-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:06:14PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
[...]
> Hey tomas! You are always welcome!
> There is no issue in here for your commests.
Just take this as my personal opinion. Others may disagree.
In any case thank you very
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 06:36:53PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Morten Bo Johansen a écrit :
> > Since you are using Mutt, all you need to do to be well behaved
> > (i.e. not send personal CCs) is to hit 'L' when you reply
>
> As I already explained twice, a
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:17 AM Morten Bo Johansen wrote:
> On 2016-06-13 Nicolas George wrote:
>
> > As I already explained twice, a solution that requires a
> > different action when it is a mailing-list and when it is not
> > is not an acceptable solution.
>
> Why not? Don't
On Monday 13 June 2016 12:39:31 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 13 June 2016 17:36:53 Nicolas George wrote:
> > Solution 2: A makes the moderate punctual effort to configure the
> > MUA to set the header correctly and directly reaps the benefits.
> >
> > Stated like that, it is pretty much a
On 2016-06-13 Nicolas George wrote:
> As I already explained twice, a solution that requires a
> different action when it is a mailing-list and when it is not
> is not an acceptable solution.
Why not? Don't you know when you are corresponding on a mailing
list or not? You only need to switch
On Monday 13 June 2016 17:36:53 Nicolas George wrote:
> Solution 2: A makes the moderate punctual effort to configure the MUA to
> set the header correctly and directly reaps the benefits.
>
> Stated like that, it is pretty much a no-brainer.
Except that you are continuing to refuse to explain
Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Morten Bo Johansen a écrit :
> Since you are using Mutt, all you need to do to be well behaved
> (i.e. not send personal CCs) is to hit 'L' when you reply
As I already explained twice, a solution that requires a different action
when it is a mailing-list and
On 2016-06-13 Nicolas George wrote:
> Le quintidi 25 prairial, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
>> I expect you to conform to the CoC and not continue to reply to me
>> personally.
>
> Nobody can be expected to remember the personal preferences of each
> mailing-list member, nor the subscription
On Monday 13 June 2016 15:17:19 Nicolas George wrote:
> Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > I appreciate that. Thank you. But it isn't just my personal
> > preferences, it is part of the CoC:
>
> And the mail headers state differently. Given contradictory directives, I
>
Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> I appreciate that. Thank you. But it isn't just my personal preferences, it
> is part of the CoC:
And the mail headers state differently. Given contradictory directives, I
explained in my previous mail why the only sane solution is to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 09:34:06PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote:
> On 2016년 6월 13일 오후 8시 52분 49초 GMT+09:00, Lisi Reisz
> wrote:
> >On Monday 13 June 2016 10:57:05 Nicolas George wrote:
> >> [...]
> >"When replying to
On Monday 13 June 2016 10:57:05 Nicolas George wrote:
> This time only, as a particular courtesy, I have edited manually the list
> of recipients to adhere to your personal preferences.
I appreciate that. Thank you. But it isn't just my personal preferences, it
is part of the CoC:
"When
Le quintidi 25 prairial, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> I expect you to conform to the CoC and not continue to reply to me personally.
Nobody can be expected to remember the personal preferences of each
mailing-list member, nor the subscription status of all contributors, and
more importantly
13 matches
Mail list logo