On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 13:34:04 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
> Himanshu Shekhar composed on 2016-04-01 22:00 (UTC+0530):
>
> > I am unable to use virtual console. Tried all combinations of cTRL+alt+f- .
> > Only X works fine. Rest all screens show an underscore (cursor) which
> > doesn't blink. I can't
>>
>>> I used the linux-image-2.6.18-6-686-bigmem kernel but had some strange
>>> problems with the server. It all booted fine but occasionally the entire
>>> system freezed for a few seconds. Both running services (smtp, pop,
>>> imap-daemons, ongoing ssh-sessions
uring last
afternoon and evening.
I booted the server with noapic, nolapic and clock=pit as kernel options
(I later saw that clock was replaced with clocksource, so I don't know
if that option changes anything) during the problems. The kernel hangs
from time to time at boot without the noapic and
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 06:10:34PM +0100, ??.
wrote:
> Quoth Douglas A. Tutty:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:39:51PM +0100, ??.
> > wrote:
> > There's and advantage to having some kind of static-linked shell (at
> > le
Quoth Eduardo M KALINOWSKI:
> Александър Л. Димитров wrote:
>> Having mulitple entries in grub isn't really much of a distraction. And the
>> kernel images don't eat a lot of memory, too. Mine is currently 1.8 MiB,
>> /lib/modules is 12 Mib, but that's only because nvidia's such a fat-ass hog.
>> O
Александър Л. Димитров wrote:
Having mulitple entries in grub isn't really much of a distraction. And the
kernel images don't eat a lot of memory, too. Mine is currently 1.8 MiB,
/lib/modules is 12 Mib, but that's only because nvidia's such a fat-ass hog.
Otherwise it would be a bout 3 MiB.
y moved to Lenny from Etch via dist-upgrade. Now I got two
> > kernel options in grub available for boot. Doesn't a dist-upgrade mean
> > that the old kernel is quite useless with the new system (with all its
> > new libraries and stuff)? If so, how do I get rid off Etch&#
Quoth Douglas A. Tutty:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:39:51PM +0100, ??.
> wrote:
> > No, the Kernel doesn't depend on those libraries. Evenything you need to
> > boot a
> > machine is in /boot and /lib/modules/`uname -r`. From then on, any
> > init-process
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:39:51PM +0100, ??.
wrote:
> Quoth Andre:
> >
> > I recently moved to Lenny from Etch via dist-upgrade. Now I got two
> > kernel options in grub available for boot. Doesn't a dist-upgrade mean
> &
On Jan 16, 2008 9:20 AM, Paul Cartwright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can I reboot into the older kernel and will the nvidia driver work?
Absolutely. I ran into a similar issue where I installed a new kernel
without building ndiswrapper for it. I had uninstalled the module source
package, so
On Wed January 16 2008, Александър Л. Димитров wrote:
> > I have a question about this, please.
> > I have an NVIDIA card, and after some updates I get the black screen of
> > death, and I have to change my video driver to nv and restart X.
> > If I reboot into an older kernel, will my nvidia drive
Quoth Paul Cartwright:
> I have a question about this, please.
> I have an NVIDIA card, and after some updates I get the black screen of
> death,
> and I have to change my video driver to nv and restart X.
> If I reboot into an older kernel, will my nvidia driver work? It never fails,
> I need t
On Wed January 16 2008, Александър Л. Димитров wrote:
> No, the Kernel doesn't depend on those libraries. Evenything you need to
> boot a machine is in /boot and /lib/modules/`uname -r`. From then on, any
> init-process may get called, which will most likely depend on _a lot_ of
> libs, but that's
Quoth Andre:
> Hi there
>
> I recently moved to Lenny from Etch via dist-upgrade. Now I got two
> kernel options in grub available for boot. Doesn't a dist-upgrade mean
> that the old kernel is quite useless with the new system (with all its
> new libraries and stuff)? If s
If the lastest kernel hangs, you could probe with the previous kernel
I think this is the reason
On Jan 16, 2008 11:02 AM, Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I recently moved to Lenny from Etch via dist-upgrade. Now I got two
> kernel options in grub available f
Hi there
I recently moved to Lenny from Etch via dist-upgrade. Now I got two
kernel options in grub available for boot. Doesn't a dist-upgrade mean
that the old kernel is quite useless with the new system (with all its
new libraries and stuff)? If so, how do I get rid off Etch's
I have a 2.6 kernel and I am recompiling it to include sound suport for
' 82801BA/BAM AC'97 Audio'.
I have included ALSA but under this there are a number of options
including 'Generic Devices' and 'PCI Devices'. After mutch googling I
cant work out whitch of these 'devices' to include.
