On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:16 -0600, lee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:26:37PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
[snip]
Moreover you're quoting my hint to the link there. Look into
debian-devel archives, I won't repeat myself.
Yeah, sure, I'm going to browse through the archives of d-d
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:16 -0600, lee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:26:37PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
[snip]
Moreover you're quoting my hint to the link there. Look into
debian-devel archives, I won't repeat
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 23:04 -0600, lee wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Look at the Received: headers in my mails, afaict winnegan.fake is no
valid domain outside my lan and using outside would provoke harsh
reactions.
Look at my headers: who
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:23:28AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2009-07-24 00:04, lee wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
[snip]
Look at the Received: headers in my mails, afaict winnegan.fake is no
valid domain outside my lan and using outside would
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:10:16AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 23:04 -0600, lee wrote:
Look at my headers: who cares? Unless you're an ISP or MSP or run the
servers for a company, nobody is going to mind.
That's wrong, as with HTTP and other text based protocols
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 00:57 -0600, lee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:10:16AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
[SNIP]
Well, this was my last post in this thread, I'll grant you the final
word if you care, maybe you can prove that Exim's FAQ 805 or 807 iirc
the link is on d-d - is wrong.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:26:37PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 00:57 -0600, lee wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:10:16AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
[SNIP]
Well, this was my last post in this thread, I'll grant you the final
word if you care, maybe you can
Oops, this one slipped by me since I have moved the question to
d-devel, sorry for not Ccing d-user.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:10 -0600, lee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Here's the question again: which one of the abundance of MTAs in
Debian is
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Oops, this one slipped by me since I have moved the question to
d-devel, sorry for not Ccing d-user.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:10 -0600, lee wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Here's
On 2009-07-24 00:04, lee wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
[snip]
Look at the Received: headers in my mails, afaict winnegan.fake is no
valid domain outside my lan and using outside would provoke harsh
reactions.
Look at my headers: who cares? Unless
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Here's the question again: which one of the abundance of MTAs in
Debian is capable of address rewriting depending on destination?
Exim4 can do this.
If I understand you right, you want to rewrite the addresses of mail
that is
Hi List,
to start with, it's not a vital problem, I only want to fix sth
annoying me.
As quite a number among you, I'm running a LAN connected to
the big world via switched ADSL.
I'm looking for a MTA that is capable of rewriting addresses
*only* on mails that leave the LAN.
In general I'm
On 2009-07-21 06:03, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
Hi List,
to start with, it's not a vital problem, I only want to fix sth
annoying me.
As quite a number among you, I'm running a LAN connected to
the big world via switched ADSL.
I'm looking for a MTA that is capable of rewriting addresses
*only* on
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 06:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
Either you or I have misconfigured Postfix, because internal email
comes to me as $u...@haggis.homelan, ...
Must be you, did you look at the Received: headers in my message?
I looked at yours, no Postfix involved up to
On 2009-07-21 07:05, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 06:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
Either you or I have misconfigured Postfix, because internal email
comes to me as $u...@haggis.homelan, ...
Must be you, did you look at the Received: headers in my message?
I looked at
15 matches
Mail list logo
