Re: nfs problem

On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Glenn English wrote: > Come on folks! > > Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not > hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered > computer geek) == (surely > 0), no? > > OK.

Re: nfs problem

> On Jan 1, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Pier wrote: > > It was ages I didn't write to the list but nfs always arouse curiosity ;) > First try to force nfsv3 to see if permissions are ok (v3 uses numeric > uid/gid) with 'mount -o vers=3'. > If this works and you want to use nfsv4 then

Re: nfs problem

> On Jan 2, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Anders Andersson wrote: > > 1) Ditch webmin, I don't know what it is but it seems to break > something that should be pretty simple to set up, without giving any > feedback. Webmin's one of those web-based GUI admin things. I use it because it

Re: nfs problem

> On Jan 1, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Brandon Vincent wrote: > > I would return the server's idmapd.conf back to the default > configuration (nobody:nogroup) and make sure that the idmapd service > is running on both the server and the client. Make sure the domain > matches in

Re: nfs problem [FIXED?]

On 01/02/2016 10:06 AM, Glenn English wrote: Beats me, but it's working. I modified the line in /etc/exports (all on one line) to: /home/ghe/Finances 192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check) That isn't exactly as suggested, but there were mild complaints about not

Re: nfs problem

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:56 PM, ghe wrote: > I changed the nobody name to myself (ghe) in /etc/idmapd.conf, and created a > new user (gheqw). Now ls says the directory on the client is owned by > gheqw:nogroup. That doesn't make any sense to me at all. I would return the

Re: nfs problem

On Friday, 1 January 2016, 21:57, Glenn English wrote: Come on folks! Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered computer geek) == (surely > 0), no? OK. Leave

Re: nfs problem

Come on folks! Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered computer geek) == (surely > 0), no? OK. Leave out (date) and (% not hungover), and tell me what I've done wrong... > On Dec 31,

nfs problem

I'm trying to get NFS going with a Wheezy server and a Jessie client using Webmin and vi. It connects, but mounts the directory and file with nobody:nogroup as the user:group (and nobody isn't set to universe read/write -- tried to do that, but NFS won't let me). I see from the 'Net that this

Re : nfs problem

Strangely, putting a dns for the local zone (and forwarder for the rest) improves the situation. No cannot monitor in kern.log anymore ... De : Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com À : debian-user@lists.debian.org Envoyé le : Mardi 20 Septembre 2011 21h46 Objet : Re: nfs

nfs problem

Hello, I am encountering a problem with nfs on debian squeeze. I have messages like this in logs: lockd cannot monitor ip_address and also messages about statd But client ip are present in /etc/hosts. On the client the mount process works. The only problem is locking (application like

Re: nfs problem

Stephane Durieux wrote: I have messages like this in logs: lockd cannot monitor ip_address and also messages about statd The lockd: cannot monitor messages are due to the kernel being unable to communicate with the rpc.statd process. That usually indicates that the rpc.statd is not running,

Re: nfs problem

Kurian Thayil wrote: Hi, If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash in /etc/exports of B. It will be like, /home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash) You will be able to read-write as root if you include this option. This did not really work. To

Re: nfs problem

Hi, Machines A and B both run Debian. There are no firewall rules blocking any kind of traffic A--B. I try to mount, by means of nfs, a directory of B to a mount point on A, read-write. I can read the contents of /home/storage/video on B. But I cannot write anything to it. I keep getting

Re: nfs problem

Hi, If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash in /etc/exports of B. It will be like, /home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash) You will be able to read-write as root if you include this option. Regards, Kurian Mathew Thayil. On 10/30/08, Mirco Piccin

nfs problem

Machines A and B both run Debian. There are no firewall rules blocking any kind of traffic A--B. I try to mount, by means of nfs, a directory of B to a mount point on A, read-write. /etc/exports in B has: /home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check) /etc/fstab in A has: B:/home/storage/video

Re: NFS problem -- SOLVED!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alex Samad put me on the right track to the solution. See comments in line below. snip Other factors which may have a bearing on the situation: the BDS computer is a P4; whereas the SOL is a dual core on a Foxconn motherboard. Several other

Re: NFS problem -- SOLVED!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 And thanks also to Matthew M. -- sorry Matthew. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIkNNElNlJzOkJmTcRAi6IAJ92a316VPCAh0E47K4+J6wadeBCbgCggba9

Re: NFS problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that he (and others?) could help me. So, here is the information he asked me for, as well as the output of the

Re: NFS problem

Hello, You might try running $ exportfs -r on the host computer. MM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NFS problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 As Matthew Moore suggested, after reading the relevant manual page to see what command exportfs -r does, I ran on the server machine (SOL) exportfs -rv, which returned the following: exporting 192.168.0.0/24:/home/ken/mozilla exporting

Re: NFS problem

some thoughts inline On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:13:28PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that he (and others?)

