On 3/26/2022 2:15 PM, Jeremy Ardley wrote:
I have been doing various changes to my network but have now got to the
stage where I have errors running
systemd restart networking
systemctl status networking
● networking.service - Raise network interfaces
Loaded: loaded
I have been doing various changes to my network but have now got to the
stage where I have errors running
systemd restart networking
systemctl status networking
● networking.service - Raise network interfaces
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/networking.service; enabled;
vendor preset:
Hi again!
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 06:02:40PM +0200, Oleg wrote:
> > ip link show
>
> $ > ip l sh
> ...
> 2: eth0: mtu 1492 qdisc pfifo_fast master
> direct0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 54:04:a6:a0:77:de brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 3: direct0: mtu 1492 qdisc
Hey Dan,
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 10:23:40AM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Can you tell us about networking on the host, please?
sure, I can.
> ip link show
$ > ip l sh
...
2: eth0: mtu 1492 qdisc pfifo_fast master
direct0 state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether
Oleg wrote:
> I've updated my server to bullseye a couple of days ago and since then I'm
> unable to get IPv4 networking to work properly again. IPv6 still seems to work
> like charm. I can also connect to the hosted VMs (KVM via libvirt) on the
> server over IPv4 without problems. However, when
Hi there,
I've updated my server to bullseye a couple of days ago and since then I'm
unable to get IPv4 networking to work properly again. IPv6 still seems to work
like charm. I can also connect to the hosted VMs (KVM via libvirt) on the
server over IPv4 without problems. However, when I try to
Dear all,
first time poster here.
Can someone help me identify a networking problem in a Debian Linux server.
The server is behind a corporate NAT and although can be reached without a
problem it serves webpages very slowly.
Downloading files from the server can be as slow as 7kbps when
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:32:44 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:32:07 +, Ramon Hofer wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:44:05 +, Camaleón wrote:
Mmm, if your problem is a missing kernel module (jme.ko), the file is
located here:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:32:07 +, Ramon Hofer wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:44:05 +, Camaleón wrote:
Mmm, if your problem is a missing kernel module (jme.ko), the file is
located here:
/lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/drivers/net/jme.ko
Which is available in the first of the CD
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:32:44PM +, Camaleón wrote:
Okay, it is important to use the right syntax for the CD to be properly
recognized.
You should never try and manually enter the CDROM into your
sources.list, always use apt-cdrom. Although, the installer usually
handles that for you.
Hi all
I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my
Ubuntu bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316
See posts 5 and 6
Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack the initrd.gz. Can you
help me with that?
So I tried to do the way
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2012 schrieb Ramon Hofer:
Hi all
I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my
Ubuntu bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316
See posts 5 and 6
Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack the
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:40:46 +0100, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2012 schrieb Ramon Hofer:
I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my
Ubuntu bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5
and 6
Post 5
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:44 +, Ramon Hofer wrote:
I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my
Ubuntu bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5
and 6
Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack the initrd.gz.
On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote:
Hi all
I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my
Ubuntu bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316
See posts 5 and 6
Post 5 sounds great but I can't find how to unpack the initrd.gz. Can you
help
On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote:
So I tried to do the way post 6 describes. I have installed debian-6.0.4-
i386-CD-1.iso after putting it on a usb stick with unetbootin.
Then I tried to install gcc but it can't find the installation medium
anymore. So I mounted the created usb stick to
On 28/02/12 16:03, Ramon Hofer wrote:
I was looking for the initrd.gz in the installation medium. I found two:
/install.386/gtk/initrd.gz and /install.386/initrd.gz
They aren't the same.
Why are there two versions of them?
Is it ok to take this one: /install.386/initrd.gz?
