:
>
> >> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >> openjdk-8-jdk : Depends: openjdk-8-jre (= 8u171-b11-1~bpo8+1) but it is
> >> not going to be installed Depends: openjdk-8-jdk-headless (=
> >>
James H. H. Lampert wrote:
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> openjdk-8-jdk : Depends: openjdk-8-jre (= 8u171-b11-1~bpo8+1) but it is
>> not going to be installed Depends: openjdk-8-jdk-headless (=
>> 8u171-b11-1~bpo8+1) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to
>>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:16:25AM -0800, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> I'm endeavoring to get Java 8 onto our development instance, so that the
> Tomcat environment there matches that of our cluster nodes, and apg-get is
> not cooperating.
>
> This particular instance is a Bitnami SVN/Trac
I'm endeavoring to get Java 8 onto our development instance, so that the
Tomcat environment there matches that of our cluster nodes, and apg-get
is not cooperating.
This particular instance is a Bitnami SVN/Trac server, with Tomcat 8
added to it, and running independently of the Apache server
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:38:39AM +, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My upgraded Jessie machines still have the at command installed by default,
> my new Stretch machines do not have it.
> I just wanted to install at and noticed it has A LOT of required parts that I
> do not understand. Why
Hi,
My upgraded Jessie machines still have the at command installed by default, my
new Stretch machines do not have it.
I just wanted to install at and noticed it has A LOT of required parts that I
do not understand. Why does it want to install 19 packages like exim4-base and
mysql-common?
Is
On Fri, 09 Nov 2018 13:10:38 +0100
floris wrote:
> Gregory Sharp schreef op 2018-11-08 19:01:
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1) Why should xorg be uninstalled when nvidia-driver is installed?
> >
> > 2) What might be a recommended upgrade path for me?
>
> From bug 903770 [1]:
>
> ... the
to CUDA 9 in backport, I learned that
installing
nvidia-driver (either version: 384.130 or 390.87) would uninstall xorg,
gdm3,
libreoffice, and many other seemingly useful packages.
Questions:
1) Why should xorg be uninstalled when nvidia-driver is installed?
2) What might be a recommended
On 11/7/2018 2:58 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 02:27:32PM +0100, john doe wrote:
>> On 11/7/2018 7:26 AM, Reco wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:44:08PM +0100, john doe wrote:
On 11/6/2018 5:05 PM, john doe wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 4:02 PM,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:01:26 -0500
Gregory Sharp wrote:
Hello Gregory,
>1) Why should xorg be uninstalled when nvidia-driver is installed?
Doesn't want to remove xorg here. As nvidia-driver is a metapackage,
it's not entirely necessary to install it in any case.
--
Regards _
/ )
that installing
nvidia-driver (either version: 384.130 or 390.87) would uninstall xorg, gdm3,
libreoffice, and many other seemingly useful packages.
Questions:
1) Why should xorg be uninstalled when nvidia-driver is installed?
2) What might be a recommended upgrade path for me?
Hi.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 02:27:32PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> On 11/7/2018 7:26 AM, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:44:08PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> >> On 11/6/2018 5:05 PM, john doe wrote:
> >>> On 11/6/2018 4:02 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On
On 11/7/2018 7:26 AM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:44:08PM +0100, john doe wrote:
>> On 11/6/2018 5:05 PM, john doe wrote:
>>> On 11/6/2018 4:02 PM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:04:25PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm
Hi.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:44:08PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 5:05 PM, john doe wrote:
> > On 11/6/2018 4:02 PM, Reco wrote:
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:04:25PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm trying to install Debian Stretch using a
On 11/6/2018 5:05 PM, john doe wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 4:02 PM, Reco wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:04:25PM +0100, john doe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to install Debian Stretch using a preseeding file.
>>> All of this is with Qemu and I'm not sure how to pass the path
On 11/6/2018 4:02 PM, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:04:25PM +0100, john doe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to install Debian Stretch using a preseeding file.
>> All of this is with Qemu and I'm not sure how to pass the path of the
>> preseed file:
>>
>>
Hi.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 03:04:25PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install Debian Stretch using a preseeding file.
> All of this is with Qemu and I'm not sure how to pass the path of the
> preseed file:
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 -drive file=debian.img,format=raw -cdrom
Hi,
I'm trying to install Debian Stretch using a preseeding file.
