Hi It would be nice to see links to the Bug Tracking System (BTS) from the web pages the individual packages can be downloaded on www.debian.org. Those interested in upgrading individual packages would so be able to check the reported bugs before starting the process which might break their working systems. By the way, I was just curious about the way NetBSD implements their BTS (they use GNATS). For those interested, have a look at http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/send-pr.html. and http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/query-pr.html for query about known bugs. I think Debian would benefit from something like that Thanks, Lazaro -- Lazaro D. Salem E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RF-Rogaland Research Phone: +47 51 87 50 00 P.O.Box 2503, Ullandhaug Direct: +47 51 87 50 65 N-4004 Stavanger, NORWAY Fax: +47 51 87 52 00
> Two questions: > 1. What's good about GNU libc? > 2. Whose libc is libc5? LIBC5 is GNU libc with substantial patches for Linux. LIBC6 is GNU libc with the Linux support merged back in to the main source thread. GNU calls these LIBC 1 and 2. We call it LIBC6 on Linux because our version numbers didn't follow the GNU ones. All Linux distributions will go to LIBC6. There are no hold-outs that I know of. Bruce Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 17:01:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Jean Pierre LeJacq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: xemacs and emacs Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I have both working fine on my system which is based on the unstable branch. Didn't have to do anything special. -- Jean Pierre On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Steve Hsieh wrote: > Can someone explain why the xemacs and emacs packages can't coexist on the > same Debian system? (What would it take to make them coexist?) -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .