On Thu 28 Jul 2022 at 14:27:31 (+), Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> Von: David Wright Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2022 19:04
> > On Wed 27 Jul 2022 at 16:51:19 (+), Schwibinger Michael wrote:
> > > HP printers have a self check.
> >
> > Yes, and sometimes several (printing, wireless, fax, et
then click
self check
same in win before
and the HP 600 ist producing a check page.
Now=no.
Sophie
Thank You
Von: David Wright
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juli 2022 19:04
An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Betreff: Re: Three unsolvable Problems PRINTER SELFCHE
.
Regards
Sophie
Von: Hans
Gesendet: Montag, 25. April 2022 07:07
An: Debian-user List Debian
Cc: Schwibinger Michael
Betreff: Re: AW: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linus...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot
boot
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2022, 18:53:44 CEST schrieb
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2022, 18:53:44 CEST schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
Hello,
first of all, I believe, your hardddrive is corrupt. You should do a filesystem
check, maybe withj a
livefile system like Knoppix or similar.
>From the log:
Apr 24 17:02:52 ah kernel: [40646.269
reen?
does the keyboard work?
---
If you can split down to the simplest steps and tell me as if I am 3 years
old, it will help :)
With every good wish,
Andy Cater
>
> ____
> Von: Hans
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. April 2022 12:03
> An: debian-user@
Betreff: Re: Here Newbie---Amateur in Linus...Problem: Debian LXDE cannot boot
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2022, 09:47:59 CEST schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
Hi Sophie,
maybe you could specify, what is crashing.
Is it the kernel itself (kernel panic) ?
Or does X not start and you are finished with the
Am Sonntag, 24. April 2022, 09:47:59 CEST schrieb Schwibinger Michael:
Hi Sophie,
maybe you could specify, what is crashing.
Is it the kernel itself (kernel panic) ?
Or does X not start and you are finished with the prompt?
If X is not starting, then you get a problem with the graphics driver.
Good morning
What did we do:
Update Debian 9 to 10,
boot: Crash.
What did we do wrong.
Where does Linux create a logfile to send it to You find the bug.
What we can do:
We do boot with the recovery mode.
Regards
Sophie
unities for collaboration and development.
3) Debian Derivers Roundtable discussion - prominent developers of
Debian-derived works, including Martin (Debian Edu). 1hr
Linus Torvalds on Git - Git is a rewrite from scratch concurrent
versioning system that Linus wrote to replace cvs, subversion
On torsdag 20 oktober 2005, 00:59, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:44:06AM +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > Linus' backup strategy,
>
> Is that the one wher you posting it all on usenet and find it later
> in the archives?
Almost:
"Backups are for
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 at 10:09:45 +, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> In general I would run WITH the patches, since powers greater than I
> have decided they would be a good idea. Debian certainly is something
> greater than I ;-)
>
What I don't understand is how you apply debian patches to a kern
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 at 08:59:14 +, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> You're free to continue using the stock kernels and you'll have no
> problems with it. The Debian kernels are just there for convenience. On
Ah, that is good to know.
> You should put your signature after "-- ", not "--". That's two "
y would be a good idea. Debian certainly is something
greater than I ;-)
I'm going to look at what these patches are. Back in the Herb Xu era, I
disliked the volume of backports and somewhat untested stuff that was put
in the debian kernel.
Debian Kernel 2.6.8 could burn CD's.
Linus' K
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:09:45AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Mauro Darida wrote:
> >hello debianers,
> >I have always been wondering what is the difference between a fresh
> >kernel from linus and a debian kernel; I have always been using the
> >first one, maybe I
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:14:53 -0800, Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian Kernel 2.6.8 could burn CD's.
> Linus' Kernel 2.6.8 couldn't.
I'm not sold on 2.6 yet.
--
Jon Dowland
http://jon.dowland.name/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 17:14, Ken Bloom wrote:
>
> Debian Kernel 2.6.8 could burn CD's.
> Linus' Kernel 2.6.8 couldn't.
