Adam Aube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's another side of the problem. However, my original point still
> stands - blacklisting by small sites (even in large numbers) is
> unlikely to have much of an impact on the large broadband providers
> who do nothing about the garbage spewing from their
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Adam Aube wrote:
>> "If several large sites wholesale blacklisted major broadband providers"
>
>> Emphasis on "large" - it would take several sites approaching the size of
>> AOL or MSN to make a difference.
>
> You mean the very same companies that are perpetuating the b
Adam Aube wrote:
> "If several large sites wholesale blacklisted major broadband providers"
> Emphasis on "large" - it would take several sites approaching the size of
> AOL or MSN to make a difference.
You mean the very same companies that are perpetuating the behavior
themselves as well as
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Increase? What increase? What spam?
> http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/config_docs/antispam_postfix/
Apparently at:
http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/config_docs/antispam-postfix/
Bob
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on Thu, May 06, 2004 at 02:03:02PM -0700, Steve Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Adam Aube wrote:
> > Unfortunately, blacklisting is a much more realistic solution than
> > wholesale user education, so yes, blacklisting such providers is
> > probably the only workable solution.
>
> Unfortuna
on Thu, May 06, 2004 at 02:52:31PM -0700, Paul Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It reports spam to the usual suspects. Starting with postmaster/abuse
> > addresses, if known. Then IP / domain WHOIS contacts, abuse.net
> > contacts, and the
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 10:49:56AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:18:10AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> Spammer...
> >
> > *plonk*
>
> And once again you show the maturity of a spoiled six year old on an
> internationally distributed m
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Adam Aube wrote:
>> Unfortunately, blacklisting is a much more realistic solution than
>> wholesale user education, so yes, blacklisting such providers is probably
>> the only workable solution.
>
> Unfortunately the reality is unless the blacklisted each other it
> wouldn't w
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 10:49:56AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:18:10AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Whilst generally I wouldn't resort to flamage, your statement above
> >> > is of such grea
9 matches
Mail list logo
