On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, Jerry Gardner wrote:
>
> I downloaded and installed the KDE 1.1 .debs on my Slink
> system. Whenever I try to run applications that use libkfile.so, I get
> the following error:
>
> % kedit &
> kedit: error in loading shared libraries
>
I downloaded and installed the KDE 1.1 .debs on my Slink
system. Whenever I try to run applications that use libkfile.so, I get
the following error:
% kedit &
kedit: error in loading shared libraries
/usr/X11R6/lib/libkfile.so.2: undefined symbol: __pure_virtual
[1]Exit
10:26:31 +0200 (MEST)
From: Burkhard Perkens-Golomb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: KDE 1.1 - SUCCESS!!
Ok, I've a "workaround": I've compiled the library
by myself. The steps:
- Download kdelibs-1.1.tar
- Untar, ./configure et
When I was using KDE, I didn't have trouble with it. I will however admit
I didn't use it for long before I broke down and learned how to setup the
fvwm2 menus, etc.
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> Anyone else having trouble with kfm? I cant get it to display directories,
> nor
Anyone else having trouble with kfm? I cant get it to display directories,
nor can I delete things on the desktop?
ANY clues?
Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP Key available, reply with "pgpkey" as subject.
---
> On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 05:01:26 +, Mark Wagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mark> "Gregory T. Norris" wrote:
>>
>> Looks like I was a tad hasty toward the end there... It seems that the
>> "-1" revision of the two kdesupport*.deb packages are ok. I see that
>> they've now removed all of the
"Gregory T. Norris" wrote:
>
> Looks like I was a tad hasty toward the end there... It seems that the
> "-1" revision of the two kdesupport*.deb packages are ok. I see that
> they've now removed all of the other (bad) "-1" packages, as well.
> Looks like it should all be fixed!
I'm grabbing them
It worked great, but it was not KDE (which I love), so I decided to
> > install KDE.
> > I downloaded KDE 1.1 from ftp.varesearch.com which I get in .deb
> > format too. When trying to install (dpkg -i kdelibs2g_1..) it returns a
> > message that sound
Looks like I was a tad hasty toward the end there... It seems that the
"-1" revision of the two kdesupport*.deb packages are ok. I see that
they've now removed all of the other (bad) "-1" packages, as well.
Looks like it should all be fixed!
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 04:45:57PM -0600, Gregory T. No
t 12:59:18PM +0100, Mathieu Legrand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I downloaded yesterday KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1) from ftp.kde.org. The .deb
> files seems to be corrupted: dpkg tells that into the deb file, there is an
> invalid ZIP file and it can't decompress. I tried to redownload the fil
, and I love it. It is
> very much better than Slackware that I ran before, or RH that I tried before
> Debian.
> I?ve installed Gnome (0.30) which I get from ftp.gnome.org in .deb
> format. It worked great, but it was not KDE (which I love), so I decided to
> install KDE.
&
tried before
Debian.
I´ve installed Gnome (0.30) which I get from ftp.gnome.org in .deb
format. It worked great, but it was not KDE (which I love), so I decided to
install KDE.
I downloaded KDE 1.1 from ftp.varesearch.com which I get in .deb
format too. When trying to install (dpkg
Hello,
I downloaded yesterday KDE 1.1 (-19990207-1) from ftp.kde.org. The .deb
files seems to be corrupted: dpkg tells that into the deb file, there is an
invalid ZIP file and it can't decompress. I tried to redownload the files
from a second computer on a different network, and this is the
In a message dated 2/6/99 8:15:28 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I need some help. I have tried with absolutely no luck to install kde 1.1
> with dpkg but I do not understand all the syntax.(do we still use that
term?)
> I think I have all the files except for
Hi,
all you have to do is
1. Update to slink (I have done so and it worked well - it may also work with
some updated hamm-packages but I don't know)
2. get qt1.42 from slink/potato
3. get the *.deb files from
ftp.[de.]kde.org/pub/.../dists/deb/potato/binary-i386/
4. install them with dpkg -i [nam
I need some help. I have tried with absolutely no luck
to install kde 1.1 with dpkg but I do not understand all the syntax.(do we still
use that term?) I think I have all the files except for qt1.42 as I am unsure of
exactly where to find it. Can someone please give me instructions for
On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 03:34:10PM -0700, John Greer wrote:
> I would like to upgrade to the KDEpre1.1 and this requires that the
> libstdc on my machine be the version that is in slink and I have a
> HAMM machine. Will this break anything if i upgrade to this version
> and fulfill the dependen
17 matches
Mail list logo