Except for me. I can't burn CDs on either. I now understand why though (afre
a massive debugging effert), its a timing issue with my dr
than I
>>> have decided they would be a good idea. Debian certainly is something
>>> greater than I ;-)
>>
>> I'm going to look at what these patches are. Back in the Herb Xu era, I
>> disliked the volume of backports and somewhat untested stuff that was
nly is something
>> greater than I ;-)
>
> I'm going to look at what these patches are. Back in the Herb Xu era, I
> disliked the volume of backports and somewhat untested stuff that was put
> in the debian kernel.
Debian Kernel 2.6.8 could burn CD's.
Linus' Kernel
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:09:45 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In general I would run WITH the patches, since powers greater than I
> have decided they would be a good idea. Debian certainly is something
> greater than I ;-)
I'm going to look at what these patches are. Back in t
Mauro Darida wrote:
hello debianers,
I have always been wondering what is the difference between a fresh
kernel from linus and a debian kernel; I have always been using the
first one, maybe I have always been wrong?? No visible side effects
here, though...
Saluti, Mauro.
--
On this laptop no
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 10:47 +0100, Mauro Darida wrote:
> hello debianers,
> I have always been wondering what is the difference between a fresh
> kernel from linus and a debian kernel; I have always been using the
> first one, maybe I have always been wrong?? No visible side effects
&g
hello debianers,
I have always been wondering what is the difference between a fresh
kernel from linus and a debian kernel; I have always been using the
first one, maybe I have always been wrong?? No visible side effects
here, though...
Saluti, Mauro.
--
On this laptop no Windows system survives
Hi World!
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/23/technology/23linux.html
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the ac line of code) and a new one (in the
> > main line of code).
> >
> > Before this became clear, I was planning to move up to 2.4.10 from 2.4.4
> > as it seemed that things were converging to a stable core.
>
> Things are getting much more stable. Drivers
Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
>Can someone help me understand if I should move to the new VM or just
>wait for this to all get sorted out? What is being done for the next
>release of Debian? (I'm running 2.2r3 with Adrian Bunk's 2.4 packages).
If you're running a production server running 2.4.x kerne
.
>
> Before this became clear, I was planning to move up to 2.4.10 from 2.4.4
> as it seemed that things were converging to a stable core.
Things are getting much more stable. Drivers especially. Linus seems to be
willing to work on core stuff still...
>
> Can someone help me unde
I am confused about the state of the 2.4.10 kernel.
It seems that there are two VMs that are going to "fight it out" moving
forward: the original one (in the ac line of code) and a new one (in the
main line of code).
Before this became clear, I was planning to move up to 2.4.10 from 2.4.4
as it s
Hello:
My name is Emilio Milian, I teach computer classes at South San
Francisco Adult Education Center, at 825 Southwood Dr, South San
Francisco.
I plan/intend to teach a quick 4 week/basic course to my Windows
students about Linux. This will be schedule for about April of this
year.
Can you he
ux 2.3.4 i586)
To: svlug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [svlug] Linus Torvalds at BALUG Debian Benefit on 6/15, RSVP ASAP.
Linus Torvalds to Headline Benefit Dinner for Debian Project
Linuxcare, VA Linux Systems to Sponsor Event at Upcoming BALUG
Meeting
June 7, 1999 Linus Torvalds, creat
On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 07:48:27PM -0600, Jonathan Hayward wrote:
> 1: XFree86 was downgraded from 3.3.3 to 3.3.2.1. 3.3.3 supports my video
> card; 3.3.2.1 does not. This means that my X display is now
> (mal)functioning at 320x200 -- I can see the lower right quadrant of an
> xterm. The machin
On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Jonathan Hayward wrote:
>
> 1: XFree86 was downgraded from 3.3.3 to 3.3.2.1. 3.3.3 supports my
> video
Apt will not downgrade any package, I don't believe. You mean that the X
package overwrote your manually installed copy. (Not to nitpick, just
trying to clarify so we are a
Jonathan Hayward writes:
> The machine was also set to start xdm on boot; coming in with a rescue
> floppy was the only way I could figure out to get it to boot and give a
> text terminal (I did not have the boot scripts start xdm before).
I agree that this a serious bug. The authorities don't ag
Linus Torvalds is standing at the Pearly Gates as people are coming in.
He
asks the first person, "What's your IQ?"
"150."
"I'd like your opinion on some things I've been thinking about in
termsof
tools to partially automate the process of porting a ke
"shaleh" == shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
shaleh> acct.c: In function `sys_acct': acct.c:197: too few arguments
shaleh> to function `filp_close' acct.c:203: too few arguments to
shaleh> function `filp_close'
Add ", NULL" to the invocations of filp_close.
netgod
>
>
> I've put the source, patch, and debs of this at the usual place
> (http://netgod.net/). ISDN is compiled in now (I think).
>
Has anyone compiled this successfully in potato? I get the following
acct.c: In function `sys_acct':
acct.c:197: too few arguments to function `filp_close'
acct.
I've put the source, patch, and debs of this at the usual place
(http://netgod.net/). ISDN is compiled in now (I think).
netgod
--- Forwarded Message
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:46:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kernel Mailing L
George Bonser wrote:
> Don't even think Linus should BE the person of the century. That honor
> probably goes to Thomas Edison. We owe our current culture and style of
> living to that guy. His experiments with his lightbulb led to the
> discovery of the "Edison effect&quo
I sense another inminent Holy war comming :(
Richard Harran wrote:
> Oh, goodie! A religious discussion!
>
> Kent West wrote:
> >
> > At 04:13 PM 3/5/1999 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >Kevin Traas schrieb:
> > >>
> > >> Hey, Linus
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Frankie wrote:
> True. I agree with you about electricity. It has made a HUGE impact on
> our lives. So, I nominate gallileo, because (if I'm wrong, subsitute
> some ridiculously ancient bod that experimented with electricity) he
> messed about with electricity and frogs legs. T
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > Nope I don't think I will vote for any person on the basis of
> > scientific or technical merit. A more global view is required.
>
> I was thinking of RMS, too.
LOL - Spoken like a true Debian-ite.
I'd put RMS #2, right after Mr. T.
> "There is no gravity in space
Frankie wrote:
>
> George Bonser wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > just did, but is this list not moderated, Jesus Christ is so far I now,
> > > from a different century and he is on top?
> > >
> > >
Richard Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Oh, goodie! A religious discussion!
> >
>
> OK I'm voting for Adam. Without him we all would be dust.
Or a bunch of cheeky monkeys...
--
-Mike Horansky, Unix Systems Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Conformity is everything--isn't it?"
OPINIONS EXP
George Bonser wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > just did, but is this list not moderated, Jesus Christ is so far I now,
> > from a different century and he is on top?
> >
> > Matth
>
> Don't even think Linus should BE the
On Fri, Mar 05, 1999 at 09:50:30AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> Don't even think Linus should BE the person of the century. That honor
> probably goes to Thomas Edison. We owe our current culture and style of
> living to that guy. His experiments with his lightbulb led to the
>
>
I can think of no single individual that had as great an impact on the
daily life of the entire world. Whatever we were to become in the 20th
century, we would get there in the company of Edison.
---
Although we may owe a lot to Edison, most of us choose to ignore
on this century than Linus - we've had two World Wars this century, and
survived. I suspect that most people who are involved in this vote
aren't going to remember anything much before Elvis!
Rich
George Bonser wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Richard Lyon wrote:
>
> >
&g
> Don't even think Linus should BE the person of the century. That honor
> probably goes to Thomas Edison. We owe our current culture and style of
If you want to go with the guy who had the biggest slam-bang effect on
everything, it's either Oppenheimer or Truman.
> livi
On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 10:19:57PM +1100, Richard Lyon wrote:
> Nope I don't think I will vote for any person on the basis of scientific or
> technical merit. A more global view is required.
I was thinking of RMS, too.
--
G. Branden Robinson | "There is no gravity in space."
Debi
> Oh, goodie! A religious discussion!
>
OK I'm voting for Adam. Without him we all would be dust.
> Don't even think Linus should BE the person of the century. That honor
> probably goes to Thomas Edison. We owe our current culture and style of
> living to that guy. His experiments with his lightbulb led to the
> discovery of the "Edison effect" which led DeForest to
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, George Bonser wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> just did, but is this list not moderated, Jesus Christ is so far I now,
>> from a different century and he is on top?
>>
>> Matth
>
>Don't even think Linus should
Oh, goodie! A religious discussion!
Kent West wrote:
>
> At 04:13 PM 3/5/1999 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Kevin Traas schrieb:
> >>
> >> Hey, Linus Torvalds isn't even in the top 20! Let's change that! ;-)
> >>
> >> >Time Ma
At 04:13 PM 3/5/1999 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Kevin Traas schrieb:
>>
>> Hey, Linus Torvalds isn't even in the top 20! Let's change that! ;-)
>>
>> >Time Magazine is allowing us to vote for Time Magazines
>> >Person of the Century, wh
Kevin Traas schrieb:
>
> Hey, Linus Torvalds isn't even in the top 20! Let's change that! ;-)
>
> >Time Magazine is allowing us to vote for Time Magazines
> >Person of the Century, which will be in their December 1999 issue.
> > To vote go to:
>
Hey, Linus Torvalds isn't even in the top 20! Let's change that! ;-)
>Time Magazine is allowing us to vote for Time Magazines
>Person of the Century, which will be in their December 1999 issue.
> To vote go to:
>http://www.pathfinder.com/time/time100/toppersonmain.html
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 08:25:30AM -0400, Mike Barton wrote:
> >Just to add my experiences of win95 into the frey, i have also done the
> MB
> >swap thing and while after a lot of rebooting in managed to recover, on
> the
> >other hand my bro's machine is almost identical to mine (only minor
> >dif
>Just to add my experiences of win95 into the frey, i have also done the
MB
>swap thing and while after a lot of rebooting in managed to recover, on
the
>other hand my bro's machine is almost identical to mine (only minor
>differences lijke graphics card, HD make) failed miserable to survive
the
>s
On 02-Aug-98 Steve Lamb wrote:
> My secret is that I do not run Microsoft applications. I find that the
> applications are shoddy, poorly written, thought out, implimented and are
> often incompatible with themselves in their own versions.
>
> I run Win95 for games written by other soft
Just to add my experiences of win95 into the frey, i have also done the MB
swap thing and while after a lot of rebooting in managed to recover, on the
other hand my bro's machine is almost identical to mine (only minor
differences lijke graphics card, HD make) failed miserable to survive the
same s
On Sun, 2 Aug 1998 01:37:43 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Why? I didn't have to update the drivers of Linux. It came up and running.
>Win95 on the other hand kept on insisting on rebooting the system for each
>"updated driver".
Sure you do. It is just called recompiling the kernel.
On Sun, Aug 02, 1998 at 01:37:43AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ok, let's talk a concrete example: I loaded "Barney on the farm" for my
> daughter (Official MS Win95 game for children). The setup routine got to the
> "Parent's Room" segment of the installation. I was not given a choice as t
On Sun, 2 Aug 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, let's talk a concrete example: I loaded "Barney on the farm" for my
> daughter (Official MS Win95 game for children). The setup routine got to the
> "Parent's Room" segment of the installation. I was not given a choice as to
> whether or not I wan
Steve Lamb writes:
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 1998 at 12:03:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ever try replacing a Motherboard on a "win95" system?
>
> Yes. In fact, I swapped machines around the HDs to test a theory of
> mine.
>
> > That "fabulous, great, decent OS" loses it's mind! You se
On 07/31/98 at 10:36 AM, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Apparently you're doing something wrong. Because this *LINUX*
>advocate has a Win95/WinNT machine at home that rivals the uptimes of
>my Linux box. I have yet to lose data on that machine because of the
>OS, same as my Linux box
My experience also with Windows 95 has been pretty solid. I've had
months of uptime with Windows 95 with the only problems being occasional
GPF errors that close all open Netscape windows. But other than that
it's been pretty rock solid for me as long as I haven't installed
library type software or
On Fri, Jul 31, 1998 at 12:03:58PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ever try replacing a Motherboard on a "win95" system?
Yes. In fact, I swapped machines around the HDs to test a theory of
mine.
> That "fabulous, great, decent OS" loses it's mind! You see, all
> information about the hardw
Please allow me my two cents of experience with Lost95 (if they don't 'Win',
they 'lost')
C.J.LAWSON writes:
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Alexander wrote:
> > Well, Windows is a decent OS if you know how to use and configure it right
> > (and work around its many bugs). If you can't deal with bugs i
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Alexander wrote:
> Well, Windows is a decent OS if you know how to use and configure it right
> (and work around its many bugs). If you can't deal with bugs in an OS you
> don't deserve to be allowed to use a computer, or even own one. Windows
I wonder if you would have the sam
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 08:06:40AM -0700, Alexander wrote:
> Hi...
>
> Well, Windows is a decent OS if you know how to use and configure it right
> (and work around its many bugs). If you can't deal with bugs in an OS you
> don't deserve to be allowed to use a computer, or even own one. Windows
>
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Alexander wrote:
> Hi...
Hello!
> Do you think MS took only 5 minutes to design and implement the UI? Or
> FAT32? I don't think so.
Speaking of UI check this out.
http://www.insanely-great.com/Interface
maybe this will convince you that MS took 5 minutes or less to imple
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Alexander wrote:
> Hi...
>
> Well, Windows is a decent OS if you know how to use and configure it right
> (and work around its many bugs). If you can't deal with bugs in an OS you
> don't deserve to be allowed to use a computer, or even own one. Windows
> took many years to d
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, David Parmet wrote:
>
>
> Linus on the cover of this weeks Forbes!
Do you slashdot?
I do and I had the slashdot effect when I tried to connect to Forbes.com
HTTP/1.0 Server too busy hhrrmpp.
/\ Richard L. Alhama, Technical Support
/vvv
Linus on the cover of this weeks Forbes!
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: debian-user
> Subject: Re: Linus Torvalds interview
> Resent-Date: 22 Jul 1998 18:01:52 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
&
f them...)
Alex
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:43:20 +0100
> From: Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user
> Subject: Re: Linus Torvalds interview
> Resent-Date: 22 Jul 1998 17:47:40 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@
nifesto.html
> >
> > If that's the one I've seen it is well worth reading. Linux has his head
>
> Linux the OS or Linus the person? Do you mean that what LT says goes for
> the linux community as well?
Oops :-) No - but he generally behaves responsibly by avoiding
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 04:19:17PM -0700, Keith Beattie wrote:
> > fyi,
> >
> > http://www.bootnet.com/youaskedforit/lip_linux_manifesto.html
>
> If that's the one I've seen it is well worth reading. Linux ha
On Tue, Jul 21, 1998 at 04:19:17PM -0700, Keith Beattie wrote:
> fyi,
>
> http://www.bootnet.com/youaskedforit/lip_linux_manifesto.html
If that's the one I've seen it is well worth reading. Linux has his head
screwed on right (apart from the "I don't think Microsoft is an evil
company" bit which
fyi,
http://www.bootnet.com/youaskedforit/lip_linux_manifesto.html
ksb
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Beattie) writes:
> I have recently read a magazine about linux, and it mentioned the world's
> first "knowing" of linux; A 1991 post to comp.os.minix from Linus
> Torvalds. Would anyone have any idea if this is available, or even if it
>
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 11:29:43PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > I have recently read a magazine about linux, and it mentioned the world's
> > first "knowing" of linux; A 1991 post to comp.os.minix from Linus
> &
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> I have recently read a magazine about linux, and it mentioned the world's
> first "knowing" of linux; A 1991 post to comp.os.minix from Linus
> Torvalds. Would anyone have any idea if this is available, or even if it
> was s
In debian-user Michael Beattie wrote:
>I have recently read a magazine about linux, and it mentioned the world's
>first "knowing" of linux; A 1991 post to comp.os.minix from Linus
>Torvalds.
Do you yearn for the days when men were men, and wrote their own
device driver
On Thu, Apr 30, 1998 at 11:29:43PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> I have recently read a magazine about linux, and it mentioned the world's
> first "knowing" of linux; A 1991 post to comp.os.minix from Linus
> Torvalds.
A number of early Linux posts from Linus are availa
I have recently read a magazine about linux, and it mentioned the world's
first "knowing" of linux; A 1991 post to comp.os.minix from Linus
Torvalds. Would anyone have any idea if this is available, or even if it
was saved? Or even where I could start to look for it?
Sheesh..
> Please drop personal attacks, especially vapid ones, from the lists.
Supported!!
-J.
===
In any war, the first casualty is the truth.
ected ..' -LJKS
at least extend the man the curtsey of getting his name right
> Voting for Linus Tolrvalds is not a good idea. The man is not a Titan,
Linus Torvalds
-J.
===
In any war, the first ca
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Tamas Papp wrote:
> > I don't think 'debian-flame' would be quite appropriate. How about
> > debian-discussion, or debian-advocacy or something?
> It's a good idea, "flame" was just a thought (after the Hungarian list
> linux-flame). The name debian-discussion would be quite
> I don't think 'debian-flame' would be quite appropriate. How about
> debian-discussion, or debian-advocacy or something?
It's a good idea, "flame" was just a thought (after the Hungarian list
linux-flame). The name debian-discussion would be quite appropriate for
the topics that I mentioned. So
I don't think 'debian-flame' would be quite appropriate. How about
debian-discussion, or debian-advocacy or something?
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Tamas Papp wrote:
> This is getting to be a bit offtopic. Some linux lists have a "fl
> > Voting for Linus Tolrvalds is not a good idea. The man is not a Titan,
> > in any sense of the word... even less than Bill Gates.
> >
> > Making such silly votes, is sure to disrubt the balance and help put
> > Bill Gates up on the list, or is *t
This is getting to be a bit offtopic. Some linux lists have a "flame"
counterpart specifically for these issues, i.e. the ones that are not
technical. Couldn't we start a debian-flame list for these debates? The
people who are interested in these could sign up for that.
jabberwock
###By lack
David Densmore wrote:
>
> When it was suggested that we all go to the Pathfinder web site and
> vote for Linus as man of the century, it struck me as a very good
> idea and I did so immediately.
>
> Personally, I think the idea of picking one person to stand out above
> a
this poor rating!
> >howard hughes 351237 4.09
> >vehbi koc 350473 4.08
> >steve jobs 336439 3.92
> >murat arslan 205791 2.40
> >
> Voting for Linus Tolrvalds is not a good idea. The man is not a Titan,
> in any sense of the word... even less th
Hi,
>>"Orn" == Orn E Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Orn> Þann 12-Apr-98 skrifar Manoj Srivastava:
>> Frankly, most of us have sense enough not to tell people how their
>> vbotes are wrong. It is one thing to campaign for a candidate, and
>> urge and suggest where to cast ones vote, and it is
Manoj wrote:
> Hmm. Those terms are generally used by the intellectually
> challenged. I shall make a note your affliction, and I offer you my
> sympathies. I shall also attempt to down grade any communication to
> you to words of one syllable, so that you may actually understand the
> s
Hi,
>>"Orn" == Orn E Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Orn> Well, like it or not... your votes are silly. And that's
Orn> probably why Linux people are so often described as geeks. If
Orn> you don't like it, then you should try be non-geek like... but
Orn> since you do like, accept being called
Hi,
>>"Orn" == Orn E Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Orn> Look whose talking... the King of Geek world, as the magazines so
Orn> well describe it :-)
Orn> You want to continue to be a geek, be my guest :-)
Hmm. Those terms are generally used by the intellectually
challenged. I shall
On Mon, Apr 13, 1998 at 10:03:53PM +0200, Orn E. Hansen wrote:
>
> Þann 12-Apr-98 skrifar Marcus Brinkmann:
> >> Yes, he is. I don't think that many of the voters take seriously what
> >> they're doing. :-)
> >
> > If the would, Bill Gates wouldn't get so many votes...
> >
> You'd be surprised
On Mon, 13 Apr 1998, Orn E. Hansen wrote:
:
: Þann 12-Apr-98 skrifar Manoj Srivastava:
: >
: > anal jokes? "hots"? What kind of deranged reality is this
: > coming from?
: >
: Look whose talking... the King of Geek world, as the magazines so
: well describe it :-)
:
: You want to co
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