Regar
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 08:15:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing Debian on a Sun Fire V65x, which is basically an intel whitebox
> server. It uses the SE7501WV2 board
> (http://www.intel.com/design/servers/se7501wv2/index.htm?iid=ipp_srvr+mthrbds_se7501wv2_srvr&;).
>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 08:15:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The server has all sorts of fancy bells and whistles like e1000 cards and aic79xx
> scsi. Since I'm installing woody, I'd like to stick with a Debian kernel, but sadly
> no stable kernels have aic79xx in them already. Lots of
Hi,
I'm installing Debian on a Sun Fire V65x, which is basically an intel whitebox server.
It uses the SE7501WV2 board
(http://www.intel.com/design/servers/se7501wv2/index.htm?iid=ipp_srvr+mthrbds_se7501wv2_srvr&;).
The server has all sorts of fancy bells and whistles like e1000 cards and aic7
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..shorewall is neat. Using the webmin gui module?
Nope, editing the configuration file by hand.
..if you're a iptables newbie fresh from the ipchains bronze age world,
just make sure you understand the subtle new meanings to a few
things in iptables. ;-)
Heh, I never
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:04:07 -0800,
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > .._I_ would add everything in netfilter/iptables and remove ipchains
> > support, and make use of iptables statefullness features, up high in
> > in my rule lists, s
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
.._I_ would add everything in netfilter/iptables and remove ipchains
support, and make use of iptables statefullness features, up high in
in my rule lists, seatch netfilter.org mailing lists for samples of
" -j ALLOW RELATED,ESTABLISHED " in action.
Well, that's a given. Th
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 20:39:04 +0100,
Alf Werder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 20:17, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > I've got a machine that I do not have physical access to but
> > would like
> > to recompile the kernel for. As you can expect
- Original Message -
From: "John L. Fjellstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 06:21
Subject: Re: Kernel options, modules, etc.
> Hoyt Bailey wrote:
>
> > Ok that means I have to unpack kernel source
Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> Ok that means I have to unpack kernel source to get the required
> documents. Thanks,
> Hoyt
You could just install the kernel-docs...
apt-get install kernel-doc-x.y.zz
--
John L. Fjellstad
web: http://www.fjellstad.org/
Hello
Steve Lamb (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I've got a machine that I do not have physical access to but would
> like to recompile the kernel for. As you can expect I would need to
> make absolutely sure that the kernel configuration I come up with is
> right the first time. Currently it
And thus we see that Steve Lamb said, :
I've got a machine that I do not have physical access to but would like
to recompile the kernel for. As you can expect I would need to make
absolutely sure that the kernel configuration I come up with is right the
first time. Currently it is running
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 20:17, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I've got a machine that I do not have physical access to but would like
> to recompile the kernel for. As you can expect I would need to make
> absolutely sure that the kernel configuration I come up with is right the
> first time. Currentl
I've got a machine that I do not have physical access to but would like
to recompile the kernel for. As you can expect I would need to make
absolutely sure that the kernel configuration I come up with is right the
first time. Currently it is running the default kernel from woody
(2.2.20-i
- Original Message -
From: "Oliver Elphick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hoyt Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "debian-user" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 19:49
Subject: Re: Kernel options, modules, etc.
> On Wed, 20
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 00:04, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> There has been a lot of talk about kernels on the list lately and I am at a
> loss to understand what options or modules are required. Is there a
> document that lists these items that I could read.
The modules you need are the ones that correspon
There has been a lot of talk about kernels on the list lately and I am at a
loss to understand what options or modules are required. Is there a
document that lists these items that I could read.
Hoyt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 09:46, Tim wrote:
> Is there a website which accounts for the specs of the different
> kernels?
kernel.org has changelogs associated with releases describing changes made
from the previous revision. The information is fine grained.
--
Mike Mueller
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is there a website which accounts for the specs of the different
kernels? I would like to compare them to see what advancements have
been made, eg. is UDF write capability available for CD-RW in newer
kernels? I'm currently using 2.4.18.
Thanks,
--- Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
> Gary Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When asked: ...install a partition boot block on /dev/hda1?
> > I answer: yes - I originally set up debian to have the mbr on
> /dev/hda
>
> You want to write
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 17:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
Gary Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm compiling a kernel using the docs provided at
> http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html and it's all
> good but is there a doc somewhere that explains the options in the
> kernel configurati
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Gary Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When asked: ...install a partition boot block on /dev/hda1?
> I answer: yes - I originally set up debian to have the mbr on /dev/hda
You want to write the boot loader to the MBR, not the partition boot sector.