All of this is with Qemu and I'm not sure how to pass the path of the
preseed file:
qemu-system-x86_64 -drive file=debian.img,format=raw -cdrom
debian-9.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso -boot d -nographic -kernel vmlinuz
-append
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:04:29PM +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote:
I have got Debian stable and I'm trying to install new versions of
debhelper and lintian from backports. However, apt-get claims that the
packages are already the newest versions and installs nothing. Command
"apt-get show"
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 04:04:29PM +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote:
> How can I
> install the new packages from backports?
https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/
Hi
I have got Debian stable and I'm trying to install new versions of
debhelper and lintian from backports. However, apt-get claims that the
packages are already the newest versions and installs nothing. Command
"apt-get show" shows the new versions (from backports) of the packages,
too. How
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 06:29:27PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> I'm posting this here because the problem seems to be with the package
> rather than with Samba. When I run apt install samba I get
>
(SNIP)
> Job for smbd.service failed because the control process exited with error
> code.
> See
I'm posting this here because the problem seems to be with the package
rather than with Samba. When I run apt install samba I get
root@TheLibrarian:~# apt install samba
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following additional packages
On Sun 14 Oct 2018 at 21:50:22 +0530, Veek M wrote:
> How do you disable the 'Detect and Mount CD-ROM' when preseeding via
> grub cmdline.
>
> I do:
> loopback loop0 (hd0,3)/files/debian_9.5-amd64-DVD-1.iso
> linux (loop0)/install.amd/vmlinuz locale=en_GB.UTF-8 etc...
> initrd
How do you disable the 'Detect and Mount CD-ROM' when preseeding via
grub cmdline.
I do:
loopback loop0 (hd0,3)/files/debian_9.5-amd64-DVD-1.iso
linux (loop0)/install.amd/vmlinuz locale=en_GB.UTF-8 etc...
initrd (loop0)/install.amd/initrd.gz
after pressing 'c' in GRUB
I get the very annoying
ver*
> > *Reading package lists... Done*
> > *Building dependency tree *
> > *Reading state information... Done*
>
> Here's what I get from similar command, why are you installing pkg with a
> wildcard on the end? Are you using bash, or some other shell?
>
> #
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:18:32 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan said:
> Latest update is.
> When i even wget on the same linux server i get forbidden message 403.
> [image: image.png]
> however on same network on windows platform i can easily open the same path
> and download the file on windows.
So you
Latest update is.
When i even wget on the same linux server i get forbidden message 403.
[image: image.png]
however on same network on windows platform i can easily open the same path
and download the file on windows.
Thanks,
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 5:14 PM Muhammad Yousuf Khan
wrote:
> Dear
Dear All,
I have been using debian for around 10 years i havent seen such issue in my
entire life.
i have placed my servers in two different countries. means both have
different internet connection so it is not related to internet issue.
My first datacenter (USA) is using verizon and second (south
mation... Done*
>
> Here's what I get from similar command, why are you installing pkg with a
> wildcard on the end?
It just looks like an artefact of their mailer's attempt to generate
a text/plain version of their HTML email. Note the asterisks around
every line.
Cheers,
Andy
>> probably do not support the hardware anymore). As new versions of Mac
>> OS are no longer supported on this computer, would it be possible to
>> install Debian Linux as the default OS on this machine
Without a doubt. Have you tried and encountered problems?
A trivial search for "install
El jue, 04-10-2018 a las 04:04 -0700, Keifer Bly escribió:
> Hello, so I have a 2011 iMac that I am considering installing Debian
> Linux on. I am considering doing this because I cannot update Mac OS
> on this computer anymore (when I try to install Mojave I get an
> error message s
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:52:17AM -0700, Keifer Bly wrote:
> What would be the steps for doing this? Thank you.
It's just an ordinary Debian install with an EFI bootloader.
Pretend it's a similar year MacMini, if you want hand holding:
https://wiki.debian.org/MacMiniIntel
Use stretch (stable,
What would be the steps for doing this? Thank you.