Hello,
Keith McKenzie a écrit :
On 28/02/12 16:03, Ramon Hofer wrote:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-initrd.html
Chapter 6.4 Examining the initrd contents tells me to:
mount -t cramfs /boot/initrd.img-2.6.12-1-686 /mnt/initrd -o loop
So I took my gunzipped file and tried to
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:28:18 +, Keith McKenzie wrote:
On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote:
Hi all
I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my
Ubuntu bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5
and 6
Post 5 sounds
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:31:19 +, Keith McKenzie wrote:
On 28/02/12 15:34, Ramon Hofer wrote:
So I tried to do the way post 6 describes. I have installed
debian-6.0.4- i386-CD-1.iso after putting it on a usb stick with
unetbootin. Then I tried to install gcc but it can't find the
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:44:05 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:44 +, Ramon Hofer wrote:
I have described my problem a while ago and now I got a solution to my
Ubuntu bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/880316 See posts 5
and 6
Post 5
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Keith McKenzie a écrit :
Ramon Hofer wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Personally I would install a different network card for the
installation and then get through the install part. Then after the
system is running I would install the new drivers when the onboard
network
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:22:17PM +0700, freeburn wrote:
Now we want to use a machine which will be connected with the smpp
server and also connected with the office network for accessing our
remote content server(where our website is hosted). I have tried to use
two ethernate cards. but
I'm describing the scenario. plz help me with this.
In our office we have set up a private network. a central dhcp server
assigns private Ip's to all the Desktops. Now recently we are developing
an automated sms application. so we have made a wired connection with a
local operators smpp server.
Am 10.12.2009 um 15:22:17 schrieb freeburn:
I'm describing the scenario. plz help me with this.
In our office we have set up a private network. a central dhcp server
assigns private Ip's to all the Desktops. Now recently we are developing
an automated sms application. so we have made a
Kernel, by default, filters bridge traffic based on /proc/net/bridge/xxx
files. You need to set the contents of one or more files to 0.
I only had to set the contents of
/proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables file to 0 (echo 0
/proc/sys/net/bridge/bridge-nf-call-iptables) and
everything
Hi,
I am trying to setup two guest windows XP on host linux amd64. Every
thing except inter-kvm network works. I have started the two kvm
machines with different macaddr to ensure there is no hwaddr conflict.
However, kvm assigns tap1 a hw address that is same as br0's hw
address. Here is
Hi folks,
I have 6 dumUs on Xen running Debian Etch including dum0. Their
hostnames are;
dum0 - xen0.satimis.com
dumU1 - xen1.satimis.com
dumU2 - xen2.satimis.com
dumU3 - xen3.satimis.com IP - 192.168.0.113
etc.
xen3.satimis.com is a mail server. It can send mails but unable
receive mails
What is your Wi-Fi chip? Maybe you don't have the
driver module
installed for the newer kernel version.
Its an Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG. From my dmesg in
the 2.6.18-4 kernel:
---
ipw3945: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945 Network
Connection
driver for Linux, 1.1.2dmpr
ipw3945: Copyright(c) 2003-2006
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 16:40 -0700, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
Im sorry, i looked closely at the packages and i see
now that theres a new version of the driver package to
go with the new kernel. I would have expected that
there would be some kind of automatic update, or some
way of letting
Thanks to all for your help. My /etc/network/interfaces was ok, just
added the line
modprobe tulip
to /etc/modules and rebooted and all is well now.
Marty
--
Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387
Free Database Search App: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml
Web
Newbie question here. I'm running Potato on an old box and it's nice
and stable providing a web environment on my LAN.
However the way I get networking going is to run the following
commands after a reboot:
modprobe tulip
ifconfig eth0 inet up 192.168.0.222 \
netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:49:57PM -0400, Marty Landman wrote:
How can I avoid having to go through this?
Easy. Go to /etc/network/interfaces (which is a file) and put your
data there like this:
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your
# system
# and how to activate them.
Marty Landman wrote:
Newbie question here. I'm running Potato on an old box and it's nice and
stable providing a web environment on my LAN.
However the way I get networking going is to run the following commands
after a reboot:
modprobe tulip
ifconfig eth0 inet up 192.168.0.222 \
netmask
My laptop is served by dhcp router. my hostname lvgdell600m.
lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hostname
lvgdell600m
my /etc/hosts is
lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost lvgdell600m
192.168.1.51mohan
192.168.1.52lvgdell600m
192.168.1.53
L.V.Gandhi wrote:
My laptop is served by dhcp router. my hostname lvgdell600m.
lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hostname
lvgdell600m
my /etc/hosts is
lvgdell600m:~# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost lvgdell600m
192.168.1.51mohan
192.168.1.52lvgdell600m
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:13:5C:8D
inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
That's odd. The line above should contain RUNNING but it doesn't. Can
Matt Perry wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:13:5C:8D
inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
That's odd. The line above should contain RUNNING but it
Alvin Oga wrote:
yup ... your mask 255.255.255.0 says use only the last octet ..
