j == jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
j Since I get on average about 10 fatal crashes of netscape a day,
j when combined with the flaky behavior, I'd say that Netscape for
j linux is the most unstable but working application I've ever seen.
Fix the bugs and submit patches to Netscape.
Just in
On Mon, Jun 30, 1997 at 01:18:09AM -0400, jim wrote:
Since I get on average about 10 fatal crashes of netscape a
day, when combined with the flaky behavior, I'd say that
Netscape for linux is the most unstable but working application
I've ever seen.
Is anyone out there running netscape
Since I get on average about 10 fatal crashes of netscape a
day, when combined with the flaky behavior, I'd say that
Netscape for linux is the most unstable but working application
I've ever seen.
Is anyone out there running netscape communicator 4.0b5 and
having a good time???
--
TO
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997 01:18:09 EDT jim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Since I get on average about 10 fatal crashes of netscape a
day, when combined with the flaky behavior, I'd say that
Netscape for linux is the most unstable but working application
I've ever seen.
Is anyone out there
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, jim wrote:
Since I get on average about 10 fatal crashes of netscape a
day, when combined with the flaky behavior, I'd say that
Netscape for linux is the most unstable but working application
I've ever seen.
Is anyone out there running netscape communicator 4.0b5 and
Since I get on average about 10 fatal crashes of netscape a
day, when combined with the flaky behavior, I'd say that
Netscape for linux is the most unstable but working application
I've ever seen.
I run netscape 3.01 for days at a time without problems. (Hint: never
hit get new mail while
jim wrote:
Since I get on average about 10 fatal crashes of netscape a
day, when combined with the flaky behavior, I'd say that
Netscape for linux is the most unstable but working application
I've ever seen.
Is anyone out there running netscape communicator 4.0b5 and
having a good time???
7 matches
Mail list logo