Re: Missing key

2017-12-11 Thread Michael Stone
ed for the Debian 8.9 oldstable point-release (due in about a month or so), which adds the missing key. I don't understand what oldstable has to do with it, but while upgrading to stretch, I am seeing the identical error message. I'll ignore it, but shouldn't it have been fixed? Did you upgrade the

Missing key

2017-12-11 Thread Tony van der Hoff
int-release (due in about a month or so), which adds the > missing key. I don't understand what oldstable has to do with it, but while upgrading to stretch, I am seeing the identical error message. I'll ignore it, but shouldn't it have been fixed?  

Re: Missing key issue

2010-07-12 Thread John W Foster
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 17:41 +0200, Wolodja Wentland wrote: On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 08:57 -0500, John W Foster wrote: Anyone know how to get rid of this issue. I,m getting this message with every reload of Synaptic. W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org squeeze Release: The

Missing key issue

2010-07-11 Thread John W Foster
Anyone know how to get rid of this issue. I,m getting this message with every reload of Synaptic. W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org squeeze Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907 Thanks John -- To

Re: Missing key issue

2010-07-11 Thread Wolodja Wentland
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 08:57 -0500, John W Foster wrote: Anyone know how to get rid of this issue. I,m getting this message with every reload of Synaptic. W: GPG error: http://www.debian-multimedia.org squeeze Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is

gpg randomly losing keys [was: Re: signature and missing key]

2003-06-24 Thread Pigeon
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:58:49PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:15:09PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:32:14PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: | With a dialup, it would be rather useful to be able to do this from the MTA | rather than the MUA.

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-23 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:15:09PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:32:14PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: | With a dialup, it would be rather useful to be able to do this from the MTA | rather than the MUA. True. | Unfortunately /usr/share/doc/exim/spec.txt.gz

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-18 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:32:14PM +0100, Pigeon wrote: | With a dialup, it would be rather useful to be able to do this from the MTA | rather than the MUA. True. | Unfortunately /usr/share/doc/exim/spec.txt.gz contains no references | to either gpg or pgp. Am I really out of luck for built-in

signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Marcelo Chiapparini
Hello, when reading some emails with Balsa, I get the following message: The signature could not be verified due to a missing key what does it mean and how can I fix it? TIA! Marcelo -- Marcelo Chiapparini DFT-IF/UERJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread eamon-roque
Hi! On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:57:22AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: Hello, when reading some emails with Balsa, I get the following message: The signature could not be verified due to a missing key You need to import the public key from the respective user. The Linux Kernel

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Marcelo Chiapparini
! On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:57:22AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: Hello, when reading some emails with Balsa, I get the following message: The signature could not be verified due to a missing key You need to import the public key from the respective user. The Linux Kernel Archives key

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:09:21AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: thank you for the answer!. Do I need to import the public key for *each* user? I am asking because many user of this list use this type of signature! Yes, you do. gpg can be configured to do this automatically

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Jeremy Brooks
some emails with Balsa, I get the following message: The signature could not be verified due to a missing key You need to import the public key from the respective user. The Linux Kernel Archives key can be imported with gnupg with the following command, for example: gpg --keyserver

Re: signature and missing key

2003-06-17 Thread Pigeon
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 11:09:21AM -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote: thank you for the answer!. Do I need to import the public key for *each* user? I am asking because many user of this list use this type of signature! Yes,

Missing key bindings

1999-07-05 Thread Chris
Hi. I've posted this before, but maybe some of you missed it... Anyway, my problem is that I am missing some very useful key bindings all of a sudden. Some of these include contol-alt-delete, control-k, control-f, control-w, and a number of others. Other bindings such as control-x and control-s