10.0.0.x is NOT in the same network as 10.1.1.x
it's doing what you told it ... maybe not what you want
if you want to use 10.0.0.2 ... don't... 0 is best used for network name
use 10.1.1.2 and your troubles
Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Alvin Oga wrote:
yup ... your mask 255.255.255.0 says use only the last octet ..
10.0.0.x is NOT in the same network as 10.1.1.x
it's doing what you told it ... maybe not what you want
if you want to use 10.0.0.2 ... don't... 0 is best used for network
name
use
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Matt Perry wrote:
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:05:1C:13:5C:8D
inet addr:10.1.1.1 Bcast:10.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Thanks for the reply, I was wondering what a good way of subnetting my networks
would be.. What would be be advisable for someone with a DMZ and a LAN, and
another LAN inside the first LAN
better or good way will depend on who you ask
if it's
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
0.0.0.0
Matt Perry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
Hi, I'm having a very strange networking problem that has my linux
buddies and I stumped.
I'll draw a basic mud map because it makes it ALOT easier to understand
my situation as I have two gateways due to shared housing.
[Bridged ADSL Modem]
|
[Firewall]
(220.244.217.*, 10.0.1.1
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
my Debian Box. eg: The Firewall can ping my Debian Box, but my Debian
Box can't ping the firewall.
It's sounds like IP forwarding isn't working. Take down the interface
that uses 10.1.1.1 and then try to ping the firewall. What happens?
What is the
Matt Perry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
my Debian Box. eg: The Firewall can ping my Debian Box, but my Debian
Box can't ping the firewall.
It's sounds like IP forwarding isn't working. Take down the interface
that uses 10.1.1.1 and then try to ping the firewall. What
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
I cant see anything wrong with my routing table either:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
10.0.0.0
Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Hi, I'm having a very strange networking problem that has my linux
buddies and I stumped.
I'll draw a basic mud map because it makes it ALOT easier to understand
my situation as I have two gateways due to shared housing.
I _thought_ you might be Australian.
[Bridged ADSL
John Summerfield wrote:
I _thought_ you might be Australian.
Yes I am :)
I don't know just that your tools are on Windows: boot Linux (Knoppix
is fine) if you can. From there,
traceroute x.com
ping -R -c4 x.org
and see where routing breaks.
Also, on Debbie (the Debian box)
sysctl -a | grep ip_
Jonathan Barnes wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
I _thought_ you might be Australian.
Yes I am :)
We're everywhere! (It's Sunday arvo - time to break my Linux box for
this week.)
--
Paul
http://paulgear.webhop.net
--
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired,
Paul Gear wrote:
Jonathan Barnes wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
I _thought_ you might be Australian.
Yes I am :)
We're everywhere! (It's Sunday arvo - time to break my Linux box for
this week.)
Nah. Your both bananabenders. Not that we don't bend a few.
_I_ have a few
Matt Perry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
I cant see anything wrong with my routing table either:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
Jonathan Barnes wrote:
Matt Perry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Jonathan Barnes wrote:
I cant see anything wrong with my routing table either:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
Use Iface
10.0.0.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U
Hi people,
I have a networking problem on several machines running woody and sarge
all with the same hardware:
Abit BP-6 dual celeron motherboard w. celeron 466 processors
Intel etherexpress pro 100 ethernet cards
All machines run Linux kernel 2.4.25
Problem: networking ceases to funcion
on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 09:53:38PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:26:33PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
| What version of the dhcp-client package do you have installed?
|
| 2.0pl5-11
on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:41:54PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:47:26PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
| On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
[...]
| | how,
[back on-list]
on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated:
I don't have a specific answer to your problem,
but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems.
Also, having testing, unstable, and stable all in
/etc/apt/sources.list seems to get aptitude
to converge on a working
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
[...]
| I haven't noticed any changes in networking, but that might be
| dependent on the hardware and what modules I already had configured
| to be loaded.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:11:24PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| [back on-list]
|
| on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated:
| I don't have a specific answer to your problem,
| but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems.
| Also, having testing, unstable, and stable all in
on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
[...]
| I haven't noticed any changes in networking, but that might be
|
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 02:11:24PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 02:02:06PM -0400, J F insinuated:
| I don't have a specific answer to your problem,
| but using aptitude seems to ease upgrade problems.
| Also, having testing, unstable, and
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 06:26:33PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| on Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:08:28PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
| On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 12:19:06PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| | on Fri, 09 Apr 2004 03:42:06PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
| [...]
| |
Aurélien,
Thank you for your prompt and insightful reply. I'll
get a move on learning to compiling my own kernel.