If
--- Shawn Lamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, July 07 at 5:22 PM EDT
> Gary Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Hi, I'm compiling a kernel using the docs provided at
> >http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html and it's all
> >good but is there a doc somewhere that exp
On Mon, July 07 at 5:22 PM EDT
Gary Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, I'm compiling a kernel using the docs provided at
>http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html and it's all
>good but is there a doc somewhere that explains the options in the
>kernel configuration better?
Hi, I'm compiling a kernel using the docs provided at
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html and it's all
good but is there a doc somewhere that explains the options in the
kernel configuration better? Especially helpful would be something
that says 'don't say no to that one' or w
> "Doug" == Doug MacFarlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> If you want to have it loaded every time you boot up, add a line to
>> the end of /etc/modules that just says "af_packet". You could
>> instead try adding a line "alias net-pf-17 af_packet" (at least
>> that's what the kernel d
On 18 Nov 2002, 16:10:25, Hubert Chan wrote:
> Doug> In the 2.4.16-SMP prepackaged kernel I'm using, CONFIG_UNIX=3Dm
> Doug> is what's set in the config-2.4.16-SMP file . . . I don't know
> Doug> what the m means . . .
>
> The m means that it's compiled as a loadable module i.e. you can
> dynamica
> "Doug" == Doug MacFarlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Doug> On 17 Nov 2002, 15:31:38, Hubert Chan wrote:
>>
Doug> Per Vincent, I simply need to edit my /.config file and voila.
>> You need to recompile too, of course.
>>
>> You say you're using a prepackaged kernel. Which one are you usin
On 17 Nov 2002, 15:31:38, Hubert Chan wrote:
>
> Doug> Per Vincent, I simply need to edit my /.config file and voila.
>
> You need to recompile too, of course.
>
> You say you're using a prepackaged kernel. Which one are you using?
> All the official Debian packages should have both options set
> "Doug" == Doug MacFarlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Doug> Per Vincent, I simply need to edit my /.config file and voila.
You need to recompile too, of course.
You say you're using a prepackaged kernel. Which one are you using?
All the official Debian packages should have both opt
On 17 Nov 2002, 17:14:58, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Sunday 17 November 2002 4:50 pm, Doug MacFarlane wrote:
> > OK - static network config works fine. DHCP doesn't, with the usual
> > messages about the socket filter and packet socket needing to be set to
> > yes
>
> Are you talking pcmcia here?
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:50:28PM +, Doug MacFarlane wrote:
>
> OK - static network config works fine. DHCP doesn't, with the usual messages
> about the socket filter and packet socket needing to be set to yes . . .
> .
you have to got in your .config:
CONFIG_FILTER=y
CONFIG_UNIX=y
this op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 17 November 2002 4:50 pm, Doug MacFarlane wrote:
> OK - static network config works fine. DHCP doesn't, with the usual
> messages about the socket filter and packet socket needing to be set to yes
> . . .
Are you talking pcmcia here?
- --
OK - static network config works fine. DHCP doesn't, with the usual messages
about the socket filter and packet socket needing to be set to yes . . .
.
So where do I set these two options? I use a pre-packaged kernel.
madmac
--
Doug MacFarlane
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 11:47:12PM +0300, Amir Tal wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 September 2002 23:40, Andy Saxena wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to know if there are any side-effects of copying the .config file
> > from one kernel source tree to another.
>
> by all means ;)
> then run (from the new so
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 05:58:47PM -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:42:39PM -0700, nate wrote:
> > never used oldconfig, I usually just manually re-configure each kernel
> > as I get them(habbit? maybe).
> >
>
> Also, I'd like to know that if I copied .config from 2.4.4 to
Andy Saxena wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:42:39PM -0700, nate wrote:
>
>
>>never used oldconfig, I usually just manually re-configure each kernel
>>as I get them(habbit? maybe).
>>
>>
>>
>
>How do you do it? Isn't it a pain to go through the entire configuration
>routine when, perhaps,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:42:39PM -0700, nate wrote:
> never used oldconfig, I usually just manually re-configure each kernel
> as I get them(habbit? maybe).
>
How do you do it? Isn't it a pain to go through the entire configuration
routine when, perhaps, all you want is an additional feature t
Just thought I'd make this part of the mailing list.
-Andy
--- Begin Message ---
Andy Saxena wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I want to know if there are any side-effects of copying the .config file
>from one kernel source tree to another.
>
>Specifically, there are two cases that I am interested in:
>
>1.) Cop
Kenneth Macdonald Karlsen wrote:
> Andy Saxena wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to know if there are any side-effects of copying the .config file
>> from one kernel source tree to another.
