On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:47:18 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:21:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Camaleón wrote:
...
> >> Uh? A plain USB or a PCMCIA/Smart PC card (being both hardware based
> >> modems) will do the job quite well. An
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:21:44 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Camaleón wrote:
>> > You will have to buy a driver from Linuxant if you want that thing to
>> > work.
>>
>> Why? Is the free version of their software not working at all? :-?
>
> Can you actually use 1
On 24/06/11 10:28, Doug wrote:
> On 06/23/2011 08:07 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
>>
>> On Thursday 23 June 2011 02:20:11 pm Doug wrote:
> I thougth softmodems were really bad but Conexant chipset based
>
>>
> Thanx. Will do. Actually, i have used lspci before, but forgot it. Is
> there
> a "to
On 06/23/2011 08:07 PM, Greg Madden wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011 02:20:11 pm Doug wrote:
I thougth softmodems were really bad but Conexant chipset based ones at
least provide two sets of drivers... are you saying nooone work?
I don't normally use a modem, but I do have a laptop--a Dell Insp
On Thursday 23 June 2011 02:20:11 pm Doug wrote:
> >> I thougth softmodems were really bad but Conexant chipset based ones at
> >> least provide two sets of drivers... are you saying nooone work?
>
> I don't normally use a modem, but I do have a laptop--a Dell Inspiron--and
> I wonder what comman
I thougth softmodems were really bad but Conexant chipset based ones at
least provide two sets of drivers... are you saying nooone work?
I don't normally use a modem, but I do have a laptop--a Dell Inspiron--and
I wonder what command determines what kind of modem chipset you have?
Thanx--doug
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:12:22 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Camaleón wrote:
> >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:27:44 -0700, Bill wrote:
> >> > I was wondering if anyone had succeeded in getting the POTS built-in
> >> > modem on a T
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:12:22 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:27:44 -0700, Bill wrote:
>> > I was wondering if anyone had succeeded in getting the POTS built-in
>> > modem on a T410 to work with squeeze. I only need the mode
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:27:44 -0700, Bill wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone had succeeded in getting the POTS built-in
> > modem on a T410 to work with squeeze. I only need the modem for a backup
> > on those rare occasions when POTS is all there is, but I w
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:27:44 -0700, Bill wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had succeeded in getting the POTS built-in
> modem on a T410 to work with squeeze. I only need the modem for a backup
> on those rare occasions when POTS is all there is, but I would like to
> have it configured.
Those da
Bill wrote at 2011-06-22 22:27 -0600:
> I was wondering if anyone had succeeded in getting the POTS
> built-in modem on a T410 to work with squeeze. I only need the
No success here: the modem in my T61 *still* does not work with Debian amd64.
You might want to try asking on the
mailing list. I
Hi folks,
I was wondering if anyone had succeeded in getting the POTS
built-in modem on a T410 to work with squeeze. I only need the
modem for a backup on those rare occasions when POTS is all
there is, but I would like to have it configured.
After a night on Google, I discover that the Linuxa
12 matches
Mail list logo
