On 02/11/2012 02:14 PM, lina wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>> On 11/02/12 22:53, lina wrote:
>>> Right now updating I notice the install of linux-source 3.2
>>>
>>> my question is that:
>>>
>>> 1] will it install on /
>>> my / has reached 83%
>>
>> Maybe, depend
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 11/02/12 22:53, lina wrote:
>> Right now updating I notice the install of linux-source 3.2
>>
>> my question is that:
>>
>> 1] will it install on /
>> my / has reached 83%
>
> Maybe, depends on your partitioning.
> If you have only the on
On 11/02/12 22:53, lina wrote:
> Right now updating I notice the install of linux-source 3.2
>
> my question is that:
>
> 1] will it install on /
> my / has reached 83%
Maybe, depends on your partitioning.
If you have only the one partition - yes.
(mount will tell you)
7% of free space "could"
Right now updating I notice the install of linux-source 3.2
my question is that:
1] will it install on /
my / has reached 83%
2] I have installed kernel 3.2.5
is it necessary to have 3.2?
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 23:50, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> Hi Eric
>
> Sorry for the late answer. But I don't have the time to check the
> messages on debian-user more often.
>
> On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 15:03, Eric Dickner wrote:
> > I am trying to compile some .src.rpm files. When
> > I try to do th
Hi Eric
Sorry for the late answer. But I don't have the time to check the
messages on debian-user more often.
On Sat, 2004-09-18 at 15:03, Eric Dickner wrote:
> I am trying to compile some .src.rpm files. When
> I try to do this they look for headers under the
> /usr/src/linux link. I installed
--- Andrea Vettorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> If you
> need some kernel
> header files you'll probably find them installing
> kernel-headers
> packages.
>
>
> Andrea
>
Yeah, putting that empty directory there only made it
insist on specific files. That at least led me to the
proper pack
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 21:16:03 -0400, Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:10:46 -0700, Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
> >>>What am I missing here, besides these .h
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:10:46 -0700, Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
What am I missing here, besides these .h files?
Nothing.
How to cope:
# mkdir /usr/src/linux
# mkdir /usr/src/linux/include
This is on
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:10:46 -0700, Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
> > I am trying to compile some .src.rpm files. When
> > I try to do this they look for headers under the
> > /usr/src/linux link. I installed linux from CD'
--- Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nothing.
>
> How to cope:
>
>
> # mkdir /usr/src/linux
> # mkdir /usr/src/linux/include
>
> Now the apps -I/usr/src/linux/include won't do
> anything, but they will
> still find the kernel headers because a set of
> known-good kernel
> headers
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 06:03:01AM -0700, Eric Dickner wrote:
> I am trying to compile some .src.rpm files. When
> I try to do this they look for headers under the
> /usr/src/linux link. I installed linux from CD's
> originally and they didn't put anything there...I
> don't even have that link.
>
I am trying to compile some .src.rpm files. When
I try to do this they look for headers under the
/usr/src/linux link. I installed linux from CD's
originally and they didn't put anything there...I
don't even have that link.
I downloaded a source kernel from kernel.org and many
of the instructions
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 04:25:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded a copy of the Linux 2.4.7 sources as a tar-gz file, and I
> suppose I need to install them into /usr/src. However, the tar-gz's contents
> are not at all indicative of that, and doing a make config just gives me a
on Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 10:44:56PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 16:25:55 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I downloaded a copy of the Linux 2.4.7 sources as a tar-gz file, and I
> > suppose I need to install them into /usr/src. However, the tar
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 16:25:55 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded a copy of the Linux 2.4.7 sources as a tar-gz file, and I
> suppose I need to install them into /usr/src. However, the tar-gz's contents
> are not at all indicative of that, and doing a make config just gives me a
>
I downloaded a copy of the Linux 2.4.7 sources as a tar-gz file, and I
suppose I need to install them into /usr/src. However, the tar-gz's contents
are not at all indicative of that, and doing a make config just gives me a
bunch of questions to set up a kernel. Do I just make a kernel from this
17 matches
Mail list logo