On 10/4/18 4:47 AM, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:04:48AM -0700, Keifer Bly wrote:
Hello, so I have a 2011 iMac that I am considering installing Debian Linux
on. I am considering doing this because I cannot update Mac OS
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 04:04:48AM -0700, Keifer Bly wrote:
> Hello, so I have a 2011 iMac that I am considering installing Debian Linux
> on. I am considering doing this because I cannot update Mac OS on this
> computer anymore (when I try to install Mojave I get an error message
> s
Hello, so I have a 2011 iMac that I am considering installing Debian Linux
on. I am considering doing this because I cannot update Mac OS on this
computer anymore (when I try to install Mojave I get an error message
saying "could not be installed on this computer, they probably do not
su
r*
> *Reading package lists... Done*
> *Building dependency tree *
> *Reading state information... Done*
Here's what I get from similar command, why are you installing pkg with a
wildcard on the end? Are you using bash, or some other shell?
# apt -s install nfs-kernel-server*
Reading
Dear All,
When i try to install any package. in this case nfs-kernel-server i get
this error. i am using Proxmox on top of Debian 9.x. kindly advice.
*root@king:/zok/k-backup# apt install nfs-kernel-server*
*Reading package lists... Done*
*Building dependency tree *
*Reading state
On 10/2/2018 11:27 PM, ilovecountrymusic...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: john doe
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 4:10 AM
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: No sound after installing debian
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 07:49:30AM +, Curt wrote:
> [...] (in the case of Gnome where extirpation is
> impossible without taking the kitchen sink, the bath water, and the baby
> along with it).
...which is the path I ultimately took :-)
Cheers
-
rosses and the system installs with no
>> problem. How ever after booting into the new system the speech is not
>> there. I tried going to alsamixer with root access and razing the sound
>> valume with no luck. This happens both with the alfa and stable installs.
>> I tried with both
ng into the new system the speech is not
> there. I tried going to alsamixer with root access and razing the sound
> valume with no luck. This happens both with the alfa and stable installs.
> I tried with both isos installing with a gnome install as well as a mate
> install.
Hella Matthew,
There is a dedicated mailing list for Debian accessibility:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-accessibility/
>From what you describe I would surmise that you do have sound after
install but lack accessibility features like an audio screen reader.
Sorry, I have never installed or
tried going to alsamixer with root access and razing the sound
valume with no luck. This happens both with the alfa and stable installs.
I tried with both isos installing with a gnome install as well as a mate
install. I don't recall ever having this problems with this. I do not have
any bare
Bernard wrote:
> True enough, the package odvr is not in any Debian repository. Reading
> more carefully the same doc from Ray Woodcocks, I found a Google storage
> place where said package could be downloaded
>
> https://code.google.com/archive/p/odvr/downloads
>
> But... trying to install
>
True enough, the package odvr is not in any Debian repository. Reading
more carefully the same doc from Ray Woodcocks, I found a Google storage
place where said package could be downloaded
https://code.google.com/archive/p/odvr/downloads
But... trying to install
#dpkg -i
On 9/24/18 7:36 AM, Bernard wrote:
> Hi to Everyone,
>
> I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on
> Debian. According to what I read on
>
> https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/
>
> it works well once this :
>
> odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb
>
>
On 9/24/18 7:36 AM, Bernard wrote:
> Hi to Everyone,
>
> I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on
> Debian. According to what I read on
>
> https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/
>
> it works well once this :
>
> odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb
>
>
Bernard wrote:
> Hi to Everyone,
>
> I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on
> Debian. According to what I read on
>
> https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/
>
> it works well once this :
>
> odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb
>
> is installed (or
Hi to Everyone,
I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on
Debian. According to what I read on
https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/
it works well once this :
odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb
is installed (or maybe something more recent...). Problem
On Wed 19 Sep 2018 at 19:16:29 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > What I was envisaging was a windows user closing down, booting up a
> > USB stick's live Debian and corrupting their windows disk by using
> > it to store ISO files.
>
> By what words could i warn MS-Windows users of this pitfall
Hi,
> Sure, but a 32GB USB stick is now to be had for $10. Would that
> be suitable?
Well, it is an extra precondition. Maybe the USB stick is already planned
to finally hold the boot-ready ISO image.
Whatever, if an extra USB stick without valuable data is at hand, this
seems to be a viable
On Tue 18 Sep 2018 at 18:25:53 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > I mount all the "foreign" partitions readonly (both NTFS and FAT)
>
> That's a wise move in general, of course.
> But if you are downloading a BD sized ISO of 20+ GiB, then RAM based
> "disk" storage might be
Hi,
David Wright wrote:
> I mount all the "foreign" partitions readonly (both NTFS and FAT)
That's a wise move in general, of course.
