Reco wrote:
> Please don't do so. Ssh only provides SOCKS4 proxy, and SOCKS4 can not tunnel
> DNS requests (or any UDP traffic for that matter).
How old is your information on that? Even in Squeeze the man-page for
ssh says:
,
| Currently the SOCKS4 and SOCKS5 protocols are supported, and s
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:36:37AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
>
> > > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:
On Friday 19 June 2015 11:01:25 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> > On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
> > > Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:01:25 +0300
Reco wrote:
> >
> > When network.proxy.socks_remote_dns is set to true, the DNS
> > requests are sent through the SOCKS connection and delivered to
> > your computer at home (which ultimately is sent to your ISP but you
> > already thrust it with that informat
Hi.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:13:42AM +0200, Frederic Marchal wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
>
> > Hi.
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> >
>
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > > Mike McClain wrote:
>
> > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Ri
On Friday 19 June 2015 09:24:34 Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
>
> Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Mike McClain wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >> Scarletdown wrote:
> > >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and ser
Hi.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:20:25 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
> Mike McClain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> Scarletdown wrote:
> >>> How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
> >>
> >> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure
Mike McClain wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how thos
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:22:37PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Scarletdown wrote:
> >How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
>
> I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
> implications when using personal hotspot.
>
> >The
> >way I understand how those work, y
Jeremy Leonard wrote:
There is also a carrier called Ting that sells a wifi hotspot. The
billing is based on what you use and I've heard good things about them.
The wifi hotspot device can be found at https://ting.com/shop/Netgear-Zing
The cost structure is appropriate for my predicted usage.
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the US?
Yes
I
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
location.
You're in the US?
Yes
I
Scarletdown wrote:
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service?
I was leaning away from that solution - unsure of security
implications when using personal hotspot.
The
way I understand how those work, you will have your Internet
service with you no matter where you are, as lon
Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting
There is also a carrier called Ting that sells a wifi hotspot. The
billing is based on what you use and I've heard good things about them.
The wifi hotspot device can be found at https://ting.com/shop/Netgear-Zing
bald_bohemian
On 06/17/2015 12:58 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> physical location.
>
> I was assuming that meant connecting via cell
Hi Richard.
I faced a similar situation although a bit differently a few months ago.
The only WISP in the area announced they were shutting down the present
service which ran at 512 kbps and would offer upgrades to a new service
that runs 10 Mbps. Fine, but what they did not say officially was th
How about a portable wireless hotspot device and service? The way I
understand how those work, you will have your Internet service with you
no matter where you are, as long as you can get a signal from your provider.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one physical
> location.
>
You're in the US?
I'd suggest that a laptop
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:03:47AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
>
> I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> physical location.
>
> I was assuming that meant connecting via cel
Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
Mark Allums wrote:
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
On Wednesday 17 June 2015 17:11:11 Mark Allums wrote:
> On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
> > Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
> >
> > I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
> > physical location.
>
On 06/17/2015 11:03 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to one
physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
Wh
My connectivity for ~3 decades has been at <= 56k.
Current ISP abandoning that market ;/
I do not wish DSL, cable, nor satellite as they restrict me to
one physical location.
I was assuming that meant connecting via cell network.
Is that correct?
What questions should I be asking?
Please note
25 matches
Mail list logo