Hopefully, that'll get the networking functioning. In
the mean time, I'd still like to learn exactly how my
setup isn't working and what I am fixing. The
following is the info you
Le lun 22/03/2004 à 09:22, Renhao Zhang a écrit :
Aurlien,
Thank you for your prompt and insightful reply. I'll
get a move on learning to compiling my own kernel.
Wait a minute... !
# The first network card - this entry was created
during the Debian installation
# (network, broadcast
--- Aurélien_Campéas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have a problem with dhcp here. Are you sure you want it ? It
seems
like the dhcp client doesn't find a dhcp server...
I mean, why not pick up some private ip adress (like 192.168.0.2) and
rewrite your eth0 entry in /etc/network/interfaces as
I need to automate setting up my network and i seem to be missing
something...
using debian
Linux Version 2.4.18-bf2.4-xfs
if i manually do the following commands i can get out on my network
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
route add default gw 192.168.1.254
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 12:44:05AM -0800, Dale Welch wrote:
if i manually do the following commands i can get out on my network
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
route add default gw 192.168.1.254
Edit
To explain better:
if i manually do the following commands i can get out on my network
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.50 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
route add default gw 192.168.1.254
i need to have that configured automatically during start-up and i need my
dns to work.
just found my dns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:29:57AM -0800, Dale Welch wrote:
interfaces:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.1.51
network 192.168.1.0
gateway 192.168.1.254
Try this.
# /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration file for
I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with
my Sony Clie PDA.
I installed Woody using packages via ftp, so it's up to date. During
the install, one of the choices is to use 'netenv' to configure the
network. I don't know any better - I'm new to Debian - so I let it.
Hi,
I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with
my Sony Clie PDA.
I installed Woody using packages via ftp, so it's up to date. During
the install, one of the choices is to use 'netenv' to configure the
network. I don't know any better - I'm new to Debian - so I let
Bret Comstock Waldow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with
my Sony Clie PDA.
(This works fine for me, but I always build my own kernel. I've had
better luck using coldsync than pilot-link, and the first sync always
fails.)
I'm
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:25, David Z Maze wrote:
Bret Comstock Waldow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to get Debian going on my Thinkpad T21, and synchronize with
my Sony Clie PDA.
(This works fine for me, but I always build my own kernel. I've had
better luck using coldsync
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 13:25, David Z Maze wrote:
Hmm. Is there anything informative in /etc/network/interfaces (the
normal place for network settings under Debian)? You also might try
running your DHCP client by hand, and seeing if that works. Also,
check that your kernel configuration
Alright, after playing around some more.. I have discovered that
non-Debian distros work as the workstation. Linux BBC (bootable
business card) worked fine, as did Mandrake. BBC used kernel
2.4.5-xfs.. any ideas what might be wrong?
Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El(On) Tue, 08 Oct 2002 15:21:06 -0400
Ed McMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió(wrote):
Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings
leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue
or rate limiter blocking it as the router never receives it. That,
This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said:
There is no rate limiting that I am aware of. I am using pmfirewall.
All other hosts work fine (including this one when in Windows!).
Now, this host can access the Lan without problem. I can SSH and scp
all I want without problem. However, once
Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-07 20:37 -0400:
Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings
leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue
or rate limiter blocking it as the router never receives it. That, or
the switch is evil and blocks frames coming from
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 12:00:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-user)
wrote:
Jeff Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-07 20:37 -0400:
Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings
leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue
or rate limiter blocking it as
Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, you wrote:
Jeff Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400:
Jeff snip
Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the same
configuration in Windows. All the other computers work fine too. I
have been trying to figure out what the problem is, so I
Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-07 15:25 -0400:
Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, you wrote:
Jeff Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400:
Jeff snip
Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the same
configuration in Windows. All the other computers work fine too. I
have been
Monday, October 7, 2002, 3:48:39 PM, Stephen Gran (Stephen) wrote:
Stephen This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said:
Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:39:40 PM, you wrote:
Jeff Ed McMan, 2002-Oct-06 19:22 -0400:
Jeff snip
Here is the weird part. This computer works fine using the same
Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:46:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-user) wrote:
Stephen Firewall on the box in question? Sounds like something is rate-limiting
Stephen the pings, and if the box just stops sending them, it's probably the box
Stephen itself, rather than anything past it.
