On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 07:00:33PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hey people. While I'm not the biggest Java fan at the moment, I was
> curious about Java 1.2. I realize I can grab it from blackdown, but I noticed
> that it's not available as a deb package. It is simp
Hey people. While I'm not the biggest Java fan at the moment, I was
curious about Java 1.2. I realize I can grab it from blackdown, but I noticed
that it's not available as a deb package. It is simply too unstable for
inclusion, or is there another reason for this?
Cheers,
Mats Rynge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> I wonder what I have to do in order to be able to use Java 1.2 on my
> potato box. If I understand it right, I need glibc 2.1, which means that
> I have to go to unstable. I want to stay away from the unstable if
> possib
"A. Scott White" wrote:
>
> Oki DZ wrote:
> > create links for the executables:
> > cd /usr/bin
> > ln -s /usr/lib/jdk1.2.2/bin/java java
> > ../bin/javac javac
> > ../bin/javap javap
> > (do the same for the other executables)
it might be a lot safer an
Oki DZ wrote:
> create links for the executables:
> cd /usr/bin
> ln -s /usr/lib/jdk1.2.2/bin/java java
> ../bin/javac javac
> ../bin/javap javap
> (do the same for the other executables)
This is pretty clever. Is this a common way of putting executables i
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Mats Rynge wrote:
> I wonder what I have to do in order to be able to use Java 1.2 on my
> potato box. If I understand it right, I need glibc 2.1, which means that
> I have to go to unstable. I want to stay away from the unstable if
> possible.
>From the re
Once upon a time, I heard Mats Rynge say
> Hi!
>
> I wonder what I have to do in order to be able to use Java 1.2 on my
> potato box. If I understand it right, I need glibc 2.1, which means that
> I have to go to unstable. I want to stay away from the unstable if
> possible.
di
Hi!
I wonder what I have to do in order to be able to use Java 1.2 on my
potato box. If I understand it right, I need glibc 2.1, which means that
I have to go to unstable. I want to stay away from the unstable if
possible.
So, my question is: what is the simplest way for me to install and use
Robert Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IBM has also released a Technology Edition of their JDK 1.3
there is a third version available at http://www.blackdown.org
(supports more hardware-platforms).
--
Felix Natter
IBM has also released a Technology Edition of their JDK 1.3
It can be downloaded from their website. It probably has a much more
allowing licence than SCSL.
Robert Varga
On 24 May 2000, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> "Joe Emenaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > JavaSoft apparently released the Linux
> I assume JavaSoft = Sun Microsystems? If so, the JDK 1.2.2 has been
> out for at least a month or two.
Yeah... that's what it kinda looks like. I guess the Enterprise Edition just
came out yesterday. I had been watching the BlackDown site, since it was my
understanding that they were the people
"Joe Emenaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> JavaSoft apparently released the Linux version of the JDK 1.2.
>
> Anyone know if anyone is packaging it already?
I assume JavaSoft = Sun Microsystems? If so, the JDK 1.2.2 has been
out for at least a month or two. As far as I know it's not packaged
f
JavaSoft apparently released the Linux version of the JDK 1.2.
Anyone know if anyone is packaging it already?
- Joe
Hi David,
I am running slink also. I wouldn't say "straight slink" as I
have done MANY apt-get(s) for packages that put other packages
on etc., too many for me to keep track of, so I don't...
I got the 1.2 JDK running a few weeks ago, but after some reading
I got the impression the pre-release
Hi
I have a stock Slink system running on a K6 350 100 MHZ MB 128 MB
RAM, 8G ide drive, SiS 6326 8MB video. I have jdk1.1 deb package
installed. I need jdk1.2
I downloaded jdk1.2.2 r3 from blackdown, untarred it in /usr/local.
I set the path per install instructions from blackdown:
export PAT
Hi:
I find slink .debs for JDK 1.1 on debian.org, but not JDK 1.2.
If someone has .debs for JDK 1.2, please email me a web or ftp site.
--David
David Teague, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Because software support is free, timely,
useful, technically accurate, and friendly.
16 matches
Mail list logo