NFS problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have two boxes, one normally used by user A, and the other by user B. I want to make it possible for user A to access his files from B's computer, and vice versa. So, in each computer I amended 1) file /etc/exports to export the relative

Re: NFS problem

Le lundi 28 juillet 2008, Ken Heard a écrit : I have two boxes, one normally used by user A, and the other by user B. I want to make it possible for user A to access his files from B's computer, and vice versa. So, in each computer I amended 1) file /etc/exports to export the relative

nfs problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nfs server 192.168.110.28 FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 2.2T 1.6T 473G 78% /home /etc/exports /home/nfs_for_217 192.168.110.27/255.255.255.255 (rw,sync,no_root_squash) nfs client Filesystem

Re: nfs problem

Ding Honghui wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 nfs server 192.168.110.28 FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 2.2T 1.6T 473G 78% /home /etc/exports /home/nfs_for_217 192.168.110.27/255.255.255.255 (rw,sync,no_root_squash) nfs

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

--- Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Stephane Durieux wrote: client - server -X- internet That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution . I have read that client and server must be able to make a reverse resolution of the client

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:47:14PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote: I have noticed that my clients are not declared in /etc/hosts if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis table to be useful) everything is find. Nevertheless I don t understand how the nfs can make a resolution via dns of a a

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

Stephane Durieux wrote: I have noticed that my clients are not declared in /etc/hosts They won't need to be if you use DNS. But it is acceptable to list them in the local files. Local files override network DNS. if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis table to be useful) everything is

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

--- Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: Stephane Durieux wrote: Of course the network connexion is good ! I can ping the server But you said that the server cannot access the network: I encounter a

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote: --- Douglas Allan Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] a ?crit I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories ! I think what he means is that:

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

Stephane Durieux wrote: client - server -X- internet That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution . I have read that client and server must be able to make a reverse resolution of the client and the server, but I am not sure of it and I don t

nfs problem while internet access broken

Hello I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories ! I have checked /etc/fstab nfs server is referenced by is ip /etc/nsswitch.conf files hosts dns nis /etc/host.conf order hosts, bind, nis (I would like to know

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote: Hello I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories ! in what way is network access broken? I have checked /etc/fstab nfs server is

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

--- Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote: Hello I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories ! in what way is network

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

Stephane Durieux wrote: Of course the network connexion is good ! I can ping the server But you said that the server cannot access the network: I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories ! This is a

Re: nfs problem while internet access broken

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: Stephane Durieux wrote: Of course the network connexion is good ! I can ping the server But you said that the server cannot access the network: I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has not access to

Re: dd NFS problem

Am 2006-05-15 19:25:43, schrieb Bjoern Schliessmann: Michelle Konzack wrote: Weil TCP fehlerkorrektur hat und UDP nicht Gibt's im UDP-Header plötzlich keine Prüfsumme mehr oder was genau meinst du damit? Genau. Fehlerhafte Pakete werden gedroped. Das ist genau der Grund, warum

Re: dd NFS problem

Michelle Konzack wrote: Weil TCP fehlerkorrektur hat und UDP nicht Gibt's im UDP-Header plötzlich keine Prüfsumme mehr oder was genau meinst du damit? Grüße, Björn -- BOFH excuse #176: vapors from evaporating sticky-note adhesives -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):

Re: dd NFS problem

Am 2006-05-09 16:05:54, schrieb Alexander Syring: Nicht wirklich weil ich lass meinen nfs jetzt auch Version 3 laufen muss keine option vers=3 angeben und tcp brauch ich auch nicht. NFS ist doch gut und schnell über udp warum soll ich dann tcp benutzen mit dem ganzen zurückgeschicke von