Ed No
This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said:
Stephen tcpdump/etheral on the box in question at the same time as on the router
Stephen - is the box sending packets that the router never sees?
Ed I didn't try that. I'm going to try that now.
Stephen pinging hosts on the internal network -
Monday, October 7, 2002, 8:53:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (debian-user) wrote:
Stephen This one time, at band camp, Ed McMan said:
Argh. Now I'm just more confused. OK, tethereal picks up the pings
leaving the machine. So, that means there must be some kind of queue
or rate limiter
I am having a very odd network problem, and I can't figure out the
problem. Here is a description of my network:
(cable modem)
-
(linux box as router running debian of course ;))
- switch
(misc workstations)
The router machine is running fine. I just recently installed Debian
on a workstation
on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 06:39:44PM -0700, Bob Galloway ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Well, I finally got the box to network. As god as my witness, I have
no idea why this worked, but it worked: I swapped the NetGear card out
of the box, replaced it with the LinkSys card, and tried one more
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:55:15PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:04:51PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Another thought: PCI bus problems?
Have you tried an alternate card in the box? If everthing outside the
box works, the card(s) work, and the CPU isn't
on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 12:56:22AM -0700, Bob Galloway ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:55:15PM -0700, Brandon High wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:04:51PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Another thought: PCI bus problems?
Have you tried an alternate card in the
Well, I finally got the box to network. As god as my witness, I have
no idea why this worked, but it worked: I swapped the NetGear card out
of the box, replaced it with the LinkSys card, and tried one more time.
Funny, it works now.
I'm still scratching my head wondering why it didn't work
Howdy, deb folk!
I'm trying to turn an old ATT Globalyst P90 box into a firewall
running Debian. Installation via NFS would be much easier if I could
get networking to work! Too bad I can't seem to get the box to notice
incoming packets.
Symptoms:
- running linux x86 2.0.36, with the tulip
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:33:06PM -0700, Bob Galloway wrote:
| Howdy, deb folk!
|
| I'm trying to turn an old ATT Globalyst P90 box into a firewall
| running Debian. Installation via NFS would be much easier if I could
| get networking to work! Too bad I can't seem to get the box to notice
|
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:51:20AM -0400, dman wrote:
tulip driver ... I've heard stories from some people that older tulip
drivers don't work with certain newer cards. What NIC are you using?
Personally I've never had any problems with the tulip driver starting
with version 0.90 and a
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 10:01:51PM -0700, Bob Galloway wrote:
Do you have the installation stuff on the NFS export? It may be
easier to download rescue and root floppies from the potato installers
and do a network install. You'd be using a 2.2 kernel then.
I considered doing that, but
on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:08:22PM -0700, Bob Galloway ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 10:01:51PM -0700, Bob Galloway wrote:
Do you have the installation stuff on the NFS export? It may be
easier to download rescue and root floppies from the potato installers
and do
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:33:04PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Okay. I just tried again with potato install disks, from the 'compact'
series. Same problems as with slink. Great sadness and woe.
A recap:
- ifconfig reports TX packets, but no RX packets.
- network card
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:10:21AM -0700 or thereabouts, Bob Galloway wrote:
Forgive me I this is redundant, but is your ethernet card set to auto negotiate
its speed? Sometimes this can be a problem if you are on a 10BaseT network and
the card goes to 100Baset.
Jamie Strandboge
--
The goal
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:51:21AM -0400, James D Strandboge wrote:
Forgive me I this is redundant, but is your ethernet card set to auto
negotiate
its speed? Sometimes this can be a problem if you are on a 10BaseT network
and
the card goes to 100Baset.
I'm using 10BaseT. When I swap in
on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:33:06PM -0700, Bob Galloway ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Howdy, deb folk!
I'm trying to turn an old ATT Globalyst P90 box into a firewall
running Debian. Installation via NFS would be much easier if I could
get networking to work! Too bad I can't seem to get the
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
