Date sent: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 05:11:27 -0400
From: Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Copies to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: KDE/Qt Status in Debian dists
> Just b
On Wed, 07 Apr 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> > Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> > install.
>
> Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
> source to install outside the p
J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> > Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> > install.
>
> Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
> source to install outside the package manager contro
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 00:45:31 +, Terry Hancock wrote:
> On the Hamm CDs, the "Qt" library required by KDE is not included for
> licensing reasons.
> However, the Troll Tech website claims the newer versions of Qt are "free"
> software,
Qt 2.0 will be licensed under the QPL 1.0, which is a
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 05:11:27 -0400, Sean wrote:
> Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and
> install.
Bypassing the package manager is usually a bad idea, unless you compile the
source to install outside the package manager controlled directories, e.g.
by --prefi
Just bypass the whole package manager, download the source, compile and install.
This way when you decide to upgrade you won't have to worry about qt-kde getting
broken unless some of their support libraries change. And even if that does
happen,
it would just mean that you would need to recompile
Hi,
I've installed the "Hamm" (=2.0) distribution of Debian Linux from CD,
and I intended from the
start to install KDE as quickly as I could, but Debian has since gone to
"Slink" (=2.1).
On the Hamm CDs, the "Qt" library required by KDE is not included for
licensing reasons.
However, the Troll Te
7 matches
Mail list logo
