On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:47:03 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
(...)
disturbances?
Have you upgraded a Debian from old-new stable before?
(...)
Nope, never ever. In Spanish I would say jamás de los jamases :-)
In do run in
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:33:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Why can't you use squeeze?
--
Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:45:25 -0500
Tony Baldwin tonybald...@gmx.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:46:38PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
The official upgrade process for Lenny to Squeeze was not as easy
as a simple dist-upgrade, and I wonder if Lenny-to-Wheezy would be
too
It
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:46:38 -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
(...)
You probably missed
http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00010.html
,
| In the
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:33:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Why can't you use squeeze?
--
Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Indeed, I do can, but I prefer to accomodate the span-life of the
On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
Yes, unfortunately Debian team changed their mind at the middle of the
proccess. This unforeseen change forces me to keep my lenny systems until
wheezy is released which means having unpatched
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
Yes, unfortunately Debian team changed their mind at the middle of the
proccess. This unforeseen change forces me to keep
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:36:07 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
Yes, unfortunately Debian team changed their mind at the middle of the
proccess. This unforeseen change forces me to keep my lenny systems
On 06/01/12 23:11, � wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:36:07 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
snipped
it came out the possibility of having release freeze periods and the
above mentioned announcement lead
On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
Sure (this was also discussed in this same list, time ago...). The
possibility of jumping from Lenny to Wheezy was oficially mentioned here:
Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:33:08 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:36:49 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
(...)
Why can't you use squeeze?
--
Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Indeed, I do can,
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
Sure (this was also discussed in this same list, time ago...). The
possibility of jumping from Lenny to Wheezy was oficially mentioned
here:
Debian decides to adopt time-based release
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
Sure (this was also discussed in this same list, time ago...). The
possibility of jumping from Lenny to Wheezy was
On Friday 06 January 2012 21:46:38 Steven Rosenberg wrote:
Truth be told, I'd just do a reinstall of Wheezy when the time comes.
That's generally a good idea anyway! (IMHO, of ciourse.)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Canaima (debian derivative) made an update assistant [1] for the upgrade
from it's lenny-based version (2.1) to it's squeeze-based (3.0), and
everything worked out ok for users: they didn't have to reinstall.
You can take a look at it's main script [2] (bash, comments in spanish).
¿Is this
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Camaleón wrote:
El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
(resending to the list)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
There was discussion here a few months ago
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:46:38PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
Yup, I did read it, but it does not say a word about
El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
(resending to the list)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
date for end of life on Lenny. This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
And then there is Trinity (www.trinitydesktop.org) continuing KDE 3
development. I am using it very successfully on Squeeze - John
Yes indeed, when the Trinity mirrors are working again and the most
irritating of the
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:36:49 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
(resending to the list)
Camaleón noela...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
There was discussion here a few months ago about there
There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official date
for end of life on Lenny. This has changed. I just noticed this item
on the security announcement mailing list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2011/msg00238.html
No new Lenny updates after 6
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400, francis picabia wrote:
There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official date
for end of life on Lenny. This has changed. I just noticed this item
on the security announcement mailing list:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony Baldwin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400, francis picabia wrote:
There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
date for end of life on Lenny. This has changed. I just noticed this
item on the security
- Original Message -
From: Lisi
Sent: 01/04/12 10:34 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Lenny (Debian 5.0) approaching end of life
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony Baldwin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400, francis picabia wrote
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:43:12 tony baldwin wrote:
Now I really prefer light, efficient, simple.
Horses for courses!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:34 +, Lisi wrote:
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony Baldwin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400, francis picabia wrote:
There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
date for end of life on Lenny. This has
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
date for end of life on Lenny. This has changed. I just noticed this
item on the security announcement mailing list:
On 05/01/12 02:43, tony baldwin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Lisi
Sent: 01/04/12 10:34 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Lenny (Debian 5.0) approaching end of life
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony Baldwin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400
28 matches
Mail list logo
