On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 11:46 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> There must be some multi-millionaires who are blind!!
It's new technology, not really for the masses. In 100 years and perhaps
earlier it could be less expensive or completely removed from the
market, hence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cochlear_impl
On 12/06/11 20:46, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 11 June 2011 16:42:12 Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> [snipped]
That is not sarcasm incidentally. I would genuinely like to know how
you can use braille to read things on the Internet.
>>
>> http://en
On 12/06/11 20:46, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 11 June 2011 16:42:12 Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> [snipped]
That is not sarcasm incidentally. I would genuinely like to know how
you can use braille to read things on the Internet.
>>
>> http://en
On Saturday 11 June 2011 16:42:12 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
[snipped]
> >> That is not sarcasm incidentally. I would genuinely like to know how
> >> you can use braille to read things on the Internet.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refreshable_Brail
2011/6/11 Anthony Campbell :
> On 11 Jun 2011, darkestkhan wrote:
>>
>> Maybe it is time for big revolution in English language of XXI century
>> - the revival of pronoun "one".
>> For one thing, I'm still encountering pronoun "one", and it is quite
>> often, so I wouldn't be so hasty to this judgm
Excerpts from Lisi's message of 2011-06-11 12:43:23 +0200:
> On Saturday 11 June 2011 11:07:36 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > > On Saturday 11 June 2011 10:05:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > I've good luck, because I can skip a lot when watching at the mon
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 17:33 +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 11 Jun 2011, darkestkhan wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it is time for big revolution in English language of XXI century
> > - the revival of pronoun "one".
> > For one thing, I'm still encountering pronoun "one", and it is quite
> > often, so
On Sb, 11 iun 11, 11:13:50, darkestkhan wrote:
>
> Maybe it is time for big revolution in English language of XXI century
> - the revival of pronoun "one".
> For one thing, I'm still encountering pronoun "one", and it is quite
> often, so I wouldn't be so hasty to this judgment of effective death
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 01:42 +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 11/06/11 20:07, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> >> On Saturday 11 June 2011 10:05:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >>> I've good luck, because I can skip a lot when watching at the monitor, I
> >>> guess
On 11 Jun 2011, darkestkhan wrote:
>
> Maybe it is time for big revolution in English language of XXI century
> - the revival of pronoun "one".
> For one thing, I'm still encountering pronoun "one", and it is quite
> often, so I wouldn't be so hasty to this judgment of effective death
> (though it
On 11/06/11 20:07, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>> On Saturday 11 June 2011 10:05:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> I've good luck, because I can skip a lot when watching at the monitor, I
>>> guess using braille, people have to read much more irrelevant stuff.
>>
>
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 11:43 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 11 June 2011 11:07:36 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > > On Saturday 11 June 2011 10:05:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > I've good luck, because I can skip a lot when watching at the monitor,
> > >
2011/6/11 Lisi :
> On Saturday 11 June 2011 11:07:36 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> [snip]
>> > That is not sarcasm incidentally. I would genuinely like to know how you
>> > can use braille to read things on the Internet.
>>
>> A misunderstanding, perhaps regarding to my broken English.
>
> No, I fully und
On Saturday 11 June 2011 11:07:36 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 June 2011 10:05:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > I've good luck, because I can skip a lot when watching at the monitor,
> > > I guess using braille, people have to read much more ir
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 10:27 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 11 June 2011 10:05:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > I've good luck, because I can skip a lot when watching at the monitor, I
> > guess using braille, people have to read much more irrelevant stuff.
>
> I'm fascinated. How do you read braille
15 matches
Mail list logo