Re: dd NFS problem

Am 2006-05-03 19:46:28, schrieb Alexander Syring: Hi Liste ich hab ein Problem mit dd und nfs und zwar hab ich auf meinem laptop meinen desktoprechner per NFS in /mnt/opteron eingebunden. Nun möchte ich eine Partition von dem laptop komplett mit dd kopieren und gebe dazu ein: dd

Re: dd NFS problem

Am Sonntag, 7. Mai 2006 04:20 schrieb Michelle Konzack: Am 2006-05-03 19:46:28, schrieb Alexander Syring: Hi Liste ich hab ein Problem mit dd und nfs und zwar hab ich auf meinem laptop meinen desktoprechner per NFS in /mnt/opteron eingebunden. Nun möchte ich eine Partition von dem laptop

Re: dd NFS problem

Alexander Syring wrote: Hi Liste ich hab ein Problem mit dd und nfs und zwar hab ich auf meinem laptop meinen desktoprechner per NFS in /mnt/opteron eingebunden. Nun möchte ich eine Partition von dem laptop komplett mit dd kopieren und gebe dazu ein: dd if=/dev/hda4

Re: dd NFS problem (SOLVED)

Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2006 13:39 schrieb Bernd Schubert: Alexander Syring wrote: Welcher NFS Server, welche NFS Version? NFSv2 kann nur bis 2GB und der uralte Userspace Server kann nur NFSv2. Kernel-nfs und unfs3 können NFSv3. In /proc/mounts steht welche Protokollversion verwendet wird.

dd NFS problem

Hi Liste ich hab ein Problem mit dd und nfs und zwar hab ich auf meinem laptop meinen desktoprechner per NFS in /mnt/opteron eingebunden. Nun möchte ich eine Partition von dem laptop komplett mit dd kopieren und gebe dazu ein: dd if=/dev/hda4 of=/mnt/opteron/test.img so funktionier alles

Re: dd NFS problem

Hallo, Alexander Syring wrote: [...] dd if=/dev/hda4 of=/mnt/opteron/test.img so funktionier alles wunderbar bis die datei test.img genau 2GB groß ist und auf dem laptop die meldung steht die maximale dateigröße ist überschritten so jetzt hatte ich nfs im verdacht aber ich kann ohne

Re: dd NFS problem

Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2006 19:59 schrieb Moritz Lenz: ... Schuss ins Blaue: gib dd mal eine große Blocksize, z.B. dd bs=10M ... oder so, vielleicht sind es ja einfach zu viele Blocks. Grüße, Moritz Habs probiert macht aber leider wieder bei genau 2GB schluss mit der gleichen

Re: dd NFS problem

Hallo, Alexander Syring wrote: dd if=/dev/hda4 of=/mnt/opteron/test.img so funktionier alles wunderbar bis die datei test.img genau 2GB groß ist und auf dem laptop die meldung steht die maximale dateigröße ist überschritten [...] Also sollte es dann an dd liegen doch das ist es auch

Re: dd NFS problem

Wolf Wiegand wrote: dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/opteron/test.img bs=1K count=3GB ^^ Da sollte MB stehen. Wolf -- Kreuzigt mich - aber Debian ist einfach deppensicher. Es lässt Deppen gegen

Re: mounting DVDs via NFS problem

Have fixed the problem as NFS can't export UDF filesystems so mounted the DVD as ISO9660 and it worked. Will keep exportfs -a in mind though as sometimes it won't play back the DVD via NFS unless I play about with exportfs a lot. Thanks! Cheers - Piers Darryl Clarke wrote: On 21/01/06,

Re: mounting DVDs via NFS problem

Andrew, how can you mount a dvd over nfs if its not mounted on its local machine? Do these numbers above, as they come from destiny match the numbers if they are run on mythtv? IOW, are we looking at the same disk here? This bit is just to test if I can acutally mount it, i.e. I'm running

Re: mounting DVDs via NFS problem

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:29:50 + Piers Kittel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew, how can you mount a dvd over nfs if its not mounted on its local machine? Do these numbers above, as they come from destiny match the numbers if they are run on mythtv? IOW, are we looking at the same disk

Re: mounting DVDs via NFS problem

On 21/01/06, Piers Kittel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Am trying to mount a DVD drive via NFS and am having problems. For note, 192.168.1.2 (hostname - destiny) is the client and 192.168.1.15 (hostname - mythtv) is the server. I have this in my /etc/exports: /media/cdrom0

Re: mounting DVDs via NFS problem

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:04:25 + Piers Kittel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Am trying to mount a DVD drive via NFS and am having problems. For note, 192.168.1.2 (hostname - destiny) is the client and 192.168.1.15 (hostname - mythtv) is the server. I have this in my

mounting DVDs via NFS problem

Hello all, Am trying to mount a DVD drive via NFS and am having problems. For note, 192.168.1.2 (hostname - destiny) is the client and 192.168.1.15 (hostname - mythtv) is the server. I have this in my /etc/exports: /media/cdrom0 192.168.1.2(ro,sync) and 192.168.1.2 is in the

Re: NFS Problem? (Solved)

Hallo Allerseits, wie auch immer, ich habe aus meinem alten Ganten den Tip, bei Locking Problemen den NFS-Kernel-Server zu verwenden. Jetzt läufts, wenn auch die Performance des Kernel-Servers etwas schlechter ist. jetzt vom Am Samstag, 17. September 2005 16:58 schrieb Thomas Trueten: Hallo

NFS Problem?

Hallo Allerseits, ich komme hier mit einem Problem nicht weiter: Die /home Verzeichnisse liegen in meinem Netz auf einer XBOX. Diese läuft unter Xebian (Debian) Kernel 2.4.27 und werden per NFS exportiert. Auf den Clients läuft Debian (Knoppix 4.01, aktualisiert) mit Kernel 2.6.12

Re: NFS problem with debian installation

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Michael Gass wrote: I am having a problem with a debian install using nfs and a floppy boot. I am trying to install woody (bf2.4 flavor) on an old 486 with 24M ram (Compaq Prolinea 4/66). I am using PLIP as the machine has no network card and no cdrom. . nfs: server

NFS problem with debian installation

I am having a problem with a debian install using nfs and a floppy boot. I am trying to install woody (bf2.4 flavor) on an old 486 with 24M ram (Compaq Prolinea 4/66). I am using PLIP as the machine has no network card and no cdrom. This target machine is connected via PLIP to a source machine

OT: NFS Problem (Text file busy)

I'd put this on a Perl newsgroup, but when I Googled for more info, it came up that this is likely more of an NFS problem. I could not find anything that could actually tell me how to fix it, though. I have a server and a workstation. I'm using Kate (for those who don't use it, it's a KDE

Re: Bizarre NFS Problem

On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 19:52, Tim Kelley wrote: Have you looked at tcpdump output while this is happening? you might see some clues ... I have done a TCP dump and it seems to be just fine, nothing is different from a successful transfer then a failed transfer except at the point it fails. The

Re: Bizarre NFS Problem

On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 07:14, Ben Hutchings wrote: Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote: Hello All, I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done an apt-get update/upgrade on all my systems)

Re: Bizarre NFS Problem

On Tuesday 16 November 2004 08:45, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote: I know this is an old thread now, but I finally got a chance to try out the above. And while I was very hopeful in that it might work it still ended up with the same results. I don't know about everybody else but I am

Re: Bizarre NFS Problem

Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote: Hello All, I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done an apt-get update/upgrade on all my systems) when copying or creating a file on one of the NFS mounted

Bizarre NFS Problem

Hello All, I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done an apt-get update/upgrade on all my systems) when copying or creating a file on one of the NFS mounted directories I get an input/output error.

Re: Bizarre NFS Problem

On Thursday 04 November 2004 02:34, Derek \The Monkey\ Wueppelmann wrote: Hello All, I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done an apt-get update/upgrade on all my systems) when copying or

NFS problem

hallo, ich habe ein problem mit nfs. also zuerst zu meinem client system debian testing mit kernel 2.6.7. module die mit nfs zu tun haben könnten: nfs nfsd exportfslockd sunrpc folgende dienste sind gestartet: portmap rpc.mountd rpc.nfsd rpc.statd rpc.lockd server: Fedora Core 2 ohne änderungen

Re: NFS problem

Hallo GEORG, Am 2004-07-12 15:31:41, schrieb georg leugner: hallo, ich habe ein problem mit nfs. also zuerst zu meinem client system debian testing mit kernel 2.6.7. Es gibt auch GROSSBUCHSTABEN auf der Tastatur. Ich denke nicht, das hier irgendjemand allzuviel mit Deiner Beschreibung etwas

nfs-problem geht weiter...

Hallo, Da mein FileServer (3Ware Raid-5, 3xIBM 120 GByte) von ein paar Wochen zu klein wurde, habe ich einen zweiten 3Ware Controller mit drei 160 GByte zusätzlich eingebaut. Bin mit michelle danach umgezogen und soweit alles gut, mit Ausnahme von 'mutt' ! Der neue Plattensatz ist /home1

Re: nfs-problem geht weiter...

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:40:34 +0200 Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo, Hallo Michelle, 'mutt' hat seit dem umzug allerdings Probleme, wenn ich eine E-mail editieren will... __ / | Warte auf fcntl-Lock...

[SOLVED] Re: nfs-problem geht weiter...

Hallo, dachdem ich mit meinem Escalade und den Festplatten auf einen PII umgezogen bin, konnte ich meinen selbstkompilierten Kernel nicht mehr verwenden, weshalb ich den bf24 als default eingestellt habe. Ich mounte den nfs-Server mit der option tcp !!! Das wars ! Im standard bf24 kernel

More info (Was: NFS problem between Solaris Debian)

Here is more info: the client reports [EMAIL PROTECTED]nfsstat -rc Client rpc: Connection oriented: calls badcallsbadxids timeoutsnewcredsbadverfs 6838681 151128 3 297 0 0 timers cantconnnomem interrupts 0 680

nfs-Problem ?

Guten Morgen, seit gestern habe ich ein misteriöses Problem... Ich habe meine beiden homes (/home und /home1) seit ewigkeiten über über nfs gemounted und nie probleme gehabt. Nun habe ich, wenn ich mit mutt arbeite das problem, das ich keine E-Mails mehr editieren kann. Ich bekomme

Re: nfs-Problem ?

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:33:13AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote: | Warte auf fcntl-Lock... 1 2 3 4 | Konnte tempräre Mailbox nicht erzeugen: keine Berechtigung naja, steht doch da, das Locking macht Probleme. Kontrollier mal den rpc.lockd. Grüße, Torsten -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und

Re: nfs-Problem?

Hallo, sieht nach einem Probem mit dem locking aus. Welche Kernelversion verwendest Du? Hat sich die eventuell auch geaendert? Hatte neulich aehnliche Probleme... Verwendest Du den Kernel NFS oder User-Space NFS Daemon? Cheers, Jan -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):

Re: nfs-Problem?

Am 2004-04-01 11:04:15, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hallo, sieht nach einem Probem mit dem locking aus. Welche Kernelversion verwendest Du? Hat sich die eventuell auch geaendert? Hatte neulich aehnliche Probleme... Verwendest Du den Kernel NFS oder User-Space NFS Daemon? Mein FileServer

NFS problem between Solaris Debian

NFS problem. Server is a debian Sarge/testing box (kernel 2.4.25-1-386). Client is a solaris 8 box. This afternoon I started to see the following messages in the debian box's /var/log/kern.log: Apr 1 15:40:00 laurel kernel: rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: sent only -32 bytes of 8324 - shutting

Re: nfs problem

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:01:06 -0500, Vivek Kumar wrote: Hi, I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other machine. I am getting RPC error on other machine and it says (Host linux box) is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux box from there and also I can telnet

Re: nfs problem

BTW, is there still a way to mount a windows dirtree via nfs ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

nfs problem

Hi, I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other machine. I am getting RPC error on other machine and it says (Host linux box) is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux box from there and also I can telnet ot it. What is that I am missing. Any suggestion. Thanks --

Re: nfs problem

On Monday 27 October 2003 22:01, Vivek Kumar wrote: I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other machine. I am getting RPC error on other machine and it says (Host linux box) is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux box from there and also I can telnet ot it.

A little more on my nfs problem...

Also, some more stuff I've been noticing: 1) My understanding was that /var/lib/nfs/xtab was the file actually consulted by mountd to respond to an nfs mount request. Interestingly, that file only contains the info on /home, but not on the /shared export, even though /etc/exports includes both.

