On 12/12/13 08:32, Jean-Marc wrote:
Like PailNM said, not implemented in Microsoft O/S.
How come, everyone is thinking so?
Of course, it's implemented.
regards,
chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:49 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 12/12/13 18:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Ethan, still HTML, really ;)?
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 01:42 -0500, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com
wrote:
Are there any command line statement(s) that will enable the system to
use more than
On 12/12/2013 02:49 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Which distro ships a pae kernel with highmem64G *disabled* in the
default .config?
I can confirm both kernels on my up-to-date Debian Wheezy 32-bit install
have it enabled.
linux-image-3.2.0-4-486
linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae
I'm pretty sure
On 12/12/2013 02:41 AM, Christian Groessler wrote:
On 12/12/13 08:32, Jean-Marc wrote:
Like PailNM said, not implemented in Microsoft O/S.
How come, everyone is thinking so?
Of course, it's implemented.
regards,
chris
Check this:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 03:29 -0500, PaulNM wrote:
All Microsoft 32-bit consumer OS's are limited to 4GB RAM, if not
less.
IIRC 3.75 GiB, we already made the mistake and used the term GB instead
of GiB ;).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 12/12/13 19:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:49 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 12/12/13 18:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Ethan, still HTML, really ;)?
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 01:42 -0500, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com
wrote:
Are there any command line statement(s) that will
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 19:42 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
I wrote:
Why do so many people, with 64-bit architecture prefer 32-bit
operating systems?
Perhaps because 64-bit gives their use case brings disadvantage but no
advantages? Perhaps for other reasons. To assume that you *should*
On 12/12/2013 03:36 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 03:29 -0500, PaulNM wrote:
All Microsoft 32-bit consumer OS's are limited to 4GB RAM, if not
less.
IIRC 3.75 GiB, we already made the mistake and used the term GB instead
of GiB ;).
Well.
Whether GB instead of GiB is
On 12/12/2013 2:42 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
Perhaps because 64-bit gives their use case brings disadvantage but no
advantages? Perhaps for other reasons. To assume that you *should* use
64-bit in all cases is incorrect.
There are old 32 bit PAE only machines around with plenty of capability
On 12/12/2013 03:24 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:49 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 12/12/13 18:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Ethan, still HTML, really ;)?
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 01:42 -0500, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com
wrote:
Are there any command line statement(s) that
PaulNM grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 12/12/2013 02:11 AM, David Guntner wrote:
Scott Ferguson grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 12/12/13 17:42, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
Dear List -
I am running 32 bit sid with a pae kernel. What is the maximum RAM that
can be used
Jean-Marc grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 23:11:58 -0800
David Guntner da...@guntner.com wrote:
Really? As I understand it, a 32-bit operating system cannot address
more than 4G of memory.
What am I missing here?
Some more infos about PAE (Physical Address Extension):
Dear List -
I am running 32 bit sid with a pae kernel. What is the maximum RAM
that can be used? Are there any command line statement(s) that will
enable the system to use more than 4 GB of RAM?
TIA
Ethan
On 12/12/13 17:42, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
Dear List -
I am running 32 bit sid with a pae kernel. What is the maximum RAM that
can be used?
64GB
Are there any command line statement(s) that will enable
the system to use more than 4 GB of RAM?
n/a
TIA
Ethan
Kind
Scott Ferguson grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 12/12/13 17:42, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
Dear List -
I am running 32 bit sid with a pae kernel. What is the maximum RAM that
can be used?
64GB
Really? As I understand it, a 32-bit operating system cannot address
more than 4G
Ethan, still HTML, really ;)?
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 01:42 -0500, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com
wrote:
Are there any command line statement(s) that will enable the system to
use more than 4 GB of RAM?
Only when you compile a 32-bit architecture kernel, then you can enable
it by
echo
On 12/12/2013 02:11 AM, David Guntner wrote:
Scott Ferguson grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 12/12/13 17:42, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
Dear List -
I am running 32 bit sid with a pae kernel. What is the maximum RAM that
can be used?
64GB
Really? As I understand it, a 32
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 23:11 -0800, David Guntner wrote:
On 12/12/13 17:42, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
pae kernel
This ^
What am I missing here?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 23:11:58 -0800
David Guntner da...@guntner.com wrote:
Really? As I understand it, a 32-bit operating system cannot address
more than 4G of memory.
What am I missing here?
Some more infos about PAE (Physical Address Extension):
David Guntner wrote:
Scott Ferguson grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
I am running 32 bit sid with a pae kernel. What is the maximum RAM that
can be used?
64GB
Really? As I understand it, a 32-bit operating system cannot address
more than 4G
On 12/12/13 18:11, David Guntner wrote:
Scott Ferguson grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
On 12/12/13 17:42, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
Dear List -
I am running 32 bit sid with a pae kernel. What is the maximum RAM that
can be used?
64GB
Really?
Yes. Really. With few
On 12/12/13 18:24, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Ethan, still HTML, really ;)?
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 01:42 -0500, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com
wrote:
Are there any command line statement(s) that will enable the system to
use more than 4 GB of RAM?
Only when you compile a 32-bit architecture
22 matches
Mail list logo
