Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-08 Thread Mario Vukelic
On 07 Aug 2001 20:49:37 +0100, P Kirk wrote: http://www.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html#keys -- Way way to technical for me. But thanks for the link. As promised, my stab at your problem: As you noted on the list, the link seems to point to UNIX configurations, but I guess that it works

Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread P Kirk
Hi all, I know this is the wrong forum but its actually where I'm most likely to get the correct answer. Mozilla is really good now. The only real annoyance is the keyboard mappings which are different from those in ie. The particular mapping that I really miss is Backspace to go back and

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread christophe barbé
That's look like a troll. Nice try. Le mar, 07 aoû 2001 16:59:12, P Kirk a écrit : Hi all, I know this is the wrong forum but its actually where I'm most likely to get the correct answer. Mozilla is really good now. The only real annoyance is the keyboard mappings which are different

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread P Kirk
You plainly haven't read it then. Take a quick glance and if you know about the key bindings, please do reply. -- Patrick No sig in my .sig Kirk GSM: +44 7876 560 646 ICQ: 42219699

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 03:59:12PM +0100, P Kirk wrote: Hi all, I know this is the wrong forum but its actually where I'm most likely to get the correct answer. Mozilla is really good now. The only real annoyance is the keyboard mappings which are different from those in ie. The

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread P Kirk
Sorry, don't know about changing Moz, but I certainly can use alt+left and alt+right with one hand the farthest apart I've seen those two keys is about five inches. I'm pretty sure most everyone can reach that far with one hand. five inches...you mean 12 centimetres? I should have said I was in

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread William Leese
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 20:20, Mike Fedyk wrote: On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 03:59:12PM +0100, P Kirk wrote: Hi all, I know this is the wrong forum but its actually where I'm most likely to get the correct answer. Mozilla is really good now. The only real annoyance is the keyboard

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread P Kirk
The /unix/ in the URL makes me wonder if its really a win2k resource. Besides, it seems to involve getting into the code. No thanks - still strugging with Python. -- Patrick No sig in my .sig Kirk GSM: +44 7876 560 646 ICQ: 42219699

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread Brendon Leese
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 22:06, you wrote: The /unix/ in the URL makes me wonder if its really a win2k resource. Besides, it seems to involve getting into the code. No thanks - still strugging with Python. er, well.. it works with all platforms i believe. atleast quite a few of the

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread Hall Stevenson
The /unix/ in the URL makes me wonder if its really a win2k resource. I'll bet that *some* of the things it details are cross-platform. I can't get mozilla to work with our MS Proxy at work, so I no longer have it installed (just uninstalled v0.9.3 on Friday...). I am certainly going to

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Brendon Leese wrote: On Tuesday 07 August 2001 22:06, you wrote: The /unix/ in the URL makes me wonder if its really a win2k resource. Besides, it seems to involve getting into the code. No thanks - still strugging with Python. er, well.. it

Re: Mozilla on win2k :-(

2001-08-07 Thread CaT
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 09:50:36PM +0200, William Leese wrote: this might help: http://www.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html Huzzah! This looks interesting. I've been getting way-too annoyed at having the key-bindings based on the ctrl key. Wonder if this will work with the menu items also.