basti wrote:
> On 27.05.19 17:32, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> basti wrote:
>>
>>> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>>
>>> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
>>> ens2f1 ens2f1
>>
>>> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
>>> connection? For example tp-link
On 27.05.19 17:32, Sven Hartge wrote:
> basti wrote:
>
>> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>
>> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
>> ens2f1 ens2f1
>
>> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
>> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it
Sven Hartge wrote:
>> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>
>> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
>> ens2f1 ens2f1
>
>> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
>> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
>
> For this direct connection you
basti wrote:
> I want to speedup my network connection beween srv-a and srv-b. There is
> only a 1:1 connection.
> I have try to use balance-alb and copy some files from a to b with only
> 112 MB/s with dd and netcat.
In the RHEL Network Guide [1] it says that LACP is supported only with
switch
basti wrote:
> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
> ens2f1 ens2f1
> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
For this direct connection you should
Reco wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:48:39PM +0200, basti wrote:
>> Can this mode be used in this setup?
> AFAIK standard linux bonding can only use Passive LACP in 802.3ad.
No, it does active LACP.
>> How must I configure the other side?
> That's means you have to use openvswitch on
also on a network card with 2 NIC's
srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
ens2f1 ens2f1
Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
On 27.05.19 15:49, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, May
Hi.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 04:36:10PM +0200, basti wrote:
> also on a network card with 2 NIC's
>
> srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
> ens2f1 ens2f1
>
> Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
> connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ?
They
also on a network card with 2 NIC's
srv-a nic ens2f0 ens2f0 srv-b
ens2f1 ens2f1
Can I use a switch that only supoort static LAC to speedup my
connection? For example tp-link TL-SG108E ? Or must it support LACP?
On 27.05.19 15:49, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, May 27,
Hi.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 03:36:38PM +0200, basti wrote:
> Hello sven,
> hello reco,
>
> I want to speedup my network connection beween srv-a and srv-b. There is
> only a 1:1 connection.
Any bonding mode will utilize a single link in such case.
The 'catch 22' for active-active bonding
Hello sven,
hello reco,
I want to speedup my network connection beween srv-a and srv-b. There is
only a 1:1 connection.
I have try to use balance-alb and copy some files from a to b with only
112 MB/s with dd and netcat.
So Im not shure if balance-alb use both interfaces.
On 27.05.19 15:09,
Hi.
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:48:39PM +0200, basti wrote:
> Can this mode be used in this setup?
AFAIK standard linux bonding can only use Passive LACP in 802.3ad.
> How must I configure the other side?
That's means you have to use openvswitch on either side as it can be
configured to
basti wrote:
> I have 2 Servers both of them has an dual port nic, I want to bond this
> and try to configure this in 802.3ad mode. There are no switch beween,
> and there is no crossover cable installed.
"and there is no crossover cable installed"?
Beside the point that Gigabit Ethernet does
Hello,
I have 2 Servers both of them has an dual port nic, I want to bond this
and try to configure this in 802.3ad mode. There are no switch beween,
and there is no crossover cable installed.
Can this mode be used in this setup?
How must I configure the other side? (I have use this howto,
14 matches
Mail list logo