Re: kleines nfs problem

Alois Stöckl schrieb/wrote: hab ein kleines Problem mit nfs. Auf meinem Mailrechner der auch als winzling von Server dient gibt es ein Verzeichnis das ich über nfs zur verfügung stelle. Diese Hälfte der NFS Verbindung funktioniert auch. Jetzt habe ich mal zum testen die 3.2 er knoppix auf

kleines nfs problem

Hallo liebe Listenleser, hab ein kleines Problem mit nfs. Auf meinem Mailrechner der auch als winzling von Server dient gibt es ein Verzeichnis das ich über nfs zur verfügung stelle. Diese Hälfte der NFS Verbindung funktioniert auch. Jetzt habe ich mal zum testen die 3.2 er knoppix auf einem

Re: nfs problem

On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 05:31, gerard wrote: Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to mount an nfs drive this is the error I get mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused. Any ideas? I havent changed anything either, thats why I find it strange.

Re: nfs problem

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote: Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to mount an nfs drive this is the error I get mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused. Any ideas? I havent changed anything either, thats why I find

Re: nfs problem

On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote: Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to mount an nfs drive this is the error I get mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused. Any ideas?

Re: nfs problem

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote: Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else downgrade to 1.0.3-1. # dpkg -l | grep nfs ii nfs-common 1.0.3-2 NFS support files common to client and serve ii

Re: nfs problem

On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 12:08, Dave Carrigan wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote: Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else downgrade to 1.0.3-1. # dpkg -l | grep nfs ii nfs-common

Re: nfs problem

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:39:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: Thanks. Does sid's 1.0.5-1 work? Yes, seems to be working for me. -- Dave Carrigan Seattle, WA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.rudedog.org/ | ICQ:161669680 UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL

nfs problem

Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to mount an nfs drive this is the error I get mount: RPC: Unable to receive; errno = Connection refused. Any ideas? I havent changed anything either, thats why I find it strange. ~gerard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

NFS Problem

Hi, I'm running an NFS server on Red Hat. Connected to the Red Hat I have a Debian which I want to use as an NFS client. Ping, Ftp, Telnet, ... all seems fine. Mount and Umount is working well, however I don't have access to the selected directory. Permission denied. The only way I can have

Re: NFS Problem

Bart Lenoir wrote: Hi, I'm running an NFS server on Red Hat. Connected to the Red Hat I have a Debian which I want to use as an NFS client. Ping, Ftp, Telnet, ... all seems fine. Mount and Umount is working well, however I don't have access to the selected directory. Permission denied. The only

Re: tar/NFS problem

Hello Piers! Piers Kittel wrote: [...Backup...] 00 4 * * 0 root rm -f /home/desirebackup/home_backup.tar; tar cf /home/desirebackup/home_backup.tar /home/desire/piers Hmm, you completely delete your older backup, and then you try to get a new one? What do you think might happen once an error

Re: tar/NFS problem

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:03:07 +0200 Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, you completely delete your older backup, and then you try to get a new one? What do you think might happen once an error occurs directly after deleting the old backup? You will end up with _no_ backup at all.

Re: tar/NFS problem

Hello Paladin! Paladin wrote: On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:03:07 +0200 Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, you completely delete your older backup, and then you try to get a new one? What do you think might happen once an error occurs directly after deleting the old backup? You will

Re: tar/NFS problem

Florian, You are completely correct, and I totally agree, but the issue here is that the hard drive in Destiny is 12Gb, and the backup is around 6GB and so there isn't room for 2 backups. Interestingly, when I tried to tar the files on the main PC (Desire) and then copy it over via NFS, I

Re: tar/NFS problem

Great! Seems to be working Cheers! Piers Michael Heironimus wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:24:45AM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote: Bascially, I've got 2 computers, one which is my main PC (named desire), and the other is a server (named destiny). I'd like the server to backup the /home/piers

Re: tar/NFS problem

Furthering the subject... Is it possible to get the crontab to email me each time the job succeeds/fails or is it better to write a shell script and get crontab to execute the script? Cheers - Piers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: tar/NFS problem

--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:47:30PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote: Furthering the subject... =20 Is it possible to get the crontab to email me each time the job=20

  1   2   >