Re: Moved MAC addresses

2013-07-25 Thread M.Atıf CEYLAN
On 07/25/2013 06:56 PM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: "M.Atıf CEYLAN" writes: On 07/25/2013 03:14 AM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: You haven't said a lot about your topology; are both interfaces visible to the firewall through whatever series of switches you might have? Yes Actually, that pretty much has to b

Re: Moved MAC addresses

2013-07-25 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
"M.Atıf CEYLAN" writes: > On 07/25/2013 03:14 AM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: >> You haven't said a lot about your topology; are both interfaces visible >> to the firewall through whatever series of switches you might have? > Yes >> Actually, that pretty much has to be the case, otherwise your firewall >

Re: Moved MAC addresses

2013-07-24 Thread M.Atıf CEYLAN
On 07/25/2013 03:14 AM, Joe Pfeiffer wrote: You haven't said a lot about your topology; are both interfaces visible to the firewall through whatever series of switches you might have? Yes Actually, that pretty much has to be the case, otherwise your firewall couldn't see both MAC addresses. Th

Re: Moved MAC addresses

2013-07-24 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
"M.Atıf CEYLAN" writes: > Hi, > I have two debian servers. They have two interfaces on each server. > For example, > server1: > eth0  e8:b7:48:7b:35:f6 10.10.10.2 > eth1 is e8:b7:48:7b:35:f7   172.16.1.2 > > There is a pfsense firewall on frontend. PF syslogs contain below lines; > > kernel:

Moved MAC addresses

2013-07-24 Thread M.Atıf CEYLAN
Hi, I have two debian servers. They have two interfaces on each server. For example, server1: eth0 e8:b7:48:7b:35:f6 10.10.10.2 eth1 is e8:b7:48:7b:35:f7 172.16.1.2 There is a pfsense firewall on frontend. PF syslogs contain below lines; kernel: arp: *10.10.10.2* moved from e8:b7:48:7b:35