>>
>> Specifically, there are two cases that I am interested in:
>>
>> 1.) Copying config file from the 2.2 seri
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 23:40, Andy Saxena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to know if there are any side-effects of copying the .config file
> from one kernel source tree to another.
by all means ;)
then run (from the new source directory) : make oldconfig .
you will be prompted only for the new c
Andy Saxena said:
> Hi,
>
> I want to know if there are any side-effects of copying the .config file
> from one kernel source tree to another.
>
> Specifically, there are two cases that I am interested in:
>
> 1.) Copying config file from the 2.2 series to the 2.4 series.
I wouldn't try this..
>
Hi,
I want to know if there are any side-effects of copying the .config file
from one kernel source tree to another.
Specifically, there are two cases that I am interested in:
1.) Copying config file from the 2.2 series to the 2.4 series.
2.) Copying the config file from one minor version to an
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Re: kernel options/settings
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, Sep 28, 2000
at 05:07:21PM -0500
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:07:21PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> okay, with
> apt-get in
okay, with
apt-get install kernel-package
cd /usr/source/kernel-source*
make menuconfig
you can specify what options you want to include
and exclude from your own version of the kernel.
so...
how can you tell what options have already been included
from the existing/runni
And, the non-debian option --
/usr/src/linux/.config has all the options too, if you ran
make [menu|x]config. :)
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 04:23:38PM -0500, Gregory T. Norris wrote:
> If it's either a Debian-supplied kernel, or one in which make-kpkg was
> used to create an installable debfile, you
If it's either a Debian-supplied kernel, or one in which make-kpkg was
used to create an installable debfile, you will find it's config-file in
/boot/config-VERSION.
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 02:02:50PM -0700, Fish Smith wrote:
> Please send replies directly to me, as I am not
> subscribed to the li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, Fish Smith wrote:
> Please send replies directly to me, as I am not
> subscribed to the list.
It's considered more polite to ask for CCs to you, instead of [implicitly]
asking for replies to go only to you. Since the question is on topic fo
Please send replies directly to me, as I am not
subscribed to the list.
How can I view which options my current kernel is
compiled with? I am trying to compile a new one and I
do not have my hardware manual, so I want to keep
everything the same except adding sound and module
addability.
Thnx very
>
> I should have stressed `recent kernels'. 2.0.29 is kinda old;
> this option was only put into the kernel-package recently. The
> following is what is used in kernel-image-2.0.32_2.0.32-5.deb on the
> i386 platforms.
>
> I hope this helps.
>
Yes indeed it does. Although some
Hi,
>>"Kenneth" == Kenneth L Summers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think you need the config file from a distribution kernel. On
>> recent kernel, this is in /boot/config-. You can use dpkg
>> -x kernel-image*.deb /tmp to extract the default kernel to /tmp;
>> look then in /tmp/boot
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Kenneth L. Summers wrote:
: >
: > Isn't the .config file in the kernel-source package the same as the
: > distribution kernel?
:
: I don't think so. At least is seems like when I go to configure the kernel
: it has some options set by default that do not seem reasonable for
>
> Isn't the .config file in the kernel-source package the same as the
> distribution kernel?
I don't think so. At least is seems like when I go to configure the kernel
it has some options set by default that do not seem reasonable for the
distribution kernel. As a (possibly fictional) exampl
On Thu, 26 Mar 1998, Kenneth L. Summers wrote:
: > Hi,
: >
: > I think you need the config file from a distribution
: > kernel. On recent kernel, this is in /boot/config-. You can
: > use dpkg -x kernel-image*.deb /tmp to extract the default kernel to
: > /tmp; look then in /tmp/boot for t
> Hi,
>
> I think you need the config file from a distribution
> kernel. On recent kernel, this is in /boot/config-. You can
> use dpkg -x kernel-image*.deb /tmp to extract the default kernel to
> /tmp; look then in /tmp/boot for the config file; use kernel-package
> to rebuild the kerne
Hi,
I think you need the config file from a distribution
kernel. On recent kernel, this is in /boot/config-. You can
use dpkg -x kernel-image*.deb /tmp to extract the default kernel to
/tmp; look then in /tmp/boot for the config file; use kernel-package
to rebuild the kernel. (look at
Hello to the group.
I have what seems like an obvious question, but after a lot of research I
haven't been able to come up with an answer. If I want to build an *exact*
duplicate of the distribution kernel, how do I do that? Specifically, what
options were used to build the distribution kernel a
73 matches
Mail list logo
