Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-12 Thread mick crane
On 2018-08-12 19:17, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Le 12/08/2018 à 19:53, deloptes a écrit : Dale Forsyth wrote: Hello, I have a system with Kernel 4.9.0-7-686, installed RAM are 3x 1GB but free -m only show 2GB. Please pay attention when reading, replying and quoting. "Dale Forsyth" did not

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-12 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 12/08/2018 à 19:53, deloptes a écrit : Dale Forsyth wrote: Hello, I have a system with Kernel 4.9.0-7-686, installed RAM are 3x 1GB but free -m only show 2GB. Please pay attention when reading, replying and quoting. "Dale Forsyth" did not write this part. He/she/it just replied to random

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-12 Thread deloptes
Dale Forsyth wrote: > Hello, I have a system with Kernel 4.9.0-7-686, installed RAM are 3x 1GB > but free -m only show 2GB. hyperactively posting is bad ting - the question was answered coupe of days ago. The answer was install PAE kernel. regards

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-11 Thread Dale Forsyth
https://www.mycause.com.au/page/183259/a-smile-will-change-a-day-love-that-changed-my-world From: basti Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2018 10:53 PM To: Debian.org Subject: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM Hello, I have a system with Kernel 4.9.0-7-686

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-08 Thread basti
Thanks a lot for all infos right now. I will try a PAE Kernel next week. best regards On 08.08.2018 01:48, Michael Stone wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:25:14AM +0200, deloptes wrote: >> Pascal Hambourg wrote: >> >>>  But you need a >>> 686-pae or amd64 kernel to use RAM beyond 4 GiB, as

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-07 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 12:25:14AM +0200, deloptes wrote: Pascal Hambourg wrote: But you need a 686-pae or amd64 kernel to use RAM beyond 4 GiB, as Michael pointed out. but he has 3GB and machine sees only 2 - is it because kernel is not pae? I was thinking that 686 system can see (and use)

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-07 Thread deloptes
Pascal Hambourg wrote: > But you need a > 686-pae or amd64 kernel to use RAM beyond 4 GiB, as Michael pointed out. but he has 3GB and machine sees only 2 - is it because kernel is not pae? I was thinking that 686 system can see (and use) around 3GB and with some trick above, but in case of 4GB

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-07 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 07/08/2018 à 14:53, basti a écrit : Hello, I have a system with Kernel 4.9.0-7-686, installed RAM are 3x 1GB but free -m only show 2GB. Whats wrong here? (...) As I know 686 can address 4GB RAM No. It can address 4 GiB memory space. Memory space does not contain only RAM, it is also

Re: Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-07 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Aug 07, 2018 at 02:53:18PM +0200, basti wrote: Hello, I have a system with Kernel 4.9.0-7-686, installed RAM are 3x 1GB but free -m only show 2GB. Whats wrong here? Install a -pae kernel. Mike Stone

Kernel 4.9.0-7-686 Installed RAM vs. uabale RAM

2018-08-07 Thread basti
Hello, I have a system with Kernel 4.9.0-7-686, installed RAM are 3x 1GB but free -m only show 2GB. Whats wrong here? # free -m   total    used    free  shared  buff/cache   available Mem:   2018 203    1204  25 610    1569 Swap: