> Sven - who is desparate to run 2.4.0
#
# Multi-device support (RAID and LVM)
#
CONFIG_MD=y
# CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD is not set
# CONFIG_MD_LINEAR is not set
# CONFIG_MD_RAID0 is not set
# CONFIG_MD_RAID1 is not set
# CONFIG_MD_RAID5 is not set
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LVM=y
CONFIG_LVM_PROC_FS=y
try to leave t
ยป Joris Lambrecht said this and I say that:
> This guy is in deep trouble guys, try helping him out ...
>
> Apperently i couldn't help him
Count me in this trouble too. My guess is that it's something
about modules - I compiled two 2.4 test12 kernels - one of them had
_almost_ everythin
This guy is in deep trouble guys, try helping him out ...
Apperently i couldn't help him
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Cheong Shu Yang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 2:12 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.0 & root fs problem
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:42:02PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote:
> To quote Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
> # install Linux without ext2 support?
> # I have always wondered why the option was given.
>
> ReiserFS/ext3: Some peo
> "Pollywog" == Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I simply used the configurations for my 2.2.18 kernel and
>> then did a > "make oldconfig". > So, yes, I did select ext2
>> support built-in, as I did in 2.2.18.
Pollywog> I wonder why this is even an option; is there
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 01:19:41PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> Well, it's a pain but I'd go through the config the old-fashioned way,
> eg.:
>
> make clean
> make-kpkg clean
> make distclean
> make (xconfig|config|menuconfig)
> make-kpkg
>
> Something ob
To quote Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
# install Linux without ext2 support?
# I have always wondered why the option was given.
A number of reasons;
Embedded applications: typical "embedded" applications are *extremely*
memory
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 08:36:54PM +, Pollywog wrote:
> I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
> install Linux without ext2 support?
> I have always wondered why the option was given.
In a word: choice. Before ext2 there was the original ext. Or was it
called ext
> > I simply used the configurations for my 2.2.18 kernel and then did a
> > "make oldconfig".
> > So, yes, I did select ext2 support built-in, as I did in 2.2.18.
I wonder why this is even an option; is there a reason anyone would
install Linux without ext2 support?
I have always wondered why
"Sven Burgener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> > > VFS: Cannot open root device "803" or 08:03
> > > Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> > > Kernel panic: VFS:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 02:13:25PM -0500, Bob Billson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> > VFS: Cannot open root device "803" or 08:03
> > Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03
>
> Did you remember
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:07:00PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> "Sven Burgener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just to clarify:
> > > $ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18
> > > Root device /dev/sda3
> >
> > (Booting with 2.2.18 works)
> >
> > > $ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.0
> > > Root device /dev/sda3
> >
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> VFS: Cannot open root device "803" or 08:03
> Please append a correct "root=" boot option
> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03
Did you remember to say 'yes' *not* 'module' for ext2 support in the kernel
(under Genera
"Sven Burgener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to clarify:
>
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> > $ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18
> > Root device /dev/sda3
>
> (Booting with 2.2.18 works)
>
> > $ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.0
> > Root device /dev/sda3
>
> ... but not
Just to clarify:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:35:08PM +0100, Sven Burgener wrote:
> $ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.2.18
> Root device /dev/sda3
(Booting with 2.2.18 works)
> $ rdev /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.0
> Root device /dev/sda3
... but not with 2.4.0.
Thanks in advance!
Sven
Hello
After having built and installed my custom linux-2.4.0-deb, I get the
following when booting:
[boot msgs]
VFS: Cannot open root device "803" or 08:03
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 08:03
After which booting halts.
$ rdev /boot/vml
16 matches
Mail list logo