But if you are downloading a BD sized ISO of 20+ GiB, then RAM based
"disk" storage might be too small.
As soon as the ISO is composed from template file and
On Tue 18 Sep 2018 at 13:21:31 (+0200), Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rick Thomas wrote:
> > For example, if your home has limited Internet bandwidth, but you can drive
> > to a library (or your place of work) where the bandwidth is better, it might
> > be better to use the DVD or BD (blue-ray)
Hi,
Rick Thomas wrote:
> For example, if your home has limited Internet bandwidth, but you can drive
> to a library (or your place of work) where the bandwidth is better, it might
> be better to use the DVD or BD (blue-ray) install image on a USB stick.
Yeah. But will a public or workplace
On Sep 17, 2018, at 10:36 AM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> "netinst" is supposed to be used by more people for installing than
> "live", and it is the much smaller download.
Indeed, the fact that it is a smaller download is the main reason why netinst
is preferred. It’
ere reported by
users. By definition, my opinion is based on hearsay, and as I'm not
motivated or organised enough to index my collection of posts, it's
not worth my time to spend it searching around for references.
As we were given a binary choice, mine was obviously for netinst.
Others are welcome
en you need to install some further packages, this will be
done via the internet.
So if Thakur's installation works fine so far, there is not much
difference to expect with an installation from "netinst".
"netinst" is supposed to be used by more people for installing than
"live", and it is the much smaller download.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On Mon 17 Sep 2018 at 18:01:29 (+0300), Thakur Mahashaya wrote:
> Dear David, if you do not complicate, then tell me why the network is better?
I follow this list, and keep an eye on others' reported problems;
nothing too specific because they often involve things that will
probably not concern
On 2018-09-17 16:01, Thakur Mahashaya wrote:
Dear David, if you do not complicate, then tell me why the network is
better?
https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
If unfamiliar perhaps you want to run live to see what software you want
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
Dear David, if you do not complicate, then tell me why the network is better?
17.09.2018, 16:18, "David Wright" :
> On Mon 17 Sep 2018 at 14:22:32 (+0300), Thakur Mahashaya wrote:
>> Hi, everybody...
>> Now I have Debian 9 ..I installed it like this
>>
On Mon 17 Sep 2018 at 14:22:32 (+0300), Thakur Mahashaya wrote:
> Hi, everybody...
> Now I have Debian 9 ..I installed it like this
> https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/debian-live-9.5.0-amd64-gnome.iso
> but it is possible and through the network.
>
On Tuesday 21 August 2018 11:06:31 David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 21 Aug 2018 at 14:48:25 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:02:02AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Odd, maybe apt does not look in $PATH?
> >
> > There's no reason to assume that,
thname to a .deb
> file on an "apt install" command. Nobody was quite sure how it worked,
> because it's undocumented.
Yes, that's why I tried it (in stretch. Simulated. Installing it
would be a bit of a stretch. Bothering to install buster first would
be going for bust.)
> Howe
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:23:59AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Second, this whole thread has been about the undocumented feature of
apt (but not apt-get) that allows you to specify a pathname to a .deb
file on an "apt install" command. Nobody was quite sure how it worked,
because it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:06:31AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 21 Aug 2018 at 14:48:25 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > To me, it would be a surprise.
>
> IMO it would be a grave bug in the Debian project's thinking.
I was trying
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:04:58AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Why would you expect it to look for a «file» at all? If you write
> # apt install gem.deb
> then apt should try to install any «packages» it finds called
> "gemadeb", "gembdeb", "gemcdeb", "gemddeb", etc, and will
> consequently
On Tue 21 Aug 2018 at 14:48:25 (+0200), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:02:02AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Odd, maybe apt does not look in $PATH?
>
> There's no reason to assume that, unless when looking for an executable
> (i.e. those things which tend to
On Tue 21 Aug 2018 at 08:02:02 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2018 06:56:45 Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On 2018-08-17 13:48:11 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > > On Fri 17 Aug 2018 at 07:31:34 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > On Friday 17 August 2018 05:29:07 Vincent
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 09:33:31AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Y'know what, I'm getting sick of apt having this feature and not
documenting it anywhere. So I decided to do an "apt-get source apt"
and try to find it in the freakin' code.
The relevant test is:
if (I != nullptr && (I[0] ==
901 - 1000 of 10463 matches
Mail list logo
