Re: 2 ipchains questions

2001-05-27 Thread Alvin Oga
hi andrew... imap connections will not timeout if you check for new mail regularly... for more ipchain/iptables examples and howtos.. c ya alvin http://www.Linux-Sec.net ... security stuff .. On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrew Perrin wrote: > Thanks for all this. The reason I'd like the masqueraded

Re: 2 ipchains questions

2001-05-27 Thread Andrew Perrin
Thanks for all this. The reason I'd like the masqueraded connections never to time out is that I'd like machines on my private network to be able to maintain connections indefinitely - specifically, IMAP connections. I'd like to be able to leave an IMAP client running on a machine and not get TCP/I

Re: 2 ipchains questions

2001-05-27 Thread Jeremy T. Bouse
For better stateful packet inspection I would recommend moving your firewall from ipchains -> iptables which has a better stateful engine... This will watch the related packets (ie- ftp & ftp-data) as well as the connections already established... Jeremy T. Bouse Andrew Perrin was

Re: 2 ipchains questions

2001-05-27 Thread Tobias Galitzien
Do something like: # for initialisation - deny everything that will not be allowed later... ipchains -P input DENY ipchains -P forward DENY ipchains -P output DENY ipchains -F # allow local things ipchains -A input -j ACCEPT -i lo ipchains -A output -j ACCEPT -i lo # allow SSH connections from

2 ipchains questions

2001-05-27 Thread Andrew Perrin
Apologies if I've already asked this - I can't remember anymore! I now have a DSL connection, and as such would like to use ipchains to do the following: 1.) Deny all incoming packets coming in on eth1 (the card connected to the DSL gateway) except those destined for port 22 (ssh) or ICMP packets

Re: Ipchains Questions

2000-06-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i really dont think you know what yer talkin about :) what do u mean by 'stealth' the firewall i set on your box will not affect outgoing traffic in any way. and as for blocking 139, it is blocking it, showing it as 'closed' is GOOD, that is what would show up if there was nothing running o

Re: Ipchains Questions

2000-06-07 Thread L. Besselink
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Jay Kelly wrote: > Hello Im running Potato for a firewall with ipchains. I would like to > increase my security and currently have all ports stealth except 25 smtp, 79 > Finger, 80 http. If I make these ports stealth will this affect the ability > to use the web and mail? I als

Ipchains Questions

2000-06-06 Thread Jay Kelly
Hello Im running Potato for a firewall with ipchains. I would like to increase my security and currently have all ports stealth except 25 smtp, 79 Finger, 80 http. If I make these ports stealth will this affect the ability to use the web and mail? I also tried to make netbois stealth but if still s