On 2006-07-11, Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How good is the inverse function (ripping the CD tracks back to WAV)?
>
> If your disks scratch, then you may lose information; also take into
> consideration the expected life of your media.
I think backup copies are the solution then.
On 2006-07-11, Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam Funk wrote:
>
>>I made digital copies of an old record by connecting my hi-fi line
>>output to my sound input and using Audacity to record the tracks (and
>>edit them slightly) and save them as "RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE
>>audio, Microso
Adam Funk wrote:
I made digital copies of an old record by connecting my hi-fi line
output to my sound input and using Audacity to record the tracks (and
edit them slightly) and save them as "RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE
audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, stereo 44100 Hz" files,
Have you tried g
Adam Funk on 2006-07-11 13:28:30 +0100:
> How good is the inverse function (ripping the CD tracks back to WAV)?
If your disks scratch, then you may lose information; also take into
consideration the expected life of your media.
> Is there any loss of information in burning the files to CD?
I do
I made digital copies of an old record by connecting my hi-fi line
output to my sound input and using Audacity to record the tracks (and
edit them slightly) and save them as "RIFF (little-endian) data, WAVE
audio, Microsoft PCM, 16 bit, stereo 44100 Hz" files, which I then
burnt to a CD with `cdrec
5 matches
Mail list